NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan PCB Pictured...Sort Of
 

Here's the first blurry picture of the GeForce GTX Titan PCB. Among the structures we can make out on the surprisingly not to busy metropolis is the ASIC itself, which uses an integrated heatspreader much like every other high-end NVIDIA GPU. The card draws power from a combination of 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe power connectors. It is then conditioned to the various power domains by what appears to be an 8+2+2 phase VRM.

One can easily make out 12 memory chips, but that's just on the side that we see. We know for a fact that there are no 4 Gbit GDDR5 memory chips that graphics card makers can buy (at least not at a viable price), and so this card should most definitely use 12 chips on the reverse side.

http://www.techpowerup.com/img/13-02-07/45a_thm.jpg

Source: WCCFTech

Why are the first pictures always blurry?

They're so that you can't tell they're mock-ups.

Look at that wood screw

Where are its steroids and syringes? I was expecting to see some.

Some stuff got on the lens. Sorry about that. I'll remember the Kleenex next time.

to be honest... looks fake.

Like that 3d11 score it probable is.

little bit unblurry image :

http://videocardz.com/images/2013/02...CB-Picture.jpg

The point to watch :
- 8 Pin power & 6 Pin power same as GTX 480 and 580 placement, but no hole with the PCB
- Placement of RAM tottally different than GTX 280,GTX 480, GTX 580 and GTX 680 as far as I know
- The yellow components, what is that?look like MSI lightning components

a yoctometer size grain of salt :toast:

Careful man you'll damage the lens further

Wow, judging on this blurred mess it could as well be a Voodoo 3 card with a NVIDIA GPU sticked to it in MS Paint...

The thing that stands out to me is 1-6 pin and 1-8 pin...looks like a naked 4gb 680 ftw edition...

do I see 12 mem chips on one side? probably 512 x12?

here is another alleged benchmark.. ;)

http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/news/...dmark_gpuz.jpg
GPU-Z seems to know something we dont! :p


this time from ArabPCWorld

I love it when WCCFTech whore attention, even though 75% of their assumptions are completely wrong.

Memory arrangement reminds me of the 200 series.

I would imagine that PCI-E @ 8x v1.1 would gimp it more than it is there.

I had the FTW 4gb GTX680 and I can say that this PCB is not the FTW.

FTW has stacked connectors .
The VRMs on the FTW was sort of diagonal and not lined straight as they are in the shot.

TITAN or TAIWAN ??? :)

I would have to agree.. Definitely looks a lot more like TAIWAN.

awwwwwww
 

it looks soooo TAIWWWAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNN:banghead:

Doesn't your board reduce bandwidth automatically when not in full use? I know mine reduces my main 7970 to x8 2.0 when idling and the secondary card to x8 1.1 when idling. Put a load on them and as soon as the clock speeds go to 3d clocks, both pop up to x16 3.0. It could just be an x79 or AMD thing, but the bandwidth load test in GPUz must be there for a reason...

To me it looks fake, the same way as those results.

The vbios version should be 80.xx.xx.xx.xx and not 90. :rolleyes: Another fake.

couldn't find a copy of Photoshop, so they used MS Paint

AWWWWWWWW SKEET SKEET!

Love blurry nerd porn. Its like we are trying to see Lindsay Lohan monkey through a shower curtain.