OneMoar
There is Always Moar
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 8,746 (1.70/day)
- Location
- Rochester area
System Name | RPC MK2.5 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5800x |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus Pro V2 |
Cooling | Enermax ETX-T50RGB |
Memory | CL16 BL2K16G36C16U4RL 3600 1:1 micron e-die |
Video Card(s) | GIGABYTE RTX 3070 Ti GAMING OC |
Storage | ADATA SX8200PRO NVME 512GB, Intel 545s 500GBSSD, ADATA SU800 SSD, 3TB Spinner |
Display(s) | LG Ultra Gear 32 1440p 165hz Dell 1440p 75hz |
Case | Phanteks P300 /w 300A front panel conversion |
Audio Device(s) | onboard |
Power Supply | SeaSonic Focus+ Platinum 750W |
Mouse | Kone burst Pro |
Keyboard | EVGA Z15 |
Software | Windows 11 +startisallback |
my fault I requested it be re-opened due to a case of idiocy on the guru3d boardFor the life of me, I am having difficulty identifying why this thread resurrection has occurred when the title suggests a referral to AMD Catalyst drivers having a high overhead in DX11 games and then relating that to a set of benchmarks relating to an NVidia card? Someone please help!
really should be a separate thread at this-stage
tl:dr AMD's drivers don't use command lists and they are slower then they *should* be