• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

YoY Growth of NAND Flash Demand Bits Will Stay Under 30% from 2022 to 2025 as Demand Slows for PC Client SSDs, Says TrendForce

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,264 (0.92/day)
Client SSDs constituted a major driver of demand bit growth in the NAND Flash market for the past two years as the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were spurring procurement activities related to working and studying from home. TrendForce currently projects that the attach rate of client SSDs among notebook computers will reach 92% in 2022 and around 96% in 2023. However, the demand surge related to the pandemic is subsiding, and the recent headwinds in the global economy have caused a demand freeze in the wider consumer electronics market. Hence, among the major application segments of the NAND Flash market, client SSDs are going to experience the most significant demand slowdown. This, in turn, will constrain demand bit growth as well. TrendForce projects that for the period from 2022 to 2025, the YoY growth rate of NAND Flash demand bits will remain below 30%.

The average NAND Flash content of client SSDs has already surpassed 500 GB this year. Quotes for 512 GB SSDs have fallen sharply and come to a level that is roughly comparable to the quotes that were given for 256 GB SSDs half-a-year ago. In fact, quotes for 512 GB SSDs are also near the level for HDDs with the same capacity. On the other hand, upgrading to 1 TB or higher for notebook SSDs could be challenging for PC OEMs mainly because the licensing fee for the Windows OS has a positive correlation with device specifications. Therefore, an increase in SSD capacity will raise the cost of a whole notebook computer. With PC OEMs being less keen on adopting SSDs that are 1 TB or higher, growth in the average NAND Flash content of client SSDs will also be more limited in the future.




Regarding lower-capacity storage solutions for notebook computers, Microsoft is encouraging PC OEMs to adopt UFS solutions for entry-level notebook computers that come with 128 GB of storage. There are two reasons behind this development. First, the market for 128 GB SSDs are gradually shrinking. Second, compared with SATA, UFS has a price advantage and a comparable performance in terms of data transfer speed. In the long run, UFS solutions could replace low-capacity client SSDs for notebook storage. However, SSDs have experienced a steep price drop recently, so their price difference with UFS solutions has gotten smaller. Furthermore, there are no PC CPU platforms that natively support the faster data transfer speed offered by UFS 3.1. For now, PC OEMs believe there is no need to make the switch since UFS solutions still lack a notable price advantage. Opportunities for adopting UFS solutions will only become more apparent when there is a clear price advantage and native support is available from CPU platforms.

Enterprise SSDs Will Succeed as Major Driver of Demand Bit Growth in Future
The momentum of NAND Flash demand varies for different applications. For instance, demand bit growth has not been as rapid for notebook SSDs as it has been for smartphone storage solutions. This in part has to do with notebook cameras being mainly used for video streaming rather than shooting photos and videos that have a high image quality. TrendForce projects that NAND Flash demand bits related to client SSDs will increase by 4.3% YoY for 2022 and 11.6% YoY for 2023. Turning to the YoY growth rate of the average NAND Flash content of client SSDs, it is projected to reach 18.2% for 2022 and then shrink to 9.6% for 2023. Eventually, enterprise SSDs will take over from client SSDs as a major driver of demand bit growth in the global NAND Flash market.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,897 (1.01/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
If consumer SSDs 4TB and larger were reasonably priced demand would be higher. As it stands right now, you are better off just purchasing enterprise SSDs even as a consumer if you need anything above 2TB
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
8,060 (3.17/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD 7900X3D
Motherboard Asus X670E E Strix
Cooling In Win SR36
Memory GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled)
Storage Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500
Display(s) GIGABYTE FV43U
Case Corsair 7000D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Deepcool 1000M
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121
The Greed coefficient has been heavily applied to SSDs. Unfortunately they seem to think that consumers are brainless and can accept the stupid increase in price when going to 4 TB and above. There is a direct correlation between this article and the reality of SSD. The issue is the most expensive part in an SSD is the controller and you don't need to have more than one controller on a PCB to go even to 16GB on an SSD. They exist too that is the kicker. I will use Corsair's 600MP as an example. The 1TB is $149 and the 2 TB is $269. That is an increase of $120 for another 1 TB of NAND. When you to 4 TB you get that for $799 and that means that you are paying $530 for 2 TB of NAND or $269 per TB for that. Then you can even get 8 TB and that will cost you $1470. For that you are paying $940 for another 4 TB which is a $235 per TB premium. All of them use the same controller. Then let's look at SSDs. The Sandisk Ultra is how old? Right now the 2 TB is $194 and the 4 TB is $406 but it is boxing week and the 2 TB is 49% off it's regular price and the 4 TB is 52% off it's regular price.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2022
Messages
10 (0.02/day)
System Name Trash
Processor Intel Core i7 4700MQ (Wow! It works on 3.4GHz each core!!!)
Motherboard HM86
Cooling One fan two copper pipe
Memory Micron 16GB DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 950M 2GB (Oh! It have 45W TDP!!!) ; Intel HD 4600
Storage WD SA530 512GB
Display(s) LG D02DA (17.3'', TN, 60Hz, 1080P, LVDS)
Case Clevo W670SC
Audio Device(s) two sounds
Power Supply Chicony A17-150P2A
Mouse 双飞燕FG10S
Software Windows10 Professional 22H2
Benchmark Scores 3DMark11 X Graphics Score 1683 CineBench R20 Score 1553
In mainland China, damaged HDDS are refurbished in Huaqiang North and sold as new disks to ordinary users. No bad sector can be detected by DiskGenius, and smart information is cleared. But HDDS usually break after a few months of user use.

I don't know if the same is true outside mainland China. However, in mainland China, such an unhealthy market has given HDD a bad reputation and the market has been further squeezed by SSDS. I'm not a big fan of enterprise SSDS replacing home SSDS, at least not for the next few years. Enterprise SSDS are relatively expensive and difficult to reach in the home market.

Based on the above, I am confident that SSDS will replace HDDS. Seagate and Western Digital are selling SMR HDDS in their low-end product lines. Especially notebooks, CMR HDD is almost hard to see today. In laptops, the replacement of HDDS with SDD has actually begun, and we are seeing more and more laptops remove the 2.5-inch HDD interface.

Both QLC and YMTC's 232 Layer TLC are already available in the market. All of these new technologies are making SSDS cheaper. I think SSDS will eventually replace HDDS completely and be implemented first in the home market.
 
Top