• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 7600 Final Specs and Power Figures Leaked, Uses 6 nm

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,164 (7.57/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Here are the final specifications of the Radeon RX 7600 RDNA3 graphics card, bound for launch later this month. The specs list springs up some surprises. To begin with, while the GPU at the heart of the RX 7600 is based on the latest RDNA3 graphics architecture, it is built on the older 6 nm (DUV) silicon fabrication process—the same one on which the previous "Navi 24" was based. The silicon has a transistor count of 13.3 billion, about 2 billion more than the 7 nm "Navi 23" Powering the RX 6600 series, but a die-size of 204 mm². The GPU has a PCI-Express 4.0 x8 host interface, and a 128-bit GDDR6 memory interface. As the RX 7600, it has a TBP (total board power) value of 165 W, which is over 30 W more than the RX 6600.

At this point, it's not known whether the RX 7600 maxes out the silicon it is based on. It gets 32 RDNA3 compute units (CU), which work out to 2,048 stream processors (with the same dual-issue instruction rate feature as the RX 7900 series); 32 Ray Accelerators, and 64 AI Accelerators. The GPU has 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GPU has 32 MB of second-generation Infinity Cache memory. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory ticks at 18 Gbps, which over the 128-bit memory bus works out to 288 GB/s of memory bandwidth. AMD claims that when coupled with the on-die cache, the "effective bandwidth" is 476.9 GB/s. NVIDIA is putting out similar "effective" figures for its RTX 4060 series, so this could become a norm. The RX 7600 comes with a game frequency of 2250 MHz, and 2625 MHz boost. AMD is making 550 W as its PSU recommendation, compared to the 450 W it did for the RX 6600. The company considers the RX 7600 to be the logical successor of the RX 6600 (and neither the RX 6600 XT nor the RX 6650 XT).



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
261 (0.16/day)
In a honest world this would be consider as a 6650XT replacement, considering current price level, but 6000 series will eventually sold out so I guess that's fair.

Anyway, please for the love of RTG don't price this at $300, get crushed by 4060 on day 1 review, then reduce price bit by bit in following months.
Just release it at $250 and finally compete, please?
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
558 (0.37/day)
Location
Greece
System Name Office / HP Prodesk 490 G3 MT (ex-office)
Processor Intel 13700 (90° limit) / Intel i7-6700
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming H770 Pro / HP 805F H170
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S / Stock
Memory G. Skill Trident XMP 2x16gb DDR5 6400MHz cl32 / Samsung 2x8gb 2133MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC GDDR6X / Zotac GTX 1650 GDDR6 OC
Storage Samsung 2tb 980 PRO MZ / Samsung SSD 1TB 860 EVO + WD blue HDD 1TB (WD10EZEX)
Display(s) Eizo FlexScan EV2455 - 1920x1200 / Panasonic TX-32LS490E 32'' LED 1920x1080
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 8 Pro / HP microtower
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime PX750 / OEM 300W bronze
Mouse MS cheap wired / Logitech cheap wired m90
Keyboard MS cheap wired / HP cheap wired
Software W11 / W7 Pro ->10 Pro
Only looooww pricing can save this card. Otherwise the mediocre (at best) 4060 will crush it, not to mention last generation AMD cards.
 

Ruru

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
12,545 (2.89/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ PBO +200 -20CO
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Arctic Freezer 50, EKWB Vector TUF
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 3080 TUF OC 10GB
Storage A pack of SSDs totaling 3.2TB + 3TB HDDs
Display(s) 27" 4K120 IPS + 32" 4K60 IPS + 24" 1080p60
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless / Corsair HS35
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518 + Asus TUF P1 mousepad
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis
8GB makes sense as this is a lower mid-end card with a 128-bit bus.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
116 (0.04/day)
System Name AMD System
Processor Ryzen 7900 at 180Watts 5650 MHz, vdroop from 1.37V to 1.24V
Motherboard MSI MAG x670 Tomahawk Wifi
Cooling AIO240 for CPU, Wraith Prism's Fan for RAM but suspended above it without touching anything in case.
Memory 32GB dual channel Gskill DDR6000CL30 tuned for CL28, at 1.42Volts
Video Card(s) Msi Ventus 2x Rtx 4070 and Gigabyte Gaming Oc Rtx 4060 ti
Storage Samsung Evo 970
Display(s) Old 1080p 60FPS Samsung
Case Normal atx
Audio Device(s) Dunno
Power Supply 1200Watts
Mouse wireless & quiet
Keyboard wireless & quiet
VR HMD No
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores 1750 points in cinebench 2024 42k 43k gpu cpu points in timespy 50+ teraflops total compute power.
Maybe higher memory not needed with that gpu power? 1080p games need 16GB VRAM?
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
18 (0.01/day)
Maybe higher memory not needed with that gpu power? 1080p games need 16GB VRAM?
Seems like people are paranoid over TLOU benchmark that indicates "8GB cards are dead" despite the extreme low 1% case only appears on ultra settings (I'm talking bout 3070 ofc). On high settings, 3070 could play that game relatively well.

Yeah, more vram is better but again it will drive up the cost. Idk what the price of this card but if it cost > $300, 6700XT is a sweeter deal than this.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,553 (0.66/day)
Location
London, UK
6nm, charging 300 usd and while is slower than 4060, it uses a lot more power than it, meaning failed, even a 4060 has failed at 299 usd, a 199 usd would be the right price for both. I remember when an RX 580 was sold for 199 usd when it was released. Nowadays AMD is charging 600 usd for the x8xx, disgraceful. Nvidia went from 699 usd to a whopping 1299 usd for the x8xx.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
222 (0.08/day)
RTX 4060 is DOA with $300 and only 8GB of vram, if this launches at $250 it is going to be decent value, nothing great, but it will at least be a good alternative for the 4060 and probably be able to sell more, but knowing AMD this is going to end up 5% faster in raster than the RTX 4060 and cost the same and AMD are going to rely on a small 5% performance lead in raster to make up for all the other deficiencies and Nvidia's amazing PR propaganda that is able to brainwash people and sell them overpriced turds!
 
Joined
May 20, 2020
Messages
1,367 (0.84/day)
All these "up to"'s, it's getting ridiculous. Where is a proper product spec? The performance too will be "up to not worthy of buying" I'm sure.
 

tabascosauz

Moderator
Supporter
Staff member
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
8,105 (2.37/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name ab┃ob
Processor 7800X3D┃5800X3D
Motherboard B650E PG-ITX┃X570 Impact
Cooling NH-U12A + T30┃AXP120-x67
Memory 64GB 6400CL32┃32GB 3600CL14
Video Card(s) RTX 4070 Ti Eagle┃RTX A2000
Storage 8TB of SSDs┃1TB SN550
Case Caselabs S3┃Lazer3D HT5
Okay, this shit needs to stop. How is this is any different than Nvidia's spec sheet using large L2 to artificially inflate the 4060's "bandwidth"?

amd effective bandwidth.png


Caches weren't invented yesterday; is the 7800X3D also supposed to use its V-cache to pump up its "effective" DDR5 bandwidth? :shadedshu:
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
230 (0.30/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name Main
Processor 5700X
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar
Cooling Corsair H80i v2
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600MHz CL16
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3060 Ti VENTUS 2X OC 8GB GDDR6X
Display(s) LG 32GK850G
Case NOX HUMMER ZN
Power Supply Seasonic GX-750
Weird times...
New arch + (slightly) smaller node = ~30% higher board power o_O
One can only hope perf/W scales linearly as well
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.43/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
In a honest world this would be consider as a 6650XT replacement, considering current price level, but 6000 series will eventually sold out so I guess that's fair.

Anyway, please for the love of RTG don't price this at $300, get crushed by 4060 on day 1 review, then reduce price bit by bit in following months.
Just release it at $250 and finally compete, please?
It's not a 6600XT replacement, it has the same number of CUs. CU's typically go up a bit of each generation, due to the die shrinks. 7600 is an honest name and it's the first honest name for AMD this generation. Let's hope it will also be a honest price.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2019
Messages
488 (0.26/day)
Effective bandwidth = market speak for blowing pixie dust up People's @$$'es. I might pull the trigger in buying a used 6800XT as they are getting down to the $380.00 range. But to be honest about even doing that feels like a luxury to me as my RX 5700 is breezing along rather cool like too :)
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
2,305 (1.51/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Weird times...
New arch + (slightly) smaller node = ~30% higher board power o_O
One can only hope perf/W scales linearly as well
If you read declared teraflops - yes with a lot. If you make comparison of FPS... will see when reviewed, but I also lose hope.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
1,751 (0.61/day)
It's not a 6600XT replacement, it has the same number of CUs. CU's typically go up a bit of each generation, due to the die shrinks. 7600 is an honest name and it's the first honest name for AMD this generation. Let's hope it will also be a honest price.
Nvidia went down in compute cores on the 4060 and 4060TI compared to the 3060 and 3060TI. Compute cores stayed the same between the 4070 and 3070.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
230 (0.30/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name Main
Processor 5700X
Motherboard MSI B450M Mortar
Cooling Corsair H80i v2
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3600MHz CL16
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3060 Ti VENTUS 2X OC 8GB GDDR6X
Display(s) LG 32GK850G
Case NOX HUMMER ZN
Power Supply Seasonic GX-750
If you read declared teraflops - yes with a lot. If you make comparison of FPS... will see when reviewed, but I also lose hope.
By that metric we're on 6800XT levels of performance.
I doubt it will happen on the fps charts but I'm very willing to be wrong.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.43/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Nvidia went down in compute cores on the 4060 and 4060TI compared to the 3060 and 3060TI. Compute cores stayed the same between the 4070 and 3070.
Yes, and those are fake names also. The 4060 is just a 4050 in fact, and the 4070 should be called a 4060TI. But It looks like the fake naming has backfired on both Nvidia and AMD.

By that metric we're on 6800XT levels of performance.
I doubt it will happen on the fps charts but I'm very willing to be wrong.
The TFlops are theoretically huge because former integer processing units can now do double purpose, hence double the floating point performance numbers. But in practice, the gain is somewhere between 15 to 25% at most, as seen on Ampere and on the 7900s.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 11, 2020
Messages
571 (0.36/day)
Location
Florida
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk x570
Cooling Thermalright
Memory 32 gb 3200mhz E die
Video Card(s) 3080
Storage 2tb nvme
Display(s) 165hz 1440p
Case Fractal Define R5
Power Supply Toughpower 850 platium
Mouse HyperX Hyperfire Pulse
Keyboard EVGA Z15
It's not a 6600XT replacement, it has the same number of CUs. CU's typically go up a bit of each generation, due to the die shrinks. 7600 is an honest name and it's the first honest name for AMD this generation. Let's hope it will also be a honest price.
I've lost all hope AMD will price this correctly. They are more than happy letting stock of 7000series build and empty 6000 stock. Itll be 300 until Oct I feel.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.43/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
I've lost all hope AMD will price this correctly. They are more than happy letting stock of 7000series build and empty 6000 stock. Itll be 300 until Oct I feel.
They still have time to price this right, but it's true that if you judge based on recent history there's not much reason for optimism. Still, AMD wants to sell these GPUs, they can't just allocate more capacity for the professional market as Nvidia does, so there's still a sliver of hope.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
I think after getting their first RX 7000 cards in their labs and running some first tests on them, AMD's engineers where probably asking themselves
"Is this what we where building for 2 years? Is there any real difference over RDNA2?"
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
1,073 (0.19/day)
Location
Porto
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro
Cooling AiO 240mm
Memory 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast 3600MHz CL18
Video Card(s) Radeon RX 6900XT Reference (amd.com)
Storage O.S.: 256GB SATA | 2x 1TB SanDisk SSD SATA Data | Games: 1TB Samsung 970 Evo
Display(s) LG 34" UWQHD
Audio Device(s) X-Fi XtremeMusic + Gigaworks SB750 7.1 THX
Power Supply XFX 850W
Mouse Logitech G502 Wireless
VR HMD Lenovo Explorer
Software Windows 10 64bit
So from those bandwidth numbers it looks like Navi 33 is using the same Infinity Cache arrangement as RDNA2 cards.

Navi 31 reduced the amount of L3 cache while doubling the bandwidth per cell, which is why they increased effective bandwidth contribution from the L3 despite lowering the cache from 128 to 96MB.

In the case of Navi 33, the only bandwidth increase seems to be from chancing GDDR6 14Gbps to 18Gbps. A difference of 4Gbps does 64GB/s at 128bit, which is the bandwidth difference between Navi 33 and Navi 23 according to that table.



200euro fine for the product, 300e not so much. At least for my view.
This card is dead in the water if AMD tries to charge anywhere near 300€. Even if they try to charge something like $280 people will just prefer to pay more for the 4060 as no reviewer or influencer is ever going to advise its purchase.

This needed to be 230€ to get major recommendations and it would set the world on fire at 200€. Which is probably where it will end up being priced at anyway, by the end of the year.
It all depends on whether AMD is willing to price it right or they're willing to risk massive pushbacks and disappointment from consumers.


The TFlops are theoretically huge because former integer processing units can now do double purpose, hence double the floating point performance numbers. But in practice, the gain is somewhere between 15 to 25% at most, as seen on Ampere and on the 7900s.

IIRC the 7900s have zero gain from the dual-pumped FP32 units because the compiler doesn't really support the functionality yet.
 
Top