techPowerUp! Forums

techPowerUp! Forums (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/index.php)
-   NVIDIA (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=59)
-   -   HyperSLI (Enabling SLI on non-sli motherboards) (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=153046)

oxy93n Nov 28, 2011 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z-FiRE (Post 2468890)
With ASUS P5Q mainboard or P45 chipset mainboard ?

look my pc specs ;)

i have asus crosshair iv formula with 890FX chip

the thing i did think why it works great with this board is that the 990fx from the crosshair V fomula have SLI enabled by default and the 890Fx is the same chip only without the sli certificate.

Z-FiRE Nov 28, 2011 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oxy93n (Post 2468902)
look my pc specs ;)

i have asus crosshair iv formula with 890FX chip

the thing i did think why it works great with this board is that the 990fx from the crosshair V fomula have SLI enabled by default and the 890Fx is the same chip only without the sli certificate.

So, it's not really the same specs of me and Hacko ;)

tinytiger Nov 28, 2011 02:46 PM

HperSLI 0.7 works well with 290.36

technogiant Nov 28, 2011 08:37 PM

I'm getting problems with 290.36....I initially tried it with the Hypersli 0.1 which has been working fine for me with previous drivers.
But with 290.36 when I enable sli through NV control panel I get a black screen followed by a black/white message "video mode not supported"

I updated to HyperSli 0.7 reinstalled 290.36 but have the same problem.
Went back to the latest non-beta driver with HyperSli 0.7 and works fine.....its just the latest 290.36 that is causing problems for me.
Intel Q6600 X38A chipset win7 home premium 64bit, 2X Palit gtx460's 2GB versions.

anatolymik Nov 29, 2011 02:05 AM

i haven't any problems with latest drivers. who else has problems?

anatolymik Nov 29, 2011 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2469324)
I'm getting problems with 290.36....I initially tried it with the Hypersli 0.1 which has been working fine for me with previous drivers.
But with 290.36 when I enable sli through NV control panel I get a black screen followed by a black/white message "video mode not supported"


Post screenshot or photo if you can.

by the way. try to set resolution to lowest and after that try to enable sli.

how many monitors you have plugged to cards?

technogiant Nov 29, 2011 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anatolymik (Post 2469597)

by the way. try to set resolution to lowest and after that try to enable sli.

how many monitors you have plugged to cards?

That worked a treat.....I only have the one monitor 1920X1200 60Hz, plugged into the card nearest the cpu...but I have the dvi connected to the second dvi port as that one appears to be a dual link where as the first one is a single link from what I can see.

Thanks Anatolymik...you're the man...:rockout:

Edit...actually rechecking that I think I'm mistaken...they are both dual link ports apparently.

federicoz45 Nov 29, 2011 09:45 PM

I confirm that driver 290.36 works fine with 3 way SLI. No significant improvements adviced.

About Skyrim:

This driver enables Ambient Occlusion for Skyrim, but it seems to degrade the quality in depth when inside rooms. Disabled solves the issue.

ThePOO Nov 29, 2011 10:15 PM

I finally got around to putting my system specs on my account today, and reflecting them here just because ...

AMD Phenom II 1090T
MSI 890FXA-GD70
Scythe Orochi Rev B
4 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 (16GB)
2 MSI GTX580 Frozr II/OC (Asus SLI Adapter)
4 Crucial RealSSD C300 in Raid-0 (1TB)
2 Seagate ST2000DL003 6Gbps in Raid-0 (4TB)
Lite-On IHAS22406
3 HannStar Hanns.G iF281 28" (2D Surround - 3600x1920)
Cooler Master HAF 932
Cooler Master Silent Pro M 1000W
Window 7 Pro SP1

HyperSLI 0.7 beta

290.36 beta


... because? Because I'm so happy that's why.

Because of the efforts of anatolymik and progressive improvement in the nVidia drivers I can finally play my Battlefield 3 Limited Edition for the first time TODAY! :toast:

timohour Dec 1, 2011 11:16 AM

First of all anatolymik thanks a lot for the awesome tools and work.
I am recently trying to enable sli on a motherboard that comes only with two pci-e x1.
Since you are the only guy who know well of Nvidia drivers I would like your help to find out a way to enable this. Is it possible with older drivers?
Just point me on the right direction.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Waiting for your answer.

oxy93n Dec 1, 2011 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timohour (Post 2471991)
First of all anatolymik thanks a lot for the awesome tools and work.
I am recently trying to enable sli on a motherboard that comes only with two pci-e x1.
Since you are the only guy who know well of Nvidia drivers I would like your help to find out a way to enable this. Is it possible with older drivers?
Just point me on the right direction.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Waiting for your answer.

2x x1 pcie? sorry but why u will spend money in sli with this setup? u will never get any performance boost with pcie-x1 sli.

phoen Dec 1, 2011 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oxy93n (Post 2472184)
2x x1 pcie? sorry but why u will spend money in sli with this setup? u will never get any performance boost with pcie-x1 sli.

Same with only one graphics card xD

timohour Dec 1, 2011 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oxy93n (Post 2472184)
2x x1 pcie? sorry but why u will spend money in sli with this setup? u will never get any performance boost with pcie-x1 sli.

Actually it is a laptop hooking up two eGPUs.
When I first read this forum I was thinking the same thing. But when I hooked up my 460 and gave me 11000 GPU Vantage points I changed my mind. Right now I have another 460 up and running but it won't do any good until I find a way to enable sli.

any advice will be welcome.

Thanks i advance oxy93n

Quote:

Originally Posted by phoen (Post 2472217)
Same with only one graphics card xD

Why is that? I mean there aren't particular tests that show that. GPUs are doing their job on their own and only when it comes to export data they communicate through the sli bridge.
Theoritically the performance limitation is due to the reduced lanes x1 vs x16 that they use. Ain't that right?

Thanks in advance phoen

oxy93n Dec 1, 2011 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timohour (Post 2472219)



Why is that? I mean there aren't particular tests that show that. GPUs are doing their job on their own and only when it comes to export data they communicate through the sli bridge.
Theoritically the performance limitation is due to the reduced lanes x1 vs x16 that they use. Ain't that right?

Thanks in advance phoen

thats not right
sli works without bridge with older drivers so ther is a comunication betwen the pci-e slots. the only thing why a bridge is used to relieve the pci-e slots.

sorry my english is bad i hope u know what i mean.

technogiant Dec 1, 2011 04:43 PM

The game engine running on the cpu needs to deliver all the graphics requests via the pcie connection, also as mentioned above data transfer occurs between the two cards on both the pcie bus and the sli bridge.

Many comparisons have been done on the effect of pcie bandwith on sli/crosffire setups, generally there is little difference going from an X16 by X16 to an X8 by X8 but on older mobos with X16 by X4 there was a large reducing in multi gpu efficiency.....X1 by X1 as you are suggesting would be point less. Infact is there any point in putting any graphics card in an x1 pcie slot?

timohour Dec 1, 2011 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2472303)
Many comparisons have been done on the effect of pcie bandwith on sli/crosffire setups, generally there is little difference going from an X16 by X16 to an X8 by X8 but on older mobos with X16 by X4 there was a large reducing in multi gpu efficiency.....X1 by X1 as you are suggesting would be point less.

In fact that is because the x4 port was running @ 1.0 speeds, meaning that you are actually running x2 2.0 speeds (1GB/s). This is happening even on P55 boards. The differencies can be seen here where I have made a test for all speeds X16, x4, x2, x1 with a i7 and a 5850 extreme.


Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2472303)
Infact is there any point in putting any graphics card in an x1 pcie slot?

This is the only way to have a cheap gaming laptop. I thought the original thought for this patch was to save money. That's what I 'm trying to do right now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by oxy93n (Post 2472302)
thats not right
sli works without bridge with older drivers so ther is a comunication betwen the pci-e slots. the only thing why a bridge is used to relieve the pci-e slots.

sorry my english is bad i hope u know what i mean.

I understand what you mean, but since I have the cards I am thinking to test it for myself.
Thanks


That was the only place I thought I would find help, but instead I get advice why not to do it.
Thanks.

technogiant Dec 1, 2011 05:28 PM

That's all interesting stuff, I'm not sure how the benchmark you have been using actually works though. By that I mean is the benchmark essentially running internally on the gpu structure and as such relatively independent of the bus bandwidth?
I don't know if this is the case but if it were then the results would be flawed.
Personally I think I would run real world game benchmarks before throwing much money at such a system.

timohour Dec 1, 2011 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2472356)
That's all interesting stuff, I'm not sure how the benchmark you have been using actually works though. By that I mean is the benchmark essentially running internally on the gpu structure and as such relatively independent of the bus bandwidth?
I don't know if this is the case but if it were then the results would be flawed.
Personally I think I would run real world game benchmarks before throwing much money at such a system.

Since the GPU is connected to an external monitor there is no need for too much bandwidth. Of course actual benchmarks (RE5, Devil May Cry) show bigger differencies, but most times you get 60-80% of the performance the gpu would gave on a x16 2.0 port (with a decent CPU offcourse).

Connecting two cards since they are using two different pci-e ports will widen the bandwidth and according to my calculations it would be around 120-150% of a single card @ x16 2.0.
I would be able to check right now (since I have everything) if it wasn't for the fact that sli won't show on nvidia Control Panel, maybe because I am running @ x1-x1. Thats what I am trying to overcome. If I will be able, we can discuss the results later.

technogiant Dec 1, 2011 09:34 PM

Sounds an interesting project, my guess is though that as your pcie bandwidth is already limiting your cards performance that when you use sli you will further reduce the performance of each gpu.
I say that because although you are doubling your bandwidth, that bandwidth is being shared between 2 gpu's so is essentially similar to your one card set up. When you subtract the overhead on the bandwidth that sli will impose you will have less bandwdth per gpu than you originally had, and as that was already the limiting factor you will see a decrease in your per gpu performance.
When you factor in that sli will only give 70% - 80% increase with the second card in a full bandwidth system then its debatable on how much more you will get....dependant on how much of a negative effect the sli overhead has on your bandwidth.

Still its always good to see your projects through.....you always find someone with a negative view point on the web ;-)....so good luck with that. If anyone could help you get that up and running I'm sure people here could.

timohour Dec 1, 2011 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2472602)
You always find someone with a negative view point on the web ;-)....so good luck with that. If anyone could help you get that up and running I'm sure people here could.

Thanks for your help man! They say that: There are no bad ideas, just different perspectives.

That's what I hope...

:respect: pls somebody help me

technogiant Dec 2, 2011 07:52 AM

So Timohour I take it you've installed the HyperSli patch but still aren't getting any option to enable sli in the NV control panel?

You also have to enable virtualisation on the cpu through the bios....the correct term evades me if someone else can help out here?

If your still not getting the option and its down to the driver not allowing it because you are using X1 lanes as you suspected then other more knowlegable people will have to help you.

timohour Dec 2, 2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2473005)
So Timohour I take it you've installed the HyperSli patch but still aren't getting any option to enable sli in the NV control panel?

You also have to enable virtualisation on the cpu through the bios....the correct term evades me if someone else can help out here?

If your still not getting the option and its down to the driver not allowing it because you are using X1 lanes as you suspected then other more knowlegable people will have to help you.

Yeap, exactly...
I followed everything, enabled virtualization, install hypersli, hypersli reported working but Nvidia Control Panel didn't include SLl configuration.

So I figured it is a driver configuration, as faced by previous p67 users where anatoly told them that they have to enable a x16-x4 configuration instead of the x16-x1 they had. That gave me the tip that hypersli may was working but the driver needed more manipulation.

technogiant Dec 2, 2011 04:07 PM

The only other thing I can suggest is you should try it using the sli 1.5 beta patch rather than the hypersli....don't know if that works differently...but worth a try....other than that...I'm spent...and your looking at much more complex solutions......keep trying dude...lol

SuperTuck Dec 2, 2011 04:18 PM

I am having a similar problem as technogiant. The last drivers work great for me but the new beta ones do not. Whenever I enable SLI it makes the two beeps for a disconnected video source and a reconnected source and the desktop never comes back. It stays blanks and then after about 15 seconds it says no video source. Once it gave me a blue screen with a b3 code. I've tried clean reinstalls of the hypersli and the beta drivers and multiple reboots. I did get it to go SLI once, but when I tried to enable 3d vision it crashed out teh same way as it does when I normally try SLI.

I have two GTX 580s on an m4a89td pro/usb. I'm ignorant technically but if you need more info you can probably walk me through teh steps.

Edit: I just noticed the reduce resolution fix. I am going to try that. So just drop resolution low until SLI is working then up it? Giving that a shot.

Second Edit: I tried to drop my resolution and it worked. I was able to get SLI working, then I enabled 3d vision. However, when I changed the resolution back to native at 1080p the screen went blank again and reported lost signal. I had to hard reset and when it came back Windows said I wasn't connected to an Nvidia graphics device so I couldn't open the nvidia panel.

I really want that ambient occlusion from the new patch for SKyrim but I would rather keep my sli and 3d vision for it. Any suggestions? I am only using one monitor at 1080p.

technogiant Dec 2, 2011 05:39 PM

Supertruck....I changed the resolution via the window 7 interface rather than the NV control panel.....don't know if that makes a difference. Just dropped it as low as possible, enabled sli and then increased the resolution again via the win 7 interface rather than NV control panel.

SuperTuck Dec 2, 2011 06:13 PM

that's what I tried. I'm going to try it again though later this afternoon. I think it may have been another problem - my 580's develop a "ghost in the machine" a graphical rendering problem that arises out of nowhere sometimes that causes artifacts and crashes. I see it only in game, and I hadn't been able to launch a game until I reverted back to my old drivers which revealed the problem. The fix is to unplug all power from teh system for 20 seconds or so to let whatever the problem is clear. That might have been it. I will repost later when I am back at my home PC to say if it worked or not.

oxy93n Dec 2, 2011 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperTuck (Post 2473534)
that's what I tried. I'm going to try it again though later this afternoon. I think it may have been another problem - my 580's develop a "ghost in the machine" a graphical rendering problem that arises out of nowhere sometimes that causes artifacts and crashes. I see it only in game, and I hadn't been able to launch a game until I reverted back to my old drivers which revealed the problem. The fix is to unplug all power from teh system for 20 seconds or so to let whatever the problem is clear. That might have been it. I will repost later when I am back at my home PC to say if it worked or not.


what system u have and what powersupply u use?

SuperTuck Dec 2, 2011 07:50 PM

That was the problem, sorry to clutter the thread. I don't recall what brand the powersupply is but I think it is 1000w or 1050w.

chuckykilo Dec 2, 2011 08:08 PM

hey i installed the hyper sli patch, booted in hypersli but i dont have any sli option in my nvda controll panel running asus maximus formula with two 7950 gx 2
how do i get sli in the nvda controll panell ?

chuckykilo Dec 3, 2011 11:37 PM

any hel here would be nice i can boot from hypersli np cant activate virtualization tho, no sli option in nvda controll panell using nvda 285.62 drivers my two 7950gx2 have a bridge on them yech gpu says sli disabled ?
how do i get SLI on ?

thanks ahead
running asus maximus formula board

technogiant Dec 4, 2011 07:16 AM

If you can't activate virtualization then you can't use the Hypersli patch, you will have to use the older SLI 1.5 beta patch...

What processor do you have Intel or Amd....why can't you activate virtualization?
I know that that hypersli wasn't working on AMD but Anatolymic was working on a fix...not sure if that is done yet.

oxy93n Dec 4, 2011 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by technogiant (Post 2475049)
I know that that hypersli wasn't working on AMD but Anatolymic was working on a fix...not sure if that is done yet.

i have AMD Board with AMD CPU and it works great u can see my pc at specs left

timohour Dec 4, 2011 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by federicoz45 (Post 2456946)
I confirm that the 3way SLI with GTX 570 is finally working and solved.
It wasn't a Hypersli or driver related issue, but just a stupid monitor connection.
If the monitor is connected to the main pci-e card (closest to the cpu) the driver hangs.
Moved the cable DVI to the lowest card (the latest installed..) it simply activate.

A big thank you to Anatolymik that helps me with several efforts.

Woo Hoo 3way SLI rocks!

Anatolymik asked confition from Federicoz and he confirmed working sli on amd platform with hypersli 0.7.

@Chuckykilo

If you can't enable vt you have to use modded drivers since hypersli works on legacy mode. (Slipatch works instead).

davidm71 Dec 4, 2011 03:07 PM

Work on Crosshair IV??
 
Anyone know will this work on a Crosshair IV? Read some people said because 890 chipset is similar to 990FX chipset its possible...

Thanks.

timohour Dec 4, 2011 03:19 PM

@davidm71

Quote:

Originally Posted by oxy93n (Post 2475073)
i have AMD Board with AMD CPU and it works great u can see my pc at specs left

Oxy93n has a crosshair IV and it works great

PLS! Read at least the posts of the last page!

oxy93n Dec 4, 2011 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidm71 (Post 2475218)
Anyone know will this work on a Crosshair IV? Read some people said because 890 chipset is similar to 990FX chipset its possible...

Thanks.

i wrote it some sites before. The 990Fx is only a rebrandet 890Fx

the only thing is that asus and 2 or 3 other vendors have now licenced SLI for this 990Fx chip and not for the 890Fx.

and thats why i think that HYPERSLI 0.7 works so great for me. when SLI work on licenced 990Fx it must work on 890Fx also.^^

kramspark Dec 4, 2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidm71 (Post 2475218)
Anyone know will this work on a Crosshair IV? Read some people said because 890 chipset is similar to 990FX chipset its possible...

Thanks.

yup i have the 1100t and crosshair 4 also and i have hypersli working on 2 460's

i forgot to tell oxy i got everything back up and running i installed beta drivers 285.79 and hypersli put all my ocing back on @ 3.9 ran the mem up to 1533 all is perfect and very stable

i can run bf3 now with no crashes

chuckykilo Dec 5, 2011 01:26 AM

Thanks guys but still no Sli :cry:
I installed Sli patch 1.5 b then installed 285.38 nvda drivers then ran the install.cmd command from the moddified drivers rebooted
booted in sli mode still no sli in nvda controll pannel
running x38 asus maximus board windows 7 32bit 2 nvda 7950 gx2 with bridge
really apreciated any help ??

oxy93n Dec 5, 2011 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckykilo (Post 2475681)
Thanks guys but still no Sli :cry:
I installed Sli patch 1.5 b then installed 285.38 nvda drivers then ran the install.cmd command from the moddified drivers rebooted
booted in sli mode still no sli in nvda controll pannel
running x38 asus maximus board windows 7 32bit 2 nvda 7950 gx2 with bridge
really apreciated any help ??

maybe the 2 x2 crads can the problem. 1 gx2 have to run in sli and 2 is quadsli now. maybe it wont work with slipatch.

chuckykilo Dec 5, 2011 09:02 PM

I still dont have the SLI option in controll pannel but i can enable multiple gpu and see that NVIDIA SLI is enabled in GPU-Z
But it only enables x2 SLI which means that it runs two cards in synce per slot not Quad SLI but i have two cards in each slot so i want to run quad SLI 4GPU running together instead of 2 and 2 seprate
I alos dont have Phys or Cuda in the nvda pannel

does anyone know if i installed the stringinstall zip or the LHALmod zip would that help and give me the SLI certificate that i am missing ???

davidm71 Dec 6, 2011 07:29 PM

Not going to happen!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kramspark (Post 2475523)
yup i have the 1100t and crosshair 4 also and i have hypersli working on 2 460's

My Crosshair IV Formula will not post with two 285GTXs. As soon as the second GTX285 has its 6pin power removed or the card removed the system posts. The board has leds to tell where its stalling during the posting and the VGA led was the last one to light up. Kind of shame. The board is racist towards nvidia multigpu setups. I was so much looking forward to getting sli going on an AMD board but not going to happen!

Thanks.

davidm71 Dec 6, 2011 08:25 PM

Definetely not like nVidia cards..
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by davidm71 (Post 2477314)
My Crosshair IV Formula will not post with two 285GTXs. As soon as the second GTX285 has its 6pin power removed or the card removed the system posts. The board has leds to tell where its stalling during the posting and the VGA led was the last one to light up. Kind of shame. The board is racist towards nvidia multigpu setups. I was so much looking forward to getting sli going on an AMD board but not going to happen!

Thanks.

Sorry I'm bumping my own thread but I just wanted to report that I tried another nvidia based card in that slot and it wouldn't post. So then I tried an ATI based card and it posted!

So I guess I won't be able to try this mod out after all :(

cpo32 Dec 6, 2011 08:38 PM

1 Attachment(s)
hi guys

(sorry if thats maybe the wrong thread, but i think lots of you have much expirience with hyper sli or slipatch..)

1. what is that for a stripe on left? :confused:
2. how can get rid of it?

and whats the differenze between HyperSli and Slipatch?

thx :toast:

federicoz45 Dec 7, 2011 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpo32 (Post 2477390)
hi guys

(sorry if thats maybe the wrong thread, but i think lots of you have much expirience with hyper sli or slipatch..)

1. what is that for a stripe on left? :confused:
2. how can get rid of it?

and whats the differenze between HyperSli and Slipatch?

thx :toast:

Go to Nvidia control panel, the bar on top has 3d settings tag, open it and uncheck show SLI indicator. The bar shows the amount of the data share between cards, useful to understand if cpu limit or gpu limit.
Sli patch was used with older drivers together with mod patch. Now Hypersli works with virtualization technology, if available on the mainboard, and don't need mod patch to the official drivers.

cpo32 Dec 7, 2011 12:36 AM

aaaah all clear fatt THX

lol that is e NV option haha. ok now with hyperSLI there are also these strobo flashes in BF3 & 3DMark 3 away....

so all works nice!

oxy93n Dec 7, 2011 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidm71 (Post 2477314)
My Crosshair IV Formula will not post with two 285GTXs. As soon as the second GTX285 has its 6pin power removed or the card removed the system posts. The board has leds to tell where its stalling during the posting and the VGA led was the last one to light up. Kind of shame. The board is racist towards nvidia multigpu setups. I was so much looking forward to getting sli going on an AMD board but not going to happen!

Thanks.


there are 2 users including me who have no problems with the croshair IV. and since the 990fx is only an rebranded (and sli licenced) 890fx, sli have to work perfect on this board.

so what slots you use? what powersuply you have? and have you install an sli bridge cable?

federicoz45 Dec 7, 2011 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidm71 (Post 2477314)
My Crosshair IV Formula will not post with two 285GTXs. As soon as the second GTX285 has its 6pin power removed or the card removed the system posts. The board has leds to tell where its stalling during the posting and the VGA led was the last one to light up. Kind of shame. The board is racist towards nvidia multigpu setups. I was so much looking forward to getting sli going on an AMD board but not going to happen!

Thanks.

Oxy93n is right, you're doing something wrong and we need more info on your setup if you
need help.
I have the CH 4 too with 3 gtx 570 and works really good.
Post info.

cmd512 Dec 8, 2011 01:37 AM

Just signed up to say a big thank you to anatolymik... HyperSLI working perfectly on my Asus P5Q Pro Turbo. In 3DMark Vantage default mode (Performance), score went from 12500 to 27000!

Talk about breathing life into an aging system, thanks again! :)

Rhole Dec 8, 2011 11:09 AM

Hey, thanks for all the effort with HyperSli! :)

Im having one or two issues, but I believe it might be simple to solve when I can norrow it down...

----

I have an Asus p5k (vanilla) with Vdroop mod and a core 2 quad q6600 @ 3.4GHz. It's a P35 chipset with 2 PCIe slots @ 16x and 4x.

I have 2 GTX 280's both at stock voltages and clocks.

I have a Hiper Type R Mk II 880W Power Supply.

I do not yet have an SLi bridge at the moment. But I have ordered one on ebay, and it should arrive either later today or tomorrow.

----

Some games work, and some do not. I realise performance will be slightly lower due to not having the bridge yet, but I thought I would get my system setup and ready for the bridge when it arrives.

Call of Duty Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3 both work fine. MSI Afterburner shows GPU Usage on both cards, so SLi is definately active.

When I try to load Battlefield 3 or the Unigine Heaven benchmark, it will either crash on load with a black screen, or show desktop flickering on the bottom half of both of my monitors, and then crash. It never loads either, the crash happens just as you would expect it to show anything on screen.

Since I can see SLi working in COD, should I assume it's a bug, driver, card, or other issue?

I've tried both the latest 290.36 and the 285 drivers. Same issue on both. I am using HyperSLi 0.7.

Any help would be apprechiated! :cool:

oxy93n Dec 8, 2011 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhole;2479026

I [U
do not[/U] yet have an SLi bridge at the moment. But I have ordered one on ebay, and it should arrive either later today or tomorrow.

i wonder how u can activate SLI without sli bridge. i thinked with latest driver sli only works with bridge. only older drivers accept without.

did i missed something or im totally wrong ^^


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.