• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench

Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
929 (0.18/day)
System Name Desktop | Laptop
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D | Intel Core i7 7700HQ
Motherboard MAG X570S Torpedo Max| Neptune KLS HM175
Cooling Corsair H100x | Twin fan, fin stack & heat pipes
Memory 32GB G.Skill F4-3600C16-8GVK @ 3600MHz / 16-16-16-36-1T | 16GB DDR4 @ 2400MHz / 17-17-17-39-2T
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra | GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB + Kingston KC3000 2TB + Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 970 Evo 500GB
Display(s) 32" Dell G3223Q (2160p @ 144Hz) | 17" IPS 1920x1080P
Case Fractal Meshify 2 Compact | Aspire V Nitro BE
Audio Device(s) ifi Audio ZEN DAC V2 + Focal Radiance / HyperX Solocast
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex V Platinum Pro 1000W | 150W
Mouse Razer Viper Ultimate | Logitech MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Razer Huntsman V2 Optical (Linear Red)
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
This is good news. If Nvidia drop their prices (unlikely as the products will probably conveniently slot between each other in the price v performance metric), I might just buy a GTX 980Ti...

As always, will wait for W1zzard's brilliant reviews.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,180 (0.21/day)
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
. AMD did a good job to get this performance from 28nm and we get new technology with HBM.

Its not over yet, there should be some interesting non-reference overclocked versions like ASUS DCUII or MSI Lightning etc.

There was a rumour about versions of fury with GDDR5 to allow for higher Vram, but either way there should be lots of interesting options based on this GPU. Anyway 4GB is enough for the vast majority of gamers.

Its going to be a long time before pascal comes next year
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,389 (0.98/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Does it? I wasn't aware the card had been reviewed yet?
The only benchmarks I've seen that have some validity, are from people with cards in hand. Performance looks pretty similar.
Of course if DG Lee is actually benching the cards, I'd assume he must have had the result on screen at some stage - why not post screencaps if this is the case?

Im talking about the slides shown in this news post, the title reads "
Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench"

and we see in the first slide that the Fury X does indeed outperform TitanX by.. well about 30 points, which can hardly be called outperforming.

Now a bigger jump can be seen at the bottom of the slide, the 390x scoring about 1500 points higher then the 290x.
Now if this is just the clocks, then that makes the "outperforming" part of the Fury X over the Titan X even less relevant, a 5mhz bump should easily level the 2 out.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2012
Messages
12,062 (2.77/day)
Location
Gypsyland, UK
System Name HP Omen 17
Processor i7 7700HQ
Memory 16GB 2400Mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1060
Storage Samsung SM961 256GB + HGST 1TB
Display(s) 1080p IPS G-SYNC 75Hz
Audio Device(s) Bang & Olufsen
Power Supply 230W
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD+
Software Win 10 Pro
Im talking about the slides shown in this news post, the title reads "
Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench"

and we see in the first slide that the Fury X does indeed outperform TitanX by.. well about 30 points, which can hardly be called outperforming.

Now a bigger jump can be seen at the bottom of the slide, the 390x scoring about 1500 points higher then the 290x.
Now if this is just the clocks, then that makes the "outperforming" part of the Fury X over the Titan X even less relevant, a 5mhz bump should easily level the 2 out.

Those slides are made up benchmarks using educated guesses. They are not actual benchmarks run on the actual hardware. It's entirely guestimation.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,389 (0.98/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> ... nope still the same :'(
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Those slides are made up benchmarks using educated guesses. They are not actual benchmarks run on the actual hardware. It's entirely guestimation.

"according to leaked 3DMark 11 and 3DMark (2013) benches by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr."

Maybe not the most credible source but it goes a bit far to just call them "made up" right?
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,775 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
"according to leaked 3DMark 11 and 3DMark (2013) benches by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr."

Maybe not the most credible source but it goes a bit far to just call them "made up" right?

Come on. It's being done every single day. Ignore this stuff and wait for real world performance, much safer, much closer to the actual facts. We don't even have bench specifics, clocks, etc. All of which you would expect if these benchmarks were real and not a wild guess.

In my opinion AMD's slideshow falls in the exact same category.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Messages
861 (0.25/day)
Actually, no.

1. You do need this card at 1080 and 1440 because not even then some games will be playable in 60 or 144 FPS. For as long as you don't have 60 FPS as minimum, you're not experiencing the best and perfect fluidity. At least on average you should have 60 FPS for smooth gameplay. Then, we have 144Hz monitors on 1080 and 1440 that provide great experience and need power.
So yes, you NEED this card.

2. Unfortunately, yes, 4GB might not be enough for some 4K games, but for some it will be. You don't need AA anyway at 4K so most games will work fine.

3. However, those games that need more, like GTA5 at 5K don't stop at 6GB anyway. You need more than that and 980Ti can't help you. If you play at 5K, yes, for some games only TitanX works, but in most cases even at 4K Fury X will be fine.

You are actually agreeing with him, and he makes a good point. In some games even now at 1440p, 4GB of vram limits eye candy. That's running at 72 fps locked, and he doesn't say what the card is, but it's not one of the latest. Sure, in most of them it won't be an issue and maybe it isn't a big deal to tone down the settings a little. But for some people it is a little disappointing to have a new $600 card with this limitation.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
353 (0.09/day)
Processor Core i5-3350P @3.5GHz
Motherboard MSI Z77MA-G45 (uATX)
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) |Ξ \/ G /\ GeForce GTX 670 FTW+ 4GB w/Backplate, Part Number: 04G-P4-3673-KR, ASIC 68.5%
Storage some cheap seagates and one wd green
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case some cheap old eurocase, black, with integrated cheap lit lcd for basic monitoring
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Triathlor 550W ETA550AWT bronze, non-modular, airflow audible over 300W power draw
Mouse PMSG1G
Keyboard oldschool membrane Keytronic 104 Key PS/2 (big enter, right part of right shift broken into "\" key)
In DX12 it would, but I wouldn't hold your breath for an abundance of DX12 games. Developers probably won't release games that fully support DX12 until 2018.
thats ok. im not interested in games primarily. im interested in the functionality (i was reacting to the drop of performance in the 5k,8k scenarios of firestrike probably due to 4GB memory buffer clutter). and if im able to use both gpus from programmatical point of view without any special enabling profiles from amd driver team, id be most satisfied. buying a dual gpu card only to be able to use one of those would be quite an inefficient endeavour.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
4,179 (1.15/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer
Processor i7 10700K 5.1ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2
Motherboard Asus Strix Z490 / Dell Dual Socket (R720)
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock
Memory Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector)
Storage Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5
Display(s) Acer XG270HU, Samsung G7 Odyssey (1440p 240hz)
Case Thermaltake Cube / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows Server 2016
Still waiting for reviews across the web instead of leaks. I want to see them from everyone because then we can get a good idea of where the real performance is!

Either way if this holds to be true, then its a great day!
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
353 (0.09/day)
Processor Core i5-3350P @3.5GHz
Motherboard MSI Z77MA-G45 (uATX)
Cooling Stock Intel
Memory 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) |Ξ \/ G /\ GeForce GTX 670 FTW+ 4GB w/Backplate, Part Number: 04G-P4-3673-KR, ASIC 68.5%
Storage some cheap seagates and one wd green
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case some cheap old eurocase, black, with integrated cheap lit lcd for basic monitoring
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Triathlor 550W ETA550AWT bronze, non-modular, airflow audible over 300W power draw
Mouse PMSG1G
Keyboard oldschool membrane Keytronic 104 Key PS/2 (big enter, right part of right shift broken into "\" key)
I think some of our members have been spreading FUD no matter what.

AMD have launched a new lineup, based on completely new tech with new menory, a bandwith Nvidia can only dream of.

1 member in perticular have been very negative allready from the start. He wants maximum preformance for under 400 euros which is his max....well that NOT going to happen and even within his price range he is still unhappy while his machine have a 3 year old setup. I just dont understand it at all.

If you want the newest and best, theres a price to pay, and still AMD delivers even this time arround, at a lower price, than Nvidia has of now.
Looking at how some have been bashing AMD for not delivering stabile drivers ?, just look at Nvidia their last 3 drivers havent been stabile and caused a lot of problems for a lot of people, until the last one, so my friend tells me.

I have made my mind up, Im going for the Fury X or the Fury, all comes down to which hit the shelves first and I really dont care about the price. It can be 500-6-7 euros, I dont care, all I know is that I want it.
look, there is a distant or not too distant possibility, that amd rented a technology from nvidia (who may have developed it themselves or rented elsewhere) to produce the improved price/performance ratio, just to keep the nvidia-amd tandem going. we may be just witnessing a perfect cartell going without realizing it. you simply cant tell. so 400 bucks for a top notch card is as possible as 650 bucks. but both under different economical conditions. do amd deserve their product to be bought? i dont think theres a natural deserve system in this world. if you think they deserve, then buy it for their price and then donate on top of it. there are people in this world for which its not easy to spend 400 on one brand new component. do they deserve to only buy used or old ones? your call..
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,984 (1.21/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
look, there is a distant or not too distant possibility, that amd rented a technology from nvidia (who may have developed it themselves or rented elsewhere) to produce the improved price/performance ratio, just to keep the nvidia-amd tandem going. we may be just witnessing a perfect cartell going without realizing it. you simply cant tell. so 400 bucks for a top notch card is as possible as 650 bucks. but both under different economical conditions. do amd deserve their product to be bought? i dont think theres a natural deserve system in this world. if you think they deserve, then buy it for their price and then donate on top of it. there are people in this world for which its not easy to spend 400 on one brand new component. do they deserve to only buy used or old ones? your call..

Yes. Because they are not owed a 600 graphics card for 400 either. You either have the money or you don't. I don't have 600 so I won't buy it. Will I complain that it is 600 and not 400? No.
 

kaligon

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Damn... you internet "experts" are funny as hell! Still can't figure out how nobody around here realizes you're comparing DDR5 technology to HBM technology, which is something brand new and much more efficient in terms of data processing speed. We don't even know how far its performance extends, nor what it can do with those 4GBs. Stop misinforming people, because some might even believe this bullcrap. Read up on how HBM works and stop making stupid comparisons. The only thing you can count on will be the upcoming benchmarks, aside from that, nothing should be taken into consideration.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Messages
861 (0.25/day)
Damn... you internet "experts" are funny as hell! Still can't figure out how nobody around here realizes you're comparing DDR5 technology to HBM technology, which is something brand new and much more efficient in terms of data processing speed. We don't even know how far its performance extends, nor what it can do with those 4GBs.

Not talking about speed here, but rather capacity. 4GB HBM is still 4GB of digital memory, and when the game needs >4GB to store the information it needs, then you will have issues.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
31 (0.01/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 5800X3d
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aeorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory G.SKILL 32GB KIT DDR4 3600 MHz CL16 Trident Z @3666MHz tuned by Ryzen calculator
Video Card(s) EVGA 3080Ti XC3 ULTRA@1800MHz 0.8v
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 2 TB, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 2TB
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED
Case Cooler Master MasterBox NR200P
Audio Device(s) Grado
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Logitech G PRO X Superlight
Keyboard custom
Damn... you internet "experts" are funny as hell! Still can't figure out how nobody around here realizes you're comparing DDR5 technology to HBM technology, which is something brand new and much more efficient in terms of data processing speed. We don't even know how far its performance extends, nor what it can do with those 4GBs. Stop misinforming people, because some might even believe this bullcrap. Read up on how HBM works and stop making stupid comparisons. The only thing you can count on will be the upcoming benchmarks, aside from that, nothing should be taken into consideration.

Rofl you are the internet expert.... when your cerebral capacity is small, its irrelevant how fast you can speak, you are dumb, thats the problem.... you know what i mean... thats why there is significant performance drop in this "fake" performance tests in 8k resolution....
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,775 (5.97/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
Let's just all call each other dumb and be happy about it.

Makes life a lot more enjoyable :clap:
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
Wow, so much anger going on over guesstimated benchmarks from an unreliable source.
Allow me to lay down the facts to help resolve the arguing.
1. The more ram, the better, regardless of the game, the resolution etc.
2. The faster the speed of the ram, the better!
3. The faster the GPU, the better.
I am sure you get my point.

If have concerns regarding power-draw or maybe consider these 'highest-end available' consumer products as overkill, then, perhaps you should not be considering the purchase of the 'highest-end available' model and go for something aimed at your budget/requirements.

Personally, I play at 4k except when I am using my racing simulator which results in 10440 x 2160 resolution.
Next year i plan to get myself another 3 4K screens and mount them which would result in 10440 x 4320 resolution.
Why would i do this ? Because i can!
Is this reasonable thinking ? Depends if 17PSi Turbo is reasonable in my car with my miltek exhaust, clutch upgrade, RS500 brakepads, Slotted & Vented front/back discs, big-assed intercooler, dreamscience cold air intake, modded swaybars, Quaife LSD and so on.

I am proud of AMD R&D. HBM is a huge leap and will improve with time. I really can see HBM taking cards to 64Gb and maybe beyond. GPU speed might be a limiting factor, but that's another matter. It is more of a case, whether we can or not.
I applaud AMD for being able to continue to survive, and not only that, bring us high-end quality products that make the opposition cry and even bitch. Nvidia has a much larger market-share, much larger R&D fund and has a much larger sum worth, and yet AMD is either on-top, even or slightly under, not the defeated little company in the corner of the market that Nvidia wants them to be.

Don't get me wrong, i love my Titans and i am not some AMD fan-boy, in-fact, i think both companies are playing us and i hate that about both of them, but i can't do anything about that. I can only give credit where it is due.

The last time i was this proud of either AMD or Nvidia was when Nvidia released the 8800GTX.
 

Jax2Elite

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Lets not forget this is AMD's next generation and it is only just and I will repeat "just" ahead of what is now getting on for a 12 month old Nvidia architecture. If we look at Maxwell I (GTX 750Ti) then that is actually 16 months old.

I am super happy AMD is finally releasing something that is not going to set my house on fire and well done to them. Unfortunately the performance gap is certainly not big enough to suffer drivers that are equally as bad as Creative Sound Blasters with U.I design on par with Windows 95.

Performance is only one part of a much bigger picture.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
Lets not forget this is AMD's next generation and it is only just and I will repeat "just" ahead of what is now getting on for a 12 month old Nvidia architecture. If we look at Maxwell I (GTX 750Ti) then that is actually 16 months old.

I am super happy AMD is finally releasing something that is not going to set my house on fire and well done to them. Unfortunately the performance gap is certainly not big enough to suffer drivers that are equally as bad as Creative Sound Blasters with U.I design on par with Windows 95.

Performance is only one part of a much bigger picture.
That's a damn good first post. Welcome to TechPowerUP!
I do not have a problem with the heat coming from my AMD GPU's because they seem to have awesome fans from the factory capable of cooling the cards appropriately, problem is, they sound like an aircraft landed on your desktop!
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,984 (1.21/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
Is this reasonable thinking ? Depends if 17PSi Turbo is reasonable in my car with my miltek exhaust, clutch upgrade, RS500 brakepads, Slotted & Vented front/back discs, big-assed intercooler, dreamscience cold air intake, modded swaybars, Quaife LSD and so on.

What kind of car do you have?
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Keep on topic folks. I won't ask again.

Thank you.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
2,388 (0.67/day)
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia USA
System Name Home Brewed
Processor i9-7900X and i7-8700K
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme & ASUS Prime Z-370 A
Cooling Corsair 280mm AIO & Thermaltake Water 3.0
Memory 64GB DDR4-3000 GSKill RipJaws-V & 32GB DDR4-3466 GEIL Potenza
Video Card(s) 2X-GTX-1080 SLI & 2 GTX-1070Ti 8GB G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage Both have 2TB HDDs for storage, 480GB SSDs for OS, and 240GB SSDs for Steam Games
Display(s) ACER 28" B286HK 4K & Samsung 32" 1080P
Case NZXT Source 540 & Rosewill Rise Chassis
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM1000 & Corsair RM850
Mouse Generic
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Tournament & Corsair K90
Software Win-10 Professional
Benchmark Scores yes
I think some of our members have been spreading FUD no matter what.

AMD have launched a new lineup, based on completely new tech with new memory, a bandwidth Nvidia can only dream of.

1 member, in particular, has been very negative already from the start. He wants maximum performance for under 400 euros which is his max....well that NOT going to happen and even within his price range he is still unhappy while his machine have a 3-year-old setup. I just don't understand it at all.

If you want the newest and best, there's a price to pay, and still AMD delivers even this time around, at a lower price, than Nvidia has of now.
Looking at how some have been bashing AMD for not delivering stable drivers ?, just look at Nvidia their last 3 drivers haven't been stable and caused a lot of problems for a lot of people, until the last one, so my friend tells me.

I have made my mind up, I'm going for the Fury X or the Fury, all comes down to which hit the shelves first and I really don't care about the price. It can be 500-6-7 euros, I don't care, all I know is that I want it.


The Fury looks good to me too. How, and why they're getting such good numbers out of Fury intrigues me to no end. Is 4GB of memory somehow relevant again?



Card not relevant for its given performance....

AMD FUKED up this card putting only 4.

I really wanted this card too, I waited so long, now I'm going to end up with the 980ti.


Take my advice guys... 4GB is not enough for this GPU.
and if your gaming at 1080.... then you don't need this GPU anyway.
my wife still uses a GTX 680 that pushes 1080 at 200fps + in most titles
with the new stuff still hitting 60-65 without breaking a sweat.

Maybe a totally redesigned memory interface and redesigned memory have combined to enhance the performance of that measly 4GB?
Is it not possible that what we know as fact could be changing because of it? Could 4GB of a brand new design change the way we game on our PCs?
 

Flazza

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
I am fairly certain even in capacity alone you cannot compare 4gb gddr5 with 4 gb hbm, simply because hbm being clocked at a much lower speed doesnt have all the re-transmitted bus memory errors which you normally get with gddr5.

Someone will hopefully correct me if I am wrong, i am just going by from what I remember of an old white paper on some of the technologies built into gddr5 (error detection and re-transmission).
 

GAR

Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Messages
137 (0.02/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.6ghz
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance Pro 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon R9 290X
Storage Samsung 500GB SSD
Display(s) Asus VG248QE 144HZ
Case Corsair Air 540
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs ZxR
Power Supply Corsair HX1050
Software Windows 8.1 Pro
FAKE, FAKE, AND FAKE. Why report BS? Just wait one more week.
 

Flazza

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
FAKE, FAKE, AND FAKE. Why report BS? Just wait one more week.

Very true

Human nature I suppose, when little information is presented we tend to fill in the blanks ourselves.

Not that I will be buying any cards any time soon... I think my dual r9 290's will last a fair bit longer under dx12.
 
Top