- Joined
- Jul 25, 2006
- Messages
- 12,130 (1.87/day)
- Location
- Nebraska, USA
System Name | Brightworks Systems BWS-6 E-IV |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-6600 @ 3.9GHz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 Rev 1.0 |
Cooling | Quality case, 2 x Fractal Design 140mm fans, stock CPU HSF |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR4 3000 Corsair Vengeance |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GEForce GTX 1050Ti 4Gb GDDR5 |
Storage | Samsung 850 Pro 256GB SSD, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB SSD |
Display(s) | Samsung S24E650BW LED x 2 |
Case | Fractal Design Define R4 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova 550W G2 Gold |
Mouse | Logitech M190 |
Keyboard | Microsoft Wireless Comfort 5050 |
Software | W10 Pro 64-bit |
Again, you are not listening and you pick tidbits out of context. Cable pulling was an example. I don't do it. I have people with certs do the dirty work. And that is not to demean them because I hire only very qualified techs too. When setting up a new network in a facility, it still must be done and I expect it to be done correctly, the first time. And they get paid well to do it right too. But the project manager still gets paid more because he is responsible to ensure all those techs (and the programmers too, sysadmins, security, etc.) do their jobs right too.If I'm to be brutally honest, you have a non-technical position in an entry level area of IT.
Cable installation and monitoring software is about the most entry level job available in the industry.
And I didn't say "monitoring software". I said "setup monitoring, establish metrics, conduct the statistical analysis, create the training program, report status to executive management, then train our replacements". That is quite a bit above an entry-level position of someone who just watches a screen looking for problems.
And if you think establishing network monitoring on a secure, statewide distributive network tied to a state's mainframe is entry level, then you don't understand the complexity of such a WAN/intranet. Those "monitors" are really "controllers" and sysadmins for the distributive computing side, and the mainframe interface too.
You have made it clear you think you know the "whole" industry PM, but I am sorry, it is clear you don't. You may understand your company, but that is not how the global industry works.
Exactly. The degree establishes the foundation, but is much more than that. It is stepping stone to branch out into many areas because to get a degree you already demonstrated an ability to learn and accomplish a variety of things.For Comp Sci, the degree is a much more of a foundation to build off of. You can learn to develop software and still not know 60% of what you would learn by getting a degree. There are some theoretical aspects that help you avoid certain problems or be able to identify something before it becomes a thing. Just as the name state, it's the science of computers, sometimes it's practical and applied and sometimes it's not but, as a developer you'll always be better for it.
There are things to be said for skills such as algorithm analysis and being able to mathematically calculate how long your code will (roughly,) take to run based on the operations being done. These things do have a purpose in the field and can make your life easier given the right task. Simple point is, you don't know what you're missing when you've never had it. I couldn't imagine doing my job now without that expertise.
Side note: I had minimal English courses to get my degree. It was mostly Comp Sci, Math, Science, and Philosophy with abundance in that order (most to least.)
As for English, I did not mean to imply a CompSci, IT, Applied Electronics, etc. gives you a minor in English. By advanced, I meant above normal "high school" level. Sorry for not making that clear. As you noted you still had to take some English classes to get your degree. Mine, for example, was not a straight-up English class, but Technical writing.
It is not a matter about talent, intelligence, or abilities. It is about opportunities. Doors that open that never would otherwise.there are a lot of very talented people out there who have not got degrees
They don't! Unless it is a family owned business. But formal qualifications does not imply just certs. And BTW, this education culture is not different between here in the US or in NZ, or Europe. The certs are the same. While the names of a 4 year degree may be different, they mean the same too. IT means the same thing here and there and everywhere. Ethernet and wireless networks work the same. PCs work the same. The Internet works the same. The technologies are the same. And it takes the same skills, knowledge and expertise to build, maintain, and manage them all.Pill Monster said:Actually just thinking about it, how does anyone without formal qualifications get a job over there?
But again, if you are like Pill Monster's coworkers and are not concerned the future, stick with certs, do your job correctly, and you surely make a nice living.
Yeah right! Open your eyes and look around you. All around you - not just in your work place and see who is making the big money. Who will be secure when they take their early retirement. Who will be working, out of necessity, into their 70s and beyond. Stop trying to fool yourselves.Pill Monster said:Absolutely 100%jester said:Formal degrees are just paper.
See that E7 in my sig. That means I was Enlisted, not a commissioned officer. That means I was the tech doing the actual work. Then I got my degree and moved into management - and higher pay. Again, I have been on both sides of the fence, and the big money, the one that lets me retire without worries, is on this side.
And again, there are always exceptions around, but you cannot count on you being the exception. You must invest for your retirement.