jonmcc33
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 580 (0.10/day)
- Location
- Fort Myers, FL
System Name | BLACK |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 @ 3.2GHz |
Motherboard | Abit IP35-E @ 1600FSB |
Cooling | Thermalright XP-90 w/92mm ADDA fan |
Memory | 4GB Hynix DDR2-667 @ 800MHz |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Radeon X1900XT |
Storage | (2) 320GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 |
Display(s) | Samsung 225BW |
Case | Antec Nine Hundred |
Audio Device(s) | Audigy2 ZS Platinum |
Power Supply | Corsair HX520 |
Software | Windows Vista Business x64 SP1 |
No, its the fact that I have had 2 dead video cards, two dead motherboards, One bad NFTS file after ocing, to the fact I do CLEAN os's when I update hardware like Motherboards... So theres your Downloading. I could tell you where to put it. But, I'd rather be nice. No kidding to me. IF you feel the need to bash some more. Come to it.
Again, please calm down. I'm not bashing it. I just don't support using software like that. Now if I said that it was crap, that would be bashing it. Please understand the difference.
So when people update to new versions they never download it again? That's odd.
Do you know how many times I've downloaded Firefox from the website? I'm the only person in my house using it but it's had to be 100-200 times over the past few years.
There's a valid point though... which is... download counter should be based on EACH VERSION, since most people (like myself) who gave it a go... also downloaded the next point version etc. etc. to see if the tool got better etc. etc.
So while I wish LA a lot of luck in developing his great tool and promoting it... there have been at least 5 versions so far, so the relevant stats are downloads of the last version. That is a better representation of the number of unique people who are still interested in the tool.
PS. I like it. 8/10 to LA.
Ah, thanks for understanding what I'm trying to say and not trying to tear my head off about it.