UNIGINE-Valley BENCHMARK scores

[the54thvoid]

ah...simple mistake...easily made. ill delete mine.

In a crazy tab closing hurricane I've seemingly deleted my posts! But I was going to point you to here:

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/unigine-heaven-4-0-benchmark-scores.198888/page-43

EDIT: nope, it's still there - crazy browser nonsense.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Before & After OC. Core @ (1100Mhz Memory @ 1450MhzOC)

 

[purecain]

well I decided to give my asus maximus and 4770k a push and ive ended up back at 4.4ghz @1.25 24/7... I can run 4.6 @ 1.28 but heat becomes an issue which causes BSOD.

anyway happy that I have my cpu subsystems tuned im now looking back at the gpu and even though im happy. i'll be happier when ive watercooled the card and bought a second....

my system is calling out for a second titan x... or it could be the morphine... either way... im enjoying playing with my toys atm...

 

[Anarchy]

Greetings
Tested new stock 390X - GIGABYTE GV-R939XG1 GAMING-8GD on PC from 2008
Do not know why such low result. Maybe because it is only on pcie 1 generation, slow CPU or why it shows only 4GB vram?

 

[Lui Leyland Robert]

Greetings
Tested new stock 390X - GIGABYTE GV-R939XG1 GAMING-8GD on PC from 2008
Do not know why such low result. Maybe because it is only on pcie 1 generation, slow CPU or why it shows only 4GB vram?
View attachment 66505

Because Unigine Valley is 32bit application , so it can't allocate VRAM larger than 4GB ( I guest )

 

[Caring1]

Do not know why such low result. Maybe because it is only on pcie 1 generation, slow CPU or why it shows only 4GB vram?

I would be looking at the card first, check the part and serial numbers on it.

 

[GreiverBlade]

Because Unigine Valley is 32bit application , so it can't allocate VRAM larger than 4GB ( I guest )

32bit limitation is more for RAM than vRAM iirc (tho final fantasy heavensward show 3072mb on my 980 and not 4096 and it's also a 32bit bench iirc)

I would be looking at the card first, check the part and serial numbers on it.

totally agreed ... i hope it's not a 4gb version painted in a 8gb manner ...

 

[MrGenius]

Ok, back again. As stated in the Heaven thread, I've noticed some pretty significant changes with the 2 most recent builds of W10. Namely more OC headroom and higher framerates in 3D apps. And I'm finally getting around to doing some benching to see what I've got going on now. I haven't been able to bump my core/mem speed up from last time(unlike with Heaven). BUT...I did get 85 more points with the same as last time(same everything including 15.3 beta driver). NICE!

Still have yet to thoroughly test the WHQL 15.7 driver too. Which may or may not be of any additional benefit. We'll see.

E8600 @ 3.33GHZ + 280X @ 1200/1850 = 2208 SCORE BELOW IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY

Well, well, well. What's good for the Heaven is good for the Valley too! What did I get for my upgrade to the 15.7 drivers? Only another 77 POINTS!!!

E8600 @ 3.33GHz + 280X @ 1200/1850 = 2285 PLEASE USE SCORE BELOW FOR THE RECORD

That'll have to do for now. But I shall return very soon with my newly acquired 3570K. See ya then!

 

[purecain]

DX12'3 iterations doubles frame rate due to a massive increased call count to the gpu for operations that were previously done on cpu.

so now im patiently waiting for a cool dx12 title to be released so we can get a new benchmark as all of the old dx stuff is about to become obsolete.

I still cant believe the massive improvement.

if you havnt looked up dx12 and windows 10 its time to start. pc gaming FTW.

 

[bozo6]

KR0N0S---AMD FX-8350 @ 4.51GHz ---- GALAX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 HOF V2 4GB ---- FPS: Min. 24.1 Max: 136.1--- Score: 3537
I hope this is a worthwhile bench.

 

[MrGenius]

What's weird is how the 3D performance suddenly got boosted so dramatically with builds 10162 and 10166 of the W10 tech/insider preview. I was like "wait a second...what's going on here? Something's different...what's the deal with my GPU? This just isn't right...something needs tweaked again. It's acting like it needs less volts, or more core speed...or something...I think. The stability is definitely gone now...for some reason. God damn it...what have they done to me now? Well...maybe it's a good thing. Let's see if cranking the core up a tad more works. Hold on...I think it's working. How is this possible? Am I seriously able to stabilize this thing with +10MHz to the core now? But...but...huh? Anyway....how can that be a bad thing right? Ok...I think I've got that figured. But how is everything looking so much faster/smoother now? Surely adding 10MHz wouldn't make that much of a difference. Let's check some fps. Well I'll be dipped in shit! They're better alright! Way better than they should be. Unbelievable! Wait 'til they get a load of this! Hell...it's actually too good to be true. They probably won't even believe me. Oh well...their loss if they don't." And now, with this 15.7 driver on top of it all, I'm practically speechless. How on Earth have they managed to pull this trick off? Ha! I don't know and I don't care! Just let the good times roll baby! I ain't looking no gift horse in the mouth. Let somebody else do the math.

I'm downloading build 10176 as we speak. I can't get enough of this good stuff. Get it while it's hot!
http://getintopc.com/softwares/operating-systems/windows-10-build-10176-iso-64-bit-free-download/

Oh...it's ON now!!! Yeeeehaaaw!!! Full tilt boogie son! Get some!

 

[HammerON]

Stock run on the GPU

 

[Tatty_Two]

^^^ Show off!

 

[Caring1]

here is the valley ultra preset results

It says extreme hd, and you used 8xAA instead of 4.

 

[Caring1]

ohh was I supposed to use a different mode?
Extreme HD with 4X AA? or what should I select?

All the settings are shown in the first post.

 

[nunyabuisness]

fixed sorry bout that

I just got my Son a R9 380 G1 gaming Gigabyte card as his 290 started getting really unstable. so we binned it. ordered a TI hybrid from EVGA. So we got this stand in.

We were actually very surprised we got GTA V at 1440P running really well at high/ultra settings. with no AA and no AF and low post processing. 60 FPS ALL DAY! really good card

here is the valley ultra preset results
with an Overclock from 990mhz to 1000mhz. and the Memory from 1425mhz to 1500mhz. +5mv added and power limit of +20% was needed otherwise the GPU core would drop to 960mhz

 

[xkm1948]

5820K with Fury X.

 

[Aquinus]

Well, I gave my new 390 a little push. 1140Mhz from the stock 1040. It seemed to take it really well however power consumption jumped to about the same amount both of my old 6870s used to use together! Most definitely a warm GPU the 390 is but, if you can keep it cool it seemed to perform pretty well. The card seems to like downclock for the fraction of a second between scenes, which I found amusing.

 

[Tatty_Two]

^^^^ That's a nice score, considering it's an improved refresh of the 290 it's not that far short of a 290X, I am around 3500..... nice.

 

[bozo6]

KR0N0S---AMD FX-8350 @ 5.01GHz ---- GALAX NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 HOF V2 4GB ---- FPS: Min. 24.4 Max: 147.5--- Score: 3661
Better score running at 5.0GHz.

 

[the54thvoid]

Stock run on the GPU

What tweaks/settings do you use? (as in do you kill unwanted processes etc)

My 980ti Kingpin at 1502Mhz core and 7500Mhz mem, with 3930k at 4.2Ghz only gets me this:

FTR - I know what I bought when I bought it and I knew I wouldn't use it to it's potential but it's nearly as fast as my previous 780ti's (at 129fps on Valley).

 

[Ferrum Master]

I hopping in...

 

[SimpleTECH]

i7-4770K @ 4.4GHz, Gigabyte R9 290 WindForce 3X OC @ 1135/1625

 

[Aquinus]

Not very happy right now. Same clocks and everything, only changes were Windows 10 and newer driver. It hurt my score by almost 250 points.
/me grumbles.

 

[R-T-B]

I've noticed that synthetic benchmarks don't like Windows 10. Games however seem to benefit in minimum FPS. I'll take that over scores anyday.