Sorry, but the highest clocked Phenom for this year on the AMD roadmap is the 9950 2.6GHz 140W TDP. It should be released at the end of the year.
Anyway I wonder why are you so sure that AMD can magically release 3.2GHz+ quads over night?
After the release of the first 90nm SOI2 K8(Winchester) in 2004, AMD needed 3 years to release a 3.2GHz 90nm CPU(Windsor 6400+) in 2007.
AMD are producing 65nm CPUs for 1.5 years and so far we have seen only 2.6GHz K8. Why should we expect much higher frequencies from a CPU with 3 times more complex logic?
AMD needed half year to push the frequencies of Phenom from 2.3GHz to 2.5GHz. Why should we expect them to boost the frequency for more than 700MHz for 2 months? By the statistics and by the "law of diminishing results", the further frequency improvement will take more time and will result with lower clock bumps. Such dramatic clock bump(over 30%) for a relatively very short period of time has never happened in the whole semiconductor history. Why should we expect Phenom and 65nm IBM/AMD SOI3 to change that?
On the other hand, you can't forget the fact that Phenom at 2.4GHz is really really hot chip and is causing a lot of difficulties to many boards. Only high-end boards can run Phenom 9850. The power consumption/heat dissipation of a +3.2GHz Phenom will be at least 30% higher if the vCPU is the same as of 9850.
And there are tens(if not hundreds) more reasons why we should stop dreaming about uber-clocked Phenom. On the first AMD roadmaps for 2007, there was a 2.9GHz Phenom. AMD changed their roadmaps for reason and currently on their roadmap the highest clocked Phenom is 2.6GHz. Let's hope that it will OC better and that AMD will deliver it on time.
. Get your tickets and you will see the climax.
weird analogy but ok 
