techPowerUp! Forums

techPowerUp! Forums (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Hardware (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Geekbench (http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88575)

lemonadesoda Mar 18, 2009 10:26 PM

Geekbench
 
Geekbench is a nifty benchmarking utility, focusing on math crunch and memory speeds. It is a CPU benchmark, not GPU. OK! Let's see your scores.

Instructions
  1. Download Geekbench 2.1.x http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...ch_v2.1.4.html *Note 1
  2. Install and run the 32-bit test
  3. You can either 1) Use the "submit" button in geekbench, and then copy the hyperlink of the results to this thread (preferred), or alternatively post the screenshot of Summary and System information using TPUCapture!
  4. Post the <table> data as shown below, and remember to calculate the value in the last column GeekScore / Ghz, example = 4555 / 2.70 = 1687
Quote:


Name | CPU | Speed | MemoryType | GeekbenchScore | Integer | FP | Memory | StreamScore | GeekScore/Ghz | comments and/or link to geekbench URL result
lemonadesoda | Q6600 | 2.70 Ghz | DDR 400 | 4550 | 6321 | 5335 | 1680 | 1349 | calculate it! |

*Note 1. Geekbench is updated from time to time. I have found v2.1.x to identify my dual xeon system correctly as 2 processors, 8 cores total. But using the lastest GeekBench 2.4.x gives the WRONG CPU info, it says, 1 processor 8 cores, and also gives quite different results. So please download GeekBench v2.1.x from the link above.

Name CPU (2x for dual) Speed MemoryType GeekScore Integer FP Memory StreamScore GeekScore/Ghz comment
lemonadesoda Q6600 2.7 Ghz DDR 400 4555 6348 5326 1670 1352 1687 AGP system, W2K3. ASROCK 775i65 v2.0
lemonadesoda Atom 280 1.66 Ghz DDR2 911 932 778 1023 1085 549 Sony VAIO W
lemonadesoda Atom 330 1.60 Ghz DDR2 667 1211 1403 1225 961 995 757 Shuttle X27D
lemonadesoda Atom D525 1.80 Ghz DDR2 800 1444 1601 1392 1283 1401 802 Supermicro X7SPA-HF result
lemonadesoda P4EE 3.2 Ghz DDR 400 1489 1595 1556 1290 1285 465 Done over RDP, quite a lot of overhead
lemonadesoda 2x L5420 3.00 Ghz FB-DIMM 800 8511 12286 10566 1775 1586 2837 Single channel FB.DIMM
lemonadesoda 2x E5420 2.50 Ghz FB-DIMM 667 7162 10313 8823 1570 1512 2865 DUAL Channel FB-DIMM
lemonadesoda 2x E5420 2.50 Ghz FB-DIMM 667 7346 10439 8843 1996 1989 2938 QUAD Channel FB-DIMM
lemonadesoda 2x E5472 3.00 GHz FB-DIMM 800 8712 12426 10540 2097 2549 2904 Workstation
lemonadesoda i5-3210M 2.50 GHz DDR3 800 4960 4835 5612 4172 4693 1984 AsRock Vision HT 321B
alexp999 Q6600 3.6 GHz DDR2 1000 6262 8271 6987 2926 3369 1739 W7
PSYCHoHoLiC i7 920 4.0 GHz DDR3 10365 11504 13079 5964 5687 2591 Vista
PSYCHoHoLiC i7 920 3.6 Ghz DDR3 1098 7463 ....2073 
Xternal E7200 3.16 Ghz DDR 800 3487 4549 3790 1981 1730 1103 Meh...Winxp
A Cheese Danish AMD Opteron 170 2.95 GHz 4GB DDR400 3091 3251 4147 1677 1665 1048 Windows XP x64 running the x86 version of geekbench
BiNGE Molly i7 i7 920 4.2 GHz DDR3 1600 11113 12182 13919 6305 7169 2646 Vista 64
Slyfox2151 E7300 3.33 Ghz DDR2 800mhz 3686 4772 3975 2136 1978 1116 Vista / anti viri running
DOM X3350 4GHz DDR2 1066 7061 9523 7869 3171 3404 1765 Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1
btarunr X4 9750 2.40 GHz Ganged DDR2-1066 4372 4795 5536 2902 1765 1822 Linux x64
Pete1burn 2x FX-70 2.6GHz 4gb DDR2 800 4247 4648 5993 1733 1765 1633 
HammerON E8500 3.16 GHz DDR2 1066 4607 5882 4905 2916 2489 1458 Vista 32bit
DanTheBanjoman 2x L5310 2.4 GHz FB-DIMM-667 7039 9902 8509 1890 2173 2933 Should fix my memory
DrPepper Q6600 3.8 Ghz DDR2-1138 6767 8985 7549 3126 3557 1760 Cake
DrPepper Q6600 2.4 Ghz DDR2-800 4236 5560 4666 2063 2448 1765 Stock FSB 266
DrPepper Q6600 2.7 Ghz DDR2-800 4732 6263 5247 2329 2378 1752 FSB 300
A Cheese Danish T9300 2.5 GHz DDR2 667 2767 3572 2949 1644 1564 1107 Windows 7 Ultimate
A Cheese Danish Atom 270 1.6GHz DDR2 533 873 894 736 986 1063 546 Windows XP x86 SP3
3870x2 T2600 2.16 GHZ DDR 667 2259 2700 2522 1375 1572 1046 My Work Laptop
mlee49 Q9450 3.21 Ghz DDR2 1066 5762 7501 6226 3115 3346 1795 Vista x64
angelkiller E8400 4.3GHz DDR2-956 4815 6120 5102 3405 2793 1119 no comment
angelkiller E2180 3.0 GHz DDR2-600 3329 4240 3566 1986 1999 1110  
angelkiller T2500 2 GHz DDR2-667 2001 1380 3042 1553 1428 1000 Lenovo T60. Core Duo, not Core 2, 1GB of RAM.
angelkiller Pentium D 945 3.4GHz DDR2-800 2266 2614 2179 1841 2209 667 commie? Windows 7
angelkiller Athlon 3000 2.4GHz DDR-400 1852 1778 2242 1537 1379 813 commune?
JrRacinFan E5200 3.33 Ghz DDR2 800 CL4 3631 4639 3873 2359 1806 1090 24/7 clocks
FordGT90Concept 2x E5310 1.60 Ghz FBDIMM-667 4691 6240 5655 1459 1739 2932 TYAN__ D1808___
hoss331 Q9650 4.34 Ghz DDR2 1157 7841 10418 8596 3845 4176 1807 Vista 64
FordGT90Concept Core i7 920 2.77 GHz DDR3-1066 7245 7791 9095 4333 4686 2616 HT and Turbo on (2.66 GHz stock)
chuck216 Athlon x2 5600+ 2.90 Ghz DDR2 667 3042 3130 3932 1962 1783 1049 Vista 64 with 32 bit geekbench
wolf2009 Intel Q9450 3.20 GHz DDR2-800 5478 7417 6144 2367 2584 1712 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/136525
MRCL Intel E6300 1.86 GHz DDR2-667 2175 2488 2167 1722 2022 1169 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/136528
freakshow Core i7 920 4.1Ghz Gotta get back to on that one 10761 11833 13276 6530 6669 Vista x64 Ultimate
r1rhyder i7 920 4.2 Ghz DDR3 2000 11177 12034 13565 6994 8189 2661 Windows 7
chuck216 Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.50 Ghz DDR2 800 6368 7599 8547 2520 2136 1819 32 bit version
rickss69 Core i7 965 4189.6MHz DDR3 11533 12710 14367 6595 7379 2759 Game rig
jellyrole i7 920 D0 4Ghz 1600 Trident 10284 11659 12447 6017 6440 2571
Fatal Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.70 Ghz DDR2 1066 6766 8005 8823 3022 2725 1828 32 bit version
BarbaricSoul 2600k 4.20 Ghz DDR3 1600 12797 13242 1682 7976 9384 3046 2600k system in system specs
MetalRaceri7 3930k5.2GHzDDR3 21332076723498262799649141533993http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/537533
MetalRaceri7 3770k4.8GHzDDR3 21331533016261187879850109343193http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1319510
Aquinus i7 3820 4.62 Ghz DDR3-2400 (10-12-11-33-1T) 13131 13827 15091 8923 12254 2842 128.6Mhz bclk
chevy350 2600k 4.4GHz DDR3-1866 13228 13994 16661 7937 9120 4017 32bit 64 bit
Melvis FX-57 2.8 GHz DDR 500 2144 2103 2657 1627 1529 763 Windows XP 32
Melvis XP 2100 1.85Ghz DDR 266 1138 1195 1591 547 544 615 Going for Lowest Score
Melvis AMD X2 4600+ 2.4GHz DDR500 2618 2667 3397 1677 1605 1091 Windows XP 32
Melvis Phenom II X4 965 3.4 Ghz DDR3 1333 6317 7353 8291 2960 2501 1858 Windows 7 64
Melvis AMD A8-5600k 3.8 Ghz DDR3 1333 6063 6427 7646 3884 3612 1596 Customers Comp
Melvis A10-5800K 3.8/4.2 Ghz DDR3 1333 6697 7112 8712 3959 3671 1762 Customers Comp
Arctucas i7 950 4273 MHz DDR3 1600 11207 12518 13688 6496 7366 2622 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1373607
Melvis AMD FX 8350 4.0/4.2 Ghz DDR3 1600 9773 11312 12821 4304 4657 2443 Main Rig
HammerON i7 970 4.0 GHz DDR 3 1066 13848 15684 18003 5612 9360 3462 Win7
Compgeke Atom Z520 1.33 GHz DDR2 533 725 625 757 803 704 529 Dell mini 10
de.das.dude AMD X4 945 3.0 GHz DDR2-1066 5255 6443 6958 2004 1642 1751.7 Win7 x64 result
TRWOV Core i5-2320 3.5Ghz DDR3-1600 8407 8807 9119 7079 7176 2402 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1610900
AphexDreamer FX6100 4530Mhz DDR3 1333 9916 10043 14350 4237 5314 2189 Main Rig http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1610983
rickss69 980X 3.99GHz DDR3 1600 13691 15670 17432 5622 9797 3431 gamer
phoen i7-3770K 4.80GHz DDR3-2400 14932 15914 17017 10100 13869 3110 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1612049
TRWOV QX6800 3.19Ghz DDR400 5407 7464 6249 2155 1771 1694 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1614648
rickss69 980X 4.3 GHz DDR3 15121 17961 18910 5949 10268 3484 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1619412
rickss69 Atom N270 1.60 GHz DDR2 800 856 682 802 1021 500 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1620264
Durvelle27 AMD FX 4100 4.6GHz DDR3 1333 7612 7471 10644 4231 4261 1655 Main Rig
Melvis AMD E2-1800 1.7GHz DDR3 1333 1782 1731 2051 1442 1700 1048 Lenovo x131e
phoen i7-3770K 4.90GHz DDR3-2400 15825 16287 19009 10237 14248 3229 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1629545
uuuaaaaaa AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition 4013Mhz DDR3 1333 10100 12067 13646 4000 3011 2516 http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1629839


================================================== ============================


========== WANTED ================================================== ===========

Would someone kindly run the following:

Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper!
Nehalem-EP
Xeon E5400 systems
Xeon E5500 systems
Xeon E7 systems
A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2.
Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish!
Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer
Atom D2600/D2800
Via Nano or C7
AMD C-350 and C-450 APUs


Favourite "multicore" benchmarks, Fritz, Geekbench, EVEREST PhotoWorxx

alexp999 Mar 18, 2009 10:36 PM

http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/geekbenchalexp999.png

alexp999 | Q6600 | 3.6 GHz | DDR2 1000 | 6262 | 8271 | 6987 | 2926 | 3369 | Not optimized

erocker Mar 18, 2009 10:39 PM

When I run it, it says it's not a valid Win32 application. :ohwell:

alexp999 Mar 18, 2009 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by erocker (Post 1269071)
When I run it, it says it's not a valid Win32 application. :ohwell:

Is that the installer or the program?

alexp999 Mar 18, 2009 10:42 PM

I ran it fine on Win 7 x64

Psychoholic Mar 18, 2009 10:49 PM

it says 2.79ghz, but its really 3.8 with turbo so 3.99ghz

http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/444.jpg

lemonadesoda Mar 19, 2009 12:12 AM

Atom330:
lemonadesoda | Atom 330 | 1.6 Ghz | DDR2 400 | 1211 | 1403 | 1225 | 961 | 995 | 757 | Shuttle X27D

Psychoholic Mar 19, 2009 02:14 AM

did a 3.6ghz run with HT Turned off for a clock vs clock comparison with the q6600 for curiosity.


PSYCHoHoLiC | i7 920 | 3.6 Ghz | DDR3 1098 |


http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/23322.jpg

Xternal Mar 19, 2009 02:56 AM

http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/Capture003651.jpg
Xternal | E7200 | 3.16 Ghz | DDR 800 | 3487 | 4549| 3790 | 1981 | 1730 | 1103 | Meh...Winxp

A Cheese Danish Mar 19, 2009 03:34 AM

Could not load screen shot atm...:shadedshu
A Cheese Danish | AMD Opteron 170 | 2.95 GHz | 4GB DDR400 | 3091 | 3251 | 4147 | 1677 | 1665 | 1048 | Windows XP x64 running the x86 version of geekbench

Binge Mar 19, 2009 03:41 AM

http://img.techpowerup.org/090318/geekbench1.jpg
BiNGE Molly i7 | i7 920 | 4.2GHz | DDR3 1600 | 11113 | 12182 | 13919 | 6305 | 7169 | 2646 | Vista 64

slyfox2151 Mar 19, 2009 04:17 AM

http://img.techpowerup.org/090319/bench.jpg



Slyfox2151 | E7300 | 3.333mhz | DDR2 800mhz | 3686 | 4772 | 3975 | 2136 | 1978 | 1116 | Vista / anti viri running

lemonadesoda Mar 19, 2009 11:34 PM

On ASUS DSEB:
lemonadesoda | L5420 x2 | 3.0 Ghz | FB-DIMM 800 | 8511 | 12286 | 10566 | 1775 | 1586 | 2837 | Single channel FB.DIMM at the moment

DOM Mar 19, 2009 11:49 PM

DOM | X3350 | 4GHz | DDR2 1066 | 7061 | 9523 | 7869 | 3171 | 3404 | 1765.25 | Vista Ultimate 64bit SP1

DanTheBanjoman Mar 20, 2009 10:14 AM

Why does Solaris get his own version?
http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/Capture043.jpg

lemonadesoda Mar 20, 2009 10:34 AM

I guess someone just hasnt compiled the build yet. Not a lot of call for it, possibly?

****

On another note, this benchmark is bringing my L/E5420 system to BSOD. I think it may be the northbridge/memory system. I can bench from cold boot up. But a warm machine BSODs. No problem with other benchmarks. Something I need to look into...

Dan, kindly do an OC L5310 system.

lemonadesoda Mar 20, 2009 10:34 AM

On ASUS P4P800-VM:
lemonadesoda | P4EE | 3.2 Ghz | DDR 400 | 1489 | 1595 | 1556 | 1290 | 1285 | 465 | Done over RDP, quite a lot of overhead

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/119814

I find it amazing that an Atom 330 can keep up with a P4EE 3.2Ghz. While the P4EE will game better (faster performance for the single core), for productivity software that can multithread, the Atom 330 is a perfect, cheap, silent replacement for such machines. Quite simply, if you have ANY P4 machines in your office, they should be immediately retired. Their power consumption/performance ratios as well as noise means they should hit the scrap heap. A $100 Intel Atom 330 board and a $20 stick of DDR2 will outperform it. The only point against this upgrade is the loss of AGP video cards and using onboard video... which we can do due to double TFT setups. :-(

DanTheBanjoman Mar 20, 2009 11:00 AM

http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/Capture044.jpg
Evil laptop.


You have L5420's, nice, been wanting those due to the x7 multiplier. Though actually buying them for the slight increase would be a waste.

lemonadesoda Mar 20, 2009 11:19 AM

I've mixed a L5420 and E5420. Same 45nm and same stepping. I would have preferred 2xL5420 for power reasons... but I took what I could get at a great price. The E5420 has active cooling. The L5420 has passive, but gets "hit" with a little airflow from the E5420 fan.

BSEL mod. FSB 1600.

I'm having stability troubles at the moment. I think it is the Northbridge/FB-DIMM. I hope this and not a issue with mixing CPUs. Stable when cold. Unstable when warm... therefore I suspect Northbrdge/FB-DIMM.

DanTheBanjoman Mar 20, 2009 11:25 AM

I have two HR-01 X's on my CPU's, single 120mm fan on them. BSEL to 1600 as well, can overclock further but have been lazy. I sShould raise voltage by a lot and see how far they go. Memory shouldn't be a real issue, two of my modules are 667Mhz forcing my memory to 667. I know they can do 780 at least. (they did on my X7) And my other two modules are 800 stock so should do 780 as well, even with the lower timings.

lemonadesoda Mar 20, 2009 11:36 AM

I have those too. But the Thermalright HR-01 X are a complete pain. Had I realised how their fixing mechanism for s771 worked, then I would have bought the Noctuas. The HR-01 X's are a disaster for mounting/unmounting due to the location of their bolting mechanism on s771. It takes forever and twisted fingers and a risk of slipped screwdrivers or spanners to install and remove. When you see how easy an Intel stock cooler or the Noctuas are to install... they are worth $20 more just for the time they save.

The Thermalright HR-01 is OK on s775 however. But absolutely cannot recommend them for s771 though!

DanTheBanjoman Mar 20, 2009 12:12 PM

I completely agree, they are a hell to install/remove. I actually made that comment on XS a few days ago. Though in the end it's performance that matters, it's not like I should be removing them every other day.
Also, they'd fit better on certain boards, being able to rotate them 90 degrees makes them nice. It's a shame few boards will allow that.

Marineborn Mar 20, 2009 12:22 PM

that bench told me im pretty much a noob, BAH at it

btarunr Mar 20, 2009 04:09 PM

At 2.40 GHz: http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench...922&key=589338

btarunr | X4 9750 | 2.40 GHz | Ganged DDR2-1066 | 4372 | 4795 | 5536 | 2902 | 1765 | 1821.66 | Linux x64

I disabled Cool'n'Quiet and C1E from the BIOS. When enabled, Linux keeps playing with the CPU speeds on a per-core basis. It is likely that Core 0 clock speed was 1.20 GHz in my previous run, which is why the result looked funny. Count this:

http://img.techpowerup.org/090320/bta512.png

lemonadesoda Mar 20, 2009 10:20 PM

That's more like it! I was thinking the Phenom had passed out.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.