• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon R9 Fury Specifications Leaked

Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
217 (0.05/day)
Location
Ottawa, Canada
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel 12700K@5.1GHz
Motherboard MSI Pro Z790-P
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 360mm
Memory 2x16GB DDR5-6000 G.Skill Trident Z RGB
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming X Trio 6800 16GB
Storage 1TB SSD
Case Cooler Master Storm Striker
Power Supply Antec True Power 750w
Keyboard IBM Model 'M"
It would be silly not to keep 4GB. R9-290X had 4GB. My ancient HD7950 had 3GB. Nano having the same as so much older HD7950 would be silly and just 2GB would be just plain dumbest thing ever...

They have to keep the full 4GB, because HBM1 only comes in a configuration for 4GB. HBM2 will allow for 8GB.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
4,179 (1.15/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer
Processor i7 10700K 5.1ghz (24/7) / 2x Xeon E52650v2
Motherboard Asus Strix Z490 / Dell Dual Socket (R720)
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop / Dell Stock
Memory Corsair RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / DDR3 128gb 16 x 8gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector)
Storage Samsung 970 1tb NVME and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5
Display(s) Acer XG270HU, Samsung G7 Odyssey (1440p 240hz)
Case Thermaltake Cube / Dell Poweredge R720 Rack Mount Case
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt / Dell Stock 750 / Brick
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows Server 2016
Well what will matter is how close it is to the Fury X this go round. Its price while not announced is probably going to be around $550 so if its performance falls around the less than 10% difference mark it will be a great video card!

I hope to see some non-reference PCB versions so we can get some more overclocking especially once voltage is unlocked by the other programs (MSI afterburner or the likes).
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.46/day)
Location
So. Cal.
There won't be a reference R9 Fury board, so I just used whatever pic from my AMD 300 folder.
You'd almost have to think even custom cards (non reference) would (at least at first) be base off the same FuryX PCB. If there's not a "reference" you'd think AMD probably hasn't made a longer PCB version. I suppose AIB could've made custom PCB as mounting an interposer might actually be easier than a GPU die/memory... the AIB might like that better. Actually the PCB might be cheaper and easier to make as basically they just need to hook the power and display outputs to the interposer. Either way the cooler and fans should still be fairly substantial, perhaps not like a 390X, but still need some beef. So might we see the short FuryX PCB and then cooler that just overhangs?
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
I HOPE that isn't a Real image of the new Card......It wouldn't be too reassuring, if they didn't even get the "RADEON" logo affixed in the correct orientation. Assuming of course that they would WANT the buyers to see Radeon upright, and NOT Upside down, when the card was installed.

The RADEON text is turned this way so it looks nice on PR photo where the card is placed with the fan intake up. Similar to how Fury X had inverted text for press but was the other way around on actual cards because they have to look nice inside the case...
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,973 (0.77/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600 / 16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, NVMes everywhere / NVMes, more NVMes / Various storage, SATA SSD mostly
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / Coolermaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10 / Windows 7
4096?


What's to stop people from putting a water cooler on Nano and overclocking it to Fury X specs then? If the chip weren't cut down, the clockspeed would have to be about 60% of Fury X to be close to 390X.
Only one 8pin power connector.

The Four Faces of Fiji, & Quantum Too - The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Review: Aiming For the Top

Unlike the R9 Fury, AMD has announced the bulk of the specs for the R9 Nano. This card will feature a fully enabled Fiji GPU
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,944 (2.61/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
For once, AMD designs a very sexy reference card, assuming thats what the card will actually look like.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
If R9 Nano will have the grunt of R9-290/390X with a single 8-pin power input and that size with low noise, it might be a win. We could see the rise of high end HTPC's. Imagine Steam Machine with R9 Nano...
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
For once, AMD designs a very sexy reference card, assuming thats what the card will actually look like.
The RADEON text is turned this way so it looks nice on PR photo where the card is placed with the fan intake up. Similar to how Fury X had inverted text for press but was the other way around on actual cards because they have to look nice inside the case...
I HOPE that isn't a Real image of the new Card......It wouldn't be too reassuring, if they didn't even get the "RADEON" logo affixed in the correct orientation. Assuming of course that they would WANT the buyers to see Radeon upright, and NOT Upside down, when the card was installed.
At least 3 people didn't read the thread and posted right off the bat. :)
There won't be a reference R9 Fury board, so I just used whatever pic from my AMD 300 folder.
 

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,944 (2.61/day)
Location
Loveland, CO
System Name Ryzen Reflection
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling 2x EK PE360 | TechN AM4 AMD Block Black | EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G | 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage WD SN850 500GB (OS) | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) | Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s) Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS | Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS | Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case Lian Li PC-011D XL | Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s) FiiO K7 | Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard Razer Huntsman Tournament Edition
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
If the ROP count stays the same on the Fury, we could be looking at a very decent option with price/performance in mind.
I am very interested to see what happens when this comes out. Even more interested to see the Nano, so much talk about it.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
We read the thread just fine. But normal R9 Fury is just meh at this point. If anything I'm interested about R9 Nano since they were very secretive the whole time till now about it...
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,654 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Huh. I wonder if the smaller ratio of shaders and TMUs to ROPs will show as any tangible benefit. I eagerly await a review. :)


If it was anything like it's siblings in GCN and the leave the ROP count it could be the card to have and tweak
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,316 (0.31/day)
Processor i7-13700k
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts. 180-190watt draw)
Storage 1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s) Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service)
Mouse Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard Logitech G710+
They have to keep the full 4GB, because HBM1 only comes in a configuration for 4GB. HBM2 will allow for 8GB.
HBM2 will allow up to 32GB
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,645 (0.56/day)
Ha ha ha.


That "ancient" 7950 is built on the same node as the 9xx and 3xx series. It's preposterous to call something that is functionally only a revision, and not a revolution, out dated.



Seriously though, AMD releasing another air cooled monster that should probably come with a glass window (so you can see it toasting your food) isn't new. It's kind of a good laugh, and I'm sure Nvidia fans are absolutely salivating over how this "definitively proves" Nvidia is better than AMD.


My opinion hasn't changed. I'm looking forward to you 4xx and 1xxx series. Maybe nano will create some ripples, but we need a new node to see any real leap in performance.
 
D

Deleted member 138597

Guest
When the Fury X was showing up on tech news sites "...coming with HBM", "HBM offers 512Gb/s bandwith..." "...could be 980 Ti killer" "unprecedented 4K performance..." etc etc, we were all like "ooh" "aah" for it. And when the reviews showed... well, you know about that :rolleyes:.

So, it's kinda the same thing again, this time with Fury.

54 CUs, 3584 Stream processors, 224 TMU, probably 64 ROPs - hmmm, looks good.

.....
NOP! NOT TAKING ANY CHANCES THIS TIME :slap:
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
When the Fury X was showing up on tech news sites "...coming with HBM", "HBM offers 512Gb/s bandwith..." "...could be 980 Ti killer" "unprecedented 4K performance..." etc etc, we were all like "ooh" "aah" for it. And when the reviews showed... well, you know about that :rolleyes:.

So, it's kinda the same thing again, this time with Fury.

54 CUs, 3584 Stream processors, 224 TMU, probably 64 ROPs - hmmm, looks good.

.....
NOP! NOT TAKING ANY CHANCES THIS TIME :slap:
The question is not necessarily performance, but price point. Proper pricing can make nVidia adjust pricing to be more competitive. Once again though, that depends on price and how it scales up with its direct competitor. So while Fury X might not have wiped the floor, Fury might prove to be a different animal for the price.

What's interesting is fewer shaders and TMUs but, the same number of ROPs. It kind of adds a strange dynamic to the matter. I'm more interested in the difference in performance between Fury and Fury X at the same clocks. Then we can do some math to find out exactly how much those TMUs and shaders are contributing to extra performance at any given resolution (given benchmark info,) and could help solidify the position that 64 ROPs is simply too few for a card with that much compute.
 

johnspack

Here For Good!
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
5,979 (0.99/day)
Location
Nelson B.C. Canada
System Name System2 Blacknet , System1 Blacknet2
Processor System2 Threadripper 1920x, System1 2699 v3
Motherboard System2 Asrock Fatality x399 Professional Gaming, System1 Asus X99-A
Cooling System2 Noctua NH-U14 TR4-SP3 Dual 140mm fans, System1 AIO
Memory System2 64GBS DDR4 3000, System1 32gbs DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) System2 GTX 980Ti System1 GTX 970
Storage System2 4x SSDs + NVme= 2.250TB 2xStorage Drives=8TB System1 3x SSDs=2TB
Display(s) 2x 24" 1080 displays
Case System2 Some Nzxt case with soundproofing...
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar U7 MKII
Power Supply System2 EVGA 750 Watt, System1 XFX XTR 750 Watt
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Ducky
Software Manjaro, Windows 10, Kubuntu 23.10
Benchmark Scores It's linux baby!
God, anything that drops the prices of even used 970s ect. They still want 400can for a clearly midrange product up here in Canada. 270us for a used one... nope.
I need at least a 970 to upgrade from my 480. No new games for me...... Top end used to be 500+ dollar cards like my 480, now it's 700-1200? I can't even buy used
cards I can afford now. Crap.
 

Ebo

Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
778 (0.20/day)
Location
Nykoebing Mors, Denmark
System Name the little fart
Processor AMD Ryzen 2600X
Motherboard MSI x470 gaming plus
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaw 2400Mhz DDR 4
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX Vega 56 Pulse
Storage 1 Crucial MX100 512GB SSD,1 Crucial MX500 2TB SSD, 1 1,5TB WD Black Caviar, 1 4TB WD RED HD
Display(s) IIyama XUB2792QSU IPS 2560x1440
Case White Lian-Li PC-011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar SE pci-e card
Power Supply Thermaltake DPS G 1050 watt Digital PSU
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard Corsair K70
Software windows 10 64 pro bit
I just wanna see if this card is a better buy/upgrade from my R9 290 from Sapphire than going for a 2nd R9 290 in crossfire.
 
Joined
Sep 28, 2012
Messages
963 (0.23/day)
System Name Poor Man's PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Motherboard MSI B650M Mortar WiFi
Cooling ID Cooling SE 206 XT
Memory 32GB GSkill Flare X5 DDR5 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 6800 XT
Storage XPG Gammix S70 Blade 2TB + 8 TB WD Ultrastar DC HC320
Display(s) Mi Gaming Curved 3440x1440 144Hz
Case Cougar MG120-G
Audio Device(s) MPow Air Wireless + Mi Soundbar
Power Supply Enermax Revolution DF 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 3
Keyboard Logitech Pro X + Kailh box heavy pale blue switch + Durock stabilizers
VR HMD Meta Quest 2
Benchmark Scores Who need bench when everything already fast?
I just wanna see if this card is a better buy/upgrade from my R9 290 from Sapphire than going for a 2nd R9 290 in crossfire.

TBH,two R9 290 are faster and cheaper than single R9 Fury X,throw water on them and overclock and they will perform closed to R9 295X2.Great performance scales across all games I even tempted to get another Asus's R9 290 to three firing them.Judging from your display,you might not need more juices,i say single R9 290 sufficient enough.

-= edited =-
Some proof from Shadow of Mordor
Setting :





Single



Crossfire

 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 138597

Guest
TBH,two R9 290 are faster and cheaper than single R9 Fury X,throw water on them and overclock and they will perform closed to R9 295X2.Great performance scales across all games I even tempted to get another Asus's R9 290 to three firing them.Judging from your display,you might not need more juices,i say single R9 290 sufficient enough.

-= edited =-
Some proof from Shadow of Mordor
Setting :





Single



Crossfire


Just imagine the heat output... let alone the power consumption :eek:
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Remember, Fury X2 is still en route. It's going to crush Titan X.
 
Joined
Jun 13, 2012
Messages
1,316 (0.31/day)
Processor i7-13700k
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz
Video Card(s) Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts. 180-190watt draw)
Storage 1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate
Display(s) Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz
Power Supply Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service)
Mouse Logitech G502 hero
Keyboard Logitech G710+

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
X2 cards usually get at least 160% performance compared to the single GPU model. Fury X is about 10-15% away from Titan X. Simple math is simple but it isn't an apples to apples comparison. A Titan X2 would certainly best the Fury X2. At the same time, Fiji has a huge real estate advantage over Maxwell. A dual GPU Titan X would likely have to reduce GDDR5 memory amount simply to make room for the second GPU; moreover, Fiji's size opens the possibility for a tri-GPU card but power and heat management would obviously become problematical.
 
D

Deleted member 138597

Guest
Remember, Fury X2 is still en route. It's going to crush Titan X.

X2 cards usually get at least 160% performance compared to the single GPU model. Fury X is about 10-15% away from Titan X. Simple math is simple but it isn't an apples to apples comparison. A Titan X2 would certainly best the Fury X2. At the same time, Fiji has a huge real estate advantage over Maxwell. A dual GPU Titan X would likely have to reduce GDDR5 memory amount simply to make room for the second GPU; moreover, Fiji's size opens the possibility for a tri-GPU card but power and heat management would obviously become problematical.

Wait, did you just contradicted yourself? Or is it another you talking? I really thought it was somebody else saying that :laugh: (no offence though...)
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.65/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Where is the contradiction?
 
Top