- Joined
- Aug 16, 2005
- Messages
- 25,996 (3.79/day)
- Location
- Alabama
System Name | Rocinante |
---|---|
Processor | I9 14900KS |
Motherboard | MSI MPG Z790I Edge WiFi Gaming |
Cooling | be quiet! Pure Loop 240mm |
Memory | 64GB Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 6000 @6400 |
Video Card(s) | MSI SUPRIM Liquid X 4090 |
Storage | 1x 500GB 980 Pro | 1x 1TB 980 Pro | 1x 8TB Corsair MP400 |
Display(s) | Odyssey OLED G9 (G95SC) |
Case | LANCOOL 205M MESH Snow |
Audio Device(s) | Moondrop S8's on schitt Modi+ & Valhalla 2 |
Power Supply | ASUS ROG Loki SFX-L 1000W |
Mouse | Lamzu Atlantis mini (White) |
Keyboard | Monsgeek M3 Lavender, Akko Crystal Blues |
VR HMD | Quest 3 |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | I dont have time for that. |
Worse comparison made of all time.
Why exactly? Im curious because at the moment only flag ship cards costing several hundred dollars a piece in multi GPU configurations can sustain the FPS necessary to play most popular games at high detail levels. This makes it impractical for the norm not to mention it simply hasn't been pushed hard enough to be much more than a novelty item for the market. Likewise while current GPUS including flag ships have DP outputs most of these connections coincide with the high resolution high Hz monitors they would "look best on". However Monitors in even high price segments are still made with even VGA which as outdated as it is is still used in the majority of affordable monitors and TVs. DVI didn't even manage to take its crown.
I would like your input on why exactly 4k gaming and DP only GPUs are not only somehow superior for all intensive purposes in today's saturated 1080p market but also why you might think the market is full enough of these products to warrent such a change from DVI?
I will ask @EarthDog as well. Reviewing aside of course. I did that as well and consumerism and elitism are very different things.