![]() |
Geekbench
Geekbench is a nifty benchmarking utility, focusing on math crunch and memory speeds. It is a CPU benchmark, not GPU. OK! Let's see your scores.
Instructions
Quote:
================================================== ============================ ========== WANTED ================================================== =========== Would someone kindly run the following: Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper! Nehalem-EP Xeon E5400 systems Xeon E5500 systems Xeon E7 systems A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2. Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish! Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer Atom D2600/D2800 Via Nano or C7 AMD C-350 and C-450 APUs Favourite "multicore" benchmarks, Fritz, Geekbench, EVEREST PhotoWorxx |
http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/geekbenchalexp999.png
alexp999 | Q6600 | 3.6 GHz | DDR2 1000 | 6262 | 8271 | 6987 | 2926 | 3369 | Not optimized |
When I run it, it says it's not a valid Win32 application. :ohwell:
|
Quote:
|
I ran it fine on Win 7 x64
|
|
Atom330:
lemonadesoda | Atom 330 | 1.6 Ghz | DDR2 400 | 1211 | 1403 | 1225 | 961 | 995 | 757 | Shuttle X27D |
did a 3.6ghz run with HT Turned off for a clock vs clock comparison with the q6600 for curiosity.
PSYCHoHoLiC | i7 920 | 3.6 Ghz | DDR3 1098 | http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/23322.jpg |
http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/Capture003651.jpg
Xternal | E7200 | 3.16 Ghz | DDR 800 | 3487 | 4549| 3790 | 1981 | 1730 | 1103 | Meh...Winxp |
Could not load screen shot atm...:shadedshu
A Cheese Danish | AMD Opteron 170 | 2.95 GHz | 4GB DDR400 | 3091 | 3251 | 4147 | 1677 | 1665 | 1048 | Windows XP x64 running the x86 version of geekbench |
http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/geekbench1.jpg
BiNGE Molly i7 | i7 920 | 4.2GHz | DDR3 1600 | 11113 | 12182 | 13919 | 6305 | 7169 | 2646 | Vista 64 |
http://img.techpowerup.org/090319/bench.jpg
Slyfox2151 | E7300 | 3.333mhz | DDR2 800mhz | 3686 | 4772 | 3975 | 2136 | 1978 | 1116 | Vista / anti viri running |
On ASUS DSEB:
lemonadesoda | L5420 x2 | 3.0 Ghz | FB-DIMM 800 | 8511 | 12286 | 10566 | 1775 | 1586 | 2837 | Single channel FB.DIMM at the moment |
DOM | X3350 | 4GHz | DDR2 1066 | 7061 | 9523 | 7869 | 3171 | 3404 | 1765.25 | Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1
|
Why does Solaris get his own version?
http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/Capture043.jpg |
I guess someone just hasnt compiled the build yet. Not a lot of call for it, possibly?
**** On another note, this benchmark is bringing my L/E5420 system to BSOD. I think it may be the northbridge/memory system. I can bench from cold boot up. But a warm machine BSODs. No problem with other benchmarks. Something I need to look into... Dan, kindly do an OC L5310 system. |
On ASUS P4P800-VM:
lemonadesoda | P4EE | 3.2 Ghz | DDR 400 | 1489 | 1595 | 1556 | 1290 | 1285 | 465 | Done over RDP, quite a lot of overhead http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/119814 I find it amazing that an Atom 330 can keep up with a P4EE 3.2Ghz. While the P4EE will game better (faster performance for the single core), for productivity software that can multithread, the Atom 330 is a perfect, cheap, silent replacement for such machines. Quite simply, if you have ANY P4 machines in your office, they should be immediately retired. Their power consumption/performance ratios as well as noise means they should hit the scrap heap. A $100 Intel Atom 330 board and a $20 stick of DDR2 will outperform it. The only point against this upgrade is the loss of AGP video cards and using onboard video... which we can do due to double TFT setups. :-( |
http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/Capture044.jpg
Evil laptop. You have L5420's, nice, been wanting those due to the x7 multiplier. Though actually buying them for the slight increase would be a waste. |
I've mixed a L5420 and E5420. Same 45nm and same stepping. I would have preferred 2xL5420 for power reasons... but I took what I could get at a great price. The E5420 has active cooling. The L5420 has passive, but gets "hit" with a little airflow from the E5420 fan.
BSEL mod. FSB 1600. I'm having stability troubles at the moment. I think it is the Northbridge/FB-DIMM. I hope this and not a issue with mixing CPUs. Stable when cold. Unstable when warm... therefore I suspect Northbrdge/FB-DIMM. |
I have two HR-01 X's on my CPU's, single 120mm fan on them. BSEL to 1600 as well, can overclock further but have been lazy. I sShould raise voltage by a lot and see how far they go. Memory shouldn't be a real issue, two of my modules are 667Mhz forcing my memory to 667. I know they can do 780 at least. (they did on my X7) And my other two modules are 800 stock so should do 780 as well, even with the lower timings.
|
I have those too. But the Thermalright HR-01 X are a complete pain. Had I realised how their fixing mechanism for s771 worked, then I would have bought the Noctuas. The HR-01 X's are a disaster for mounting/unmounting due to the location of their bolting mechanism on s771. It takes forever and twisted fingers and a risk of slipped screwdrivers or spanners to install and remove. When you see how easy an Intel stock cooler or the Noctuas are to install... they are worth $20 more just for the time they save.
The Thermalright HR-01 is OK on s775 however. But absolutely cannot recommend them for s771 though! |
I completely agree, they are a hell to install/remove. I actually made that comment on XS a few days ago. Though in the end it's performance that matters, it's not like I should be removing them every other day.
Also, they'd fit better on certain boards, being able to rotate them 90 degrees makes them nice. It's a shame few boards will allow that. |
that bench told me im pretty much a noob, BAH at it
|
At 2.40 GHz: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench...922&key=589338
btarunr | X4 9750 | 2.40 GHz | Ganged DDR2-1066 | 4372 | 4795 | 5536 | 2902 | 1765 | 1821.66 | Linux x64 I disabled Cool'n'Quiet and C1E from the BIOS. When enabled, Linux keeps playing with the CPU speeds on a per-core basis. It is likely that Core 0 clock speed was 1.20 GHz in my previous run, which is why the result looked funny. Count this: http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/bta512.png |
That's more like it! I was thinking the Phenom had passed out.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.