• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Need advice on making benchmark charts fast!!!

How should video cards be ranked in the charts?

  • From top to bottom list video cards from newest to oldest, from high-end to low end:

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
762 (0.14/day)
System Name Lenovo 17IMH05H
Processor Core i7 10750H
Video Card(s) GTX 1660 Ti
Audio Device(s) SSL2
Software Windows 10 Pro 22H2
Benchmark Scores i've got a shitload of them in 15 years of TPU membership
I am about to finally post a long coming benchmark that contains results from a bunch of mid-range NVIDIA video cards several generations in-between them: GTX460, GTX660, GTX660 Ti, GTX670, GTX760, GTX960.

There are two options how i could make a chart containing a single game results.

1. From top to bottom list video cards from newest to oldest, from high-end to low end:

GTX960
GTX760
GTX670
GTX660 Ti
GTX660
GTX460

2. From top to bottom list video cards from fastest to slowest in that current game, no mater generation or tier:

Scenario 1 (result in some of the games)

GTX960
GTX670
GTX760
GTX660 Ti
GTX660
GTX460

Scenario 2 ( result in some of the games)

GTX670
GTX960
GTX660 Ti
GTX760
GTX660
GTX460

There is no question that GTX460 and GTX660 will be below the rest, however, GTX660 Ti and GTX760 were trading blows in the mid section while GTX670 and GTX960 were trading blows in the high section, so i am not sure by what order should i place the cards..

Your opinion?
 

manofthem

WCG-TPU Team All-Star!
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,960 (2.26/day)
Location
Florida
Processor 3900X @ 4.0
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E
Cooling DeepCool Castle 360EX
Memory G Skill Trident Z Neo 32GB 3600
Video Card(s) RX 5700 XT Pulse
Storage Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB
Display(s) LG 34UC88
Case Thermaltake P3
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III 750w
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard G Skill KM570 MX Silver
Software Windows 10 Pro
Seems reviews usually chart the results in order of fastest/highest/best to slowest/lowest/worst. Seems you can go wrong with that method.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.12/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
I'd agree, method 2 fastest to slowest, that's just what I'd prefer to see from benchmark results as that's the whole point of them for the most part.
 
Top