• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench

Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,926 (0.46/day)
Location
UK
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
nobody going to mention the R9 390x seems to preform quite a bit better then the r9 290x?

5% core clock increase and 20% mem clock increase. 10% overall increase. Looks reasonable and not unexpected IMO.
 

Black

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
look, there is a distant or not too distant possibility, that amd rented a technology from nvidia (who may have developed it themselves or rented elsewhere) to produce the improved price/performance ratio, just to keep the nvidia-amd tandem going. we may be just witnessing a perfect cartell going without realizing it. you simply cant tell. so 400 bucks for a top notch card is as possible as 650 bucks. but both under different economical conditions. do amd deserve their product to be bought? i dont think theres a natural deserve system in this world. if you think they deserve, then buy it for their price and then donate on top of it. there are people in this world for which its not easy to spend 400 on one brand new component. do they deserve to only buy used or old ones? your call..


AMD rented a technology from nvidia ? o_O
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
854 (0.17/day)
If you extrapolate the numbers based on shader count of the 290X and the Fury X you will notice the Fury X beating the TitanX and 980ti in some games and losing to them in others. For one, you have to realize that the performance numbers of the 980ti and the TitanX are very close and losing to the Titan X or beating the 980ti will probably also have you losing to the 980ti or beating the TitanX, still following? ;)

Based on the shader increase only the Fury X should be competitive to NVidias highest end cards.

I do think 4GB is not really enough, objectively 4GB for 4K with future games, it's not realistic. I understand that AMD may not have the R&D down for 8GB HBM so they may not have the choice. I hope DX12 will help with future-proofing the 4GB HBM, only time will tell.

I have a 1080p monitor and getting a min framerate of 60fps in every game at max graphics is my goal so I don't mind the 4GB of VRAM but that's just me.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,356 (0.50/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
I get the sneaking suspicion the Fury X won't overclock that well too. I don't think the AIO liquid cooler was an aesthetic choice...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)


 

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,378 (2.37/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10

Nobody can say compared to the awful 290X cooler implementation that this Fury X design isn't anything other than spectacular.
For all the critics of the Hawaii release, AMD appear to have put a shit load of work into this design. On that alone, we should all applaud AMD for their work.
As for performance I'll wait and see the reviews and not pander to rumour so close to its release. But c'mon people, the Fury X design brief is top fucking notch. Pardon my French.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
306 (0.05/day)
Location
EU
I think some of our members have been spreading FUD no matter what.

AMD have launched a new lineup, based on completely new tech with new menory, a bandwith Nvidia can only dream of.

1 member in perticular have been very negative allready from the start. He wants maximum preformance for under 400 euros which is his max....well that NOT going to happen and even within his price range he is still unhappy while his machine have a 3 year old setup. I just dont understand it at all.

If you want the newest and best, theres a price to pay, and still AMD delivers even this time arround, at a lower price, than Nvidia has of now.
Looking at how some have been bashing AMD for not delivering stabile drivers ?, just look at Nvidia their last 3 drivers havent been stabile and caused a lot of problems for a lot of people, until the last one, so my friend tells me.

I have made my mind up, Im going for the Fury X or the Fury, all comes down to which hit the shelves first and I really dont care about the price. It can be 500-6-7 euros, I dont care, all I know is that I want it.

Paying the top price at introduction of a top of the line card is a fool's game, you will find a better cheaper, and fixed, product will be out a few months later and your money is gone.
But if you have a lot of spare cash and don't care, all the better you buy it since that does help the companies and that does help the people who are more sensible with their money :)
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
306 (0.05/day)
Location
EU
If you extrapolate the numbers based on shader count of the 290X and the Fury X you will notice the Fury X beating the TitanX and 980ti in some games and losing to them in others. For one, you have to realize that the performance numbers of the 980ti and the TitanX are very close and losing to the Titan X or beating the 980ti will probably also have you losing to the 980ti or beating the TitanX, still following? ;)

Based on the shader increase only the Fury X should be competitive to NVidias highest end cards.

I do think 4GB is not really enough, objectively 4GB for 4K with future games, it's not realistic. I understand that AMD may not have the R&D down for 8GB HBM so they may not have the choice. I hope DX12 will help with future-proofing the 4GB HBM, only time will tell.

I have a 1080p monitor and getting a min framerate of 60fps in every game at max graphics is my goal so I don't mind the 4GB of VRAM but that's just me.

I don't think it's about 4K monitors but about VR headsets, those start at 2.5K or so but next generation offerings might up it a bit.
As for the need for more RAM, they do have that direct system RAM mapping and fast transferring, and streaming textures, and their newish compression techniques for textures which is suppose to fix the need for a lot of RAM in newer games. Suppose to I say, but will it work out?
It's a tricky thing because MS and sony also thought they were alright with their consoles, but even at E3 and with fancy demo videos I notice some poor resolution on textures on a regular basis, so that illustrates that whatever the experts predict is perfectly fine might not be quite that fine.
But as you say, that is for if you actually use 4K displays/future VR headsets and are a bit nitpicky

As for 8GB HBM, I think it's too tricky (low yield/heat issues/cost?) to start with that I would guess. But it does feel odd that my 2011 GFX card has 3GB and 4GB would be enough for now. Plus I didn't even touch on the non-game uses graphics cards have these days through directcompute and OpenCL and such. But oh well.
 
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
208 (0.04/day)
System Name Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Processor Ryzen 5 5600 @4.65 GHz
Motherboard Asus ROG X570-E
Cooling Thermalright
Memory 32 GB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RX 6700XT 12 GB Dual
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus
Display(s) LG 23MP67HQ + LG 55 Inch 4K
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply CM V1000
Calm down ....

 
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
67 (0.01/day)
System Name Max LGA775 SLI
Processor Q9650 @ 4.401Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte EP45-UD3P
Cooling NH-D14
Memory G.Skill DDR2 "Pi" 9600
Video Card(s) GTX 285 SLI (756/1692/1350)
Storage Crucial C300 128Gb SSD, 4 x 1Tb HD
Display(s) Samsung T260, T260HD
Case HAF 932
Power Supply Antec TPQ-1200
Software Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
GG, It's over. Nvidia is finished.
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
528 (0.11/day)
System Name As Himself
Processor 2700X
Motherboard Asrock 370X ThaiChi
Cooling Custom Liquid
Memory 4133MHz Team
Video Card(s) Radeon VII
Storage Samsung 512 SSD's
Display(s) Asus "24 144Hz
Case Tt P5
Audio Device(s) Asus Essence One Muses/Sparkos
Power Supply EVGA 1200
Mouse RAT ProX
Keyboard Drop CTRL
Software W10 steam futuremark
this sucks. I use 5400x1080 (5k portrait eyefinity)for my sim racing. I really wanted the new fury cards, but I may have to go with a couple 390x's instead...
 
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
208 (0.04/day)
System Name Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Processor Ryzen 5 5600 @4.65 GHz
Motherboard Asus ROG X570-E
Cooling Thermalright
Memory 32 GB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RX 6700XT 12 GB Dual
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus
Display(s) LG 23MP67HQ + LG 55 Inch 4K
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply CM V1000
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
86 (0.02/day)
That's a game Nvidia wins. The Fury X is an expensive piece of hardware with still pricey HBM, a pretty complicated manufacturing process, and that AIO liquid cooler. I'd be amazed if AMD was making anywhere near what Nvidia is making per sale with the 980 Ti. If Nvidia drops the 980 Ti even to $600 it hurts AMD. Dropping it to something like $550 and knocking $50 off all their cards on the way down makes AMD irrelevant at most price points...
it's nice to see people wanting so much something that they end up believing it's true.

The deal here is that they cut down costs from buying memory chips,
cutting down costs from the complex pcb/larger pcb, e.t.c.
That's why an 8-core Arm soc costs like 5$ and
while an 8-core Arm cpu and a dGPU and a dModem and a dWifi module e.t.c. will cost each 5$ plus the cost to design the pcb and put them together.
Companies are integrating Ram controllers, southbridges, northbridges, networking staff, accelerator and many other things into 1 piece of silicon... because it's dirty cheap.
Sorry to burst your bubble, live with it.
 

HavocNME

New Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
This is going to sound stupid but they had multiple memory chips on these boards in the last series, so why can't they put two 4GB HBM stacks on one card to make 8GB of memory until the 8GB HBM stack is perfected?
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
361 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
This is going to sound stupid but they had multiple memory chips on these boards in the last series, so why can't they put two 4GB HBM stacks on one card to make 8GB of memory until the 8GB HBM stack is perfected?

That will make for a much bigger GPU package, consequences of that may include lower yields and higher failure rates. Because the memory is integrated into the GPU package, if memory fails you bin the whole lot. There's no salvaging of the GPU.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.66/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
854 (0.17/day)
This is going to sound stupid but they had multiple memory chips on these boards in the last series, so why can't they put two 4GB HBM stacks on one card to make 8GB of memory until the 8GB HBM stack is perfected?


It's not a stupid question but it is a question that's difficult to answer. For one AMD seems to have 4 stacks of 1GB/8Gbit HBM on the substrate. Answering the question of why they can't just use 2GB/16Gbit stacks or some other mixture is difficult to answer since it would require someone to look for technical papers on HBM or have a direct engineer working in the field give us the answer. I'll admit that I didn't search for the answer for myself but if I were to speculate, going from the top of the pyramid, it's either too expensive, too difficult or just not ready (R&D). There's a multitude of reasons that could affect these options, like I said I didn't do the research, i could give you all the reasons I think they couldn't do 8GB but they would all be speculation, winded and just take a lot of time to explain when I have to type it. :p
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
2,972 (0.61/day)
System Name Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor 2500K / 6600K
Motherboard ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s) BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
What kind of car do you have?
Ford Focus XR5 Turbo 2012. It is referred to as the Ford Focus ST in Europe. I reside in Australia.

I never knew that Nvidia was planning on a mini version of the Titan. Is that even true ?
I also believe that AMD put a lot of time and effort into the new Fury, looking forward to its release and some benchmarks.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,654 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
AMD slides, AMD favored games, AMD in game settings and the difference bar a few games is insignificant. Not too good at $650. Let's see how they OC. The custom OCed 980TIs like the Gigabyte monster for 40$ more should be well above Fury X.


Wow.

Batman, AC:U, FC4, and others are Nvidia titles.

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/far-cry-4-nvidia-gameworks-trailer

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-unity-graphics-and-performance-guide

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/batman-arkham-origins-graphics-and-performance-guide

But whatever you like to think so you sleep better at night.
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2012
Messages
361 (0.08/day)
Location
South Africa
Processor Pentium II 400 @ 516MHz
Motherboard AOpen AX6BC EZ
Cooling Stock
Memory 192MB PC-133
Video Card(s) 2x Voodoo 12MB in SLI, S3 Trio64V+
Storage Maxtor 40GB
Display(s) ViewSonic E90
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster 16
Software Windows 98 SE
Ford Focus XR5 Turbo 2012. It is referred to as the Ford Focus ST in Europe. I reside in Australia.

I never knew that Nvidia was planning on a mini version of the Titan. Is that even true ?
I also believe that AMD put a lot of time and effort into the new Fury, looking forward to its release and some benchmarks.

Look at the date of the Titan Mini article :p
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,601 (0.79/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
Look at the date of the Titan Mini article :p
Ahh i just realized, it's an April fools joke. Sorry mate, i did not notice that because i don't care much for April fools day.
If you ask me, in the technology world it seems like everyday is April fools day. Drivers every April and everyone is a fool. :)
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,010 (0.24/day)
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I have only one objection. And that's nothing for graphic card.
But they really should launch normal simple tubes, same as on CORSAIR H100i example.
Without this bad and cheap sleeve. Everything else is great.
I even think that reference R9-390X 8GB from pictures are best designed AMD reference cards ever.
Much better than last year and HD7970.
ASUS will probably decide to offer something ROG from Fury X and R9-390X 8GB.
Probably Poseidon models. But maybe even they improve AIO design and invest little more money in that.
But OK they want to offer for 550-650$ same as TITAN X for 1000$ and they save little money.
Radiator could be cubic as Coolstream PE, some similar type, normal tubes, but that would be probably more expensive cards.
Anyway I think many people will decide to buy Air model, Fury X for 550$.
At least card will offer excellent gaming for 1080p and 1440p resolution. Than when become possible AMD will launch and Fury X 8GB, immediately, same as R9-290X.
For same price only little later.
That's some other politic little than NVIDIA. NVIDIA completely trained their fans, now poor people even justify sabotage of 1 years old premium card.
They say "NVIDIA need to earn somehow money"... Poor NVIDIA, they will bankrupt probably if big part of people who bought 780Ti decide to keep card longer.
Because of that they need to sabotage fps on 780Ti and for people that's OK. Like only NVIDIA want profit, as AMD and Intel don't need but didn't done something like that.

It's not always question who make better chip, in theory GTX780Ti is better chip than Hawaii, I mean full GK110.
But NVIDIA spoil own chip to force people forward... Hawaii now have and 8GB and higher fps than GTX780Ti... and what AMD don't need money...
Rumors say they will bankrupt max at 2020-2021 if something not change. Much worse financial situation, much less hype, much harder earn money and didn't done that.
AMD everything what they earn is on hard work, but NVIDIA big part is hype, and rich gamers allow to NVIDIA experiment with Shield, Tegra, etc...with their money.

Situation is now... GTX980Ti should cost 50$ less than Fury X, custom GTX980Ti models can't be more expensive than Fury X custom models.
TITAN X worth maybe 100-150$ more than Fury X. But only if benchmark tests are real. We don't know still.
24h after NVIDIA presentation people could look 10 unboxing video clips with different models and performance in details for most important models, even pictures for custom cards are available soon.
Now after 4 day, still very little about whole series.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
306 (0.05/day)
Location
EU
I said earlier that €500 is my limit for a graphics card, but when I think about it you do normally pay a good 100 for a watercooler, so I guess one should take that into account when determining limits. And when comparing to other cards too
 
Top