Introduction

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/logo.jpg

NVIDIA's latest card on the graphics market right now is the GeForce GTX 275. Like all other GTX 2xx cards it is based on NVIDIA's GT200 GPU. While it doesn't bring anything new technology wise. It still has interesting specs: It is basically half a GTX 295 running at 633 / 1134 / 1404 MHz (core/memory/shader). You can see it as a GeForce GTX 285 with a 448-bit memory interface, or you could see it as a GTX 260 with 240 shaders and higher clocks.

For their GeForce GTX 275 OC, Inno3D went with a P897 based design and simply increased the core, shader and memory clocks.

<table border="1" class="resulttable" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
<th></th>
<td>GeForce <br />
9800 GTX</td>
<td>GeForce GTS <br>
250 1 GB</td>
<td>GeForce <br />
GTX 260</td>
<td>Radeon<br />
HD 4870</td>
<td>Radeon<br />
HD 4890</td>
<td>GeForce <br />
GTX 275</td>
<td><strong>Inno3D GTX <br>
275 OC</strong></td>
<td>GeForce <br />
GTX 280</td>
<td>Radeon<br />
HD 4870 X2</td>
<td>GeForce <br />
GTX 285</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Shader units </th>
<td align="right">128</td>
<td align="right">128</td>
<td align="right">192</td>
<td align="right">800</td>
<td align="right">800</td>
<td align="right">240</td>
<td align="right"><strong>240</strong></td>
<td align="right">240</td>
<td align="right">2x 800</td>
<td align="right">240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>ROPs</th>
<td align="right">16</td>
<td align="right">16</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right">16</td>
<td align="right">16</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right"><strong>28</strong></td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">2x 16</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>GPU</th>
<td align="right">G92</td>
<td align="right">G92</td>
<td align="right">GT200</td>
<td align="right">RV770</td>
<td align="right">RV790</td>
<td align="right">GT200</td>
<td align="right"><strong>GT200</strong></td>
<td align="right">GT200</td>
<td align="right">2x RV770</td>
<td align="right">GT200b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Transistors</th>
<td align="right">754M </td>
<td align="right">754M </td>
<td align="right">1400M </td>
<td align="right">956M</td>
<td align="right">959M</td>
<td align="right">1400M </td>
<td align="right"><strong>1400M </strong></td>
<td align="right">1400M </td>
<td align="right">2x 956M</td>
<td align="right">1400M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Size</th>
<td align="right">512 MB</td>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
<td align="right">896 MB</td>
<td align="right">512 MB </td>
<td align="right">1024 MB </td>
<td align="right">896 MB</td>
<td align="right"><strong>896 MB</strong></td>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
<td align="right">2x 1024 MB </td>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Bus Width </th>
<td align="right">256 bit </td>
<td align="right">256 bit </td>
<td align="right">448 bit </td>
<td align="right">256 bit </td>
<td align="right">256 bit </td>
<td align="right">448 bit </td>
<td align="right"><strong>448 bit </strong></td>
<td align="right">512 bit </td>
<td align="right">2x 256 bit </td>
<td align="right">512 bit </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Core Clock</th>
<td align="right">675 MHz </td>
<td align="right">738 MHz </td>
<td align="right">576 MHz </td>
<td align="right">750 MHz </td>
<td align="right">850 MHz </td>
<td align="right">633 MHz </td>
<td align="right"><strong>700 MHz </strong></td>
<td align="right">602 MHz </td>
<td align="right">750 MHz </td>
<td align="right">648 MHz </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Clock</th>
<td align="right">1100 MHz </td>
<td align="right">1100 MHz </td>
<td align="right">999 MHz </td>
<td align="right">900 MHz </td>
<td align="right">975 MHz </td>
<td align="right">1134 MHz </td>
<td align="right"><strong>1210 MHz </strong></td>
<td align="right">1107 MHz </td>
<td align="right">900 MHz </td>
<td align="right">1242 MHz </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Price</th>
<td align="right">$160</td>
<td align="right">$149</td>
<td align="right">$240</td>
<td align="right">$190</td>
<td align="right">$249</td>
<td align="right">$249</td>
<td align="right"><strong>$240</strong></td>
<td align="right">$315</td>
<td align="right">$425</td>
<td align="right">$350</td>
</tr>
</table>

Packaging & Contents

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...age1_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...age2_small.jpg
Inno3D's package uses metal highlights and a pretty lady to catch your attention. All the important product highlights can be found on the front of the package. The design looks a bit too "stickery" to me, but works very well.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ents_small.jpg

You will receive:

Graphics card
Documentation + Driver CD
DVI Adapter + HDMI Adapter
PCI-Express power cable
TV out cables
Warmonger full game + Company of Heroes full game
NVIDIA 20% off Mirror's Edge coupon
SPDIF audio cable

The Card

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ard1_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ard2_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ard3_small.jpg
Apart from the sticker the card looks like any other GTX 260 / 280 card. It uses two cooling slots as expected. Unlike the Zotac GTX 275, the Inno3D GeForce GTX 275 uses a green PCB.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...puts_small.jpg
The card has two DVI ports, the most common output configuration today. If you want to use the card with your big TV screen you can use the included HDMI adapter. In case you need an analog port you can also use the included DVI adapter.
For HDMI Audio, NVIDIA requires you to feed an external audio source, for example from your motherboard's on-board audio, to the card via SPDIF cable. AMD on the other hand has integrated a sound device inside their GPUs which is the easier solution for most users.
The gold plated connectors are a nice touch but do not actually improve signal quality or anything.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I.../sli_small.jpg
You may combine two or three GTX 275 cards in SLI for improved performance or better image quality.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ront_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...back_small.jpg

Here are the front and the back of the card, high-res versions are also available (front, back). If you choose to use these images for voltmods etc, please include a link back to this site or let us post your article.

A Closer Look

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ler1_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ler2_small.jpg
The cooler of the GTX 275 is identical to that on the GTX 285 or 55 nm GTX 260.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ower_small.jpg
Two six pin power connectors are present on the card. Both are required for operation of the card. Further to the right in the picture you can see the white input for SPDIF audio.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mory_small.jpg
The GDDR3 memory chips are made by Hynix and carry the model number H5RS5223CFR-N2C. With a cycle time of 0.8 ns, they are specified to run at 1200 MHz.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...vreg_small.jpg
The ADP4100 voltage controller has been spotted first on the NVIDIA P897 design for the GTX 260. It does not support the I2C interface which means software voltage control will be almost impossible to implement.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I.../gpu_small.jpg
The GPU is the NVIDIA GT200b, which is made in a 55 nm process with 1.4 billion transistors.

Test System

<table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="ramtable">
<tr align="center">
<th colspan="2" scope="row" style="font-size:larger;text-align:center">Test System</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th width="150" scope="row">CPU:</th>
<td scope="row">Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.8 GHz<br />(Bloomfield, 8192 KB Cache)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Motherboard:</th>
<td scope="row">Gigabyte X58 Extreme<br />Intel X58, Kindly provided by Gigabyte</</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Memory:</th>
<td scope="row">2x 1024MB OCZ DDR3 Platinum @ 1140 MHz 6-6-6-19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Harddisk:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">WD Raptor 740ADFD 74 GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Power Supply:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">BFG ES-800 800W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Software:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">Windows Vista SP1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Drivers:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">NVIDIA: ForceWare 181.20, GTS 250: 182.06, GTX 275: 185.63<br />ATI: Catalyst 9.1, HD 4890: 8.592.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Display:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row"><div style="float:right">http://www.techpowerup.com/wizzard/zotac.jpg</div>LG Electronics Flatron<br />W3000H 30" 2560x1600 DVI-D</td>
</tr>
</table>

All video card results were obtained on this exact system with the exact same configuration.
All games were set to their highest quality setting

Each benchmark was tested at the following settings and resolution:

1024 x 768, No Anti-aliasing, No anisotropic filtering. This is a standard resolution without demanding display settings.
1280 x 1024, 2x Anti-aliasing, 8x anisotropic filtering. Common resolution for most smaller flatscreens today (17" - 19"). A bit of eye candy turned on in the drivers.
1680 x 1050, 4x Anti-aliasing, 16x anisotropic filter. Most common widescreen resolution on larger displays (19" - 22"). Very good looking driver graphics settings.
1920 x 1200, 4x Anti-aliasing, 16x anisotropic filter. Typical widescreen resolution for large displays (22" - 26"). Very good looking driver graphics settings.

Call of Duty 4

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/cod4.jpg
Call of Duty 4 is a first-person shooter that is built on the award winning Call of Duty Series. It is the first version to play in modern times. In a near-future conflict between the United States, Europe and Russia you get to play as a United States Marine and a British SAS operative. The engine is Infinity Ward's own creation and has true dynamic lighting, depth of field, dynamic shadows and HDR. Even though the game plot is scripted you will find yourself in intense battles, often working together with computer controlled team mates.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...4_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Call of Juarez

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...llofjuarez.jpg
Call of Juarez was one of the first DX10 titles available on the market, that's why it was heavily used to demonstrate the benefits of DirectX 10. It runs on the Chrome Engine created by the polish game studio Techland. This first-person shooter game is set in a Wild West theme with the plot unfolding from the perspective of two characters: Billy and Reverend Ray. Each offers a different play style to keep the game interesting. Also included in the game is a "Concentration Mode" which slows down time in hectic situations - a feature first pioneered by the Max Payne Series.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...j_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Company Of Heroes

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...nyofheroes.jpg
The real-time strategy game Company of Heroes is set during World War II where you take two American companies through several fights all over France to liberate the country from German occupation. Company of Heroes is the first game to use Relic's next-generation engine "Essence Engine" which includes support for HDR lighting, Shader Model 3.0, normal mapping, dynamic lighting and shadows. You are able to zoom in from the tactical view of the battle field to see the individual units fighting. Often you catch yourself admiring the detailed animations of the soldiers while the fight around you is raging.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...h_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Crysis

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ges/crysis.jpg
After the tremendous success of Far Cry, the German game studio Crytek released their latest shooter Crysis in 2007. The game was by far the most hyped and anticipated game in 2007, the forums were full of "Can my system run Crysis?" threads because of the high hardware requirements of this game. Just like in Far Cry the plot evolves on a small island with a thick and richly detailed jungle world. A lot of attention has been given to small details like correct physics. For example when you fire on a tree trunk, it will shatter and the tree will fall over leaving a stump behind. Enemies in a car can be stopped by shooting the tire of the car. The game graphics are by far the best ever seen in a PC game so far, yet the game still runs well on most computers.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Enemy Territory: Quake Wars

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/etqw.jpg
The first-person shooter Enemy Territory: Quake Wars is set in the science-fiction universe of Quake and requires several classes to work together to achieve certain goals on a map. In the campaign mode you gain experience which you can use to buy upgrades for your class. The player gets to pick from five classes of either the Global Defense Force or the Strogg faction. As underlying game engine, the successful id Software Doom 3 engine has been licensed, but several features like MegaTextures have been added, giving the outdoor world a much more detailed appearance.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...w_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Far Cry

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ges/farcry.jpg
Far Cry was released in early 2004 by the new development studio Crytek. It quickly became a massive success because it was one of the first titles to take you in a beautiful 3D outdoor world. Far Cry was one of the most demanding games at its time. Even with today's video cards you can still see big differences in frame rates, especially at the higher resolutions.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...y_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Far Cry 2

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/farcry2.jpg
Four years after the success of Far Cry, Ubisoft has published the sequel called Far Cry 2. While the first part was set on an island, Far Cry 2 takes you deep into Africa with game play that resembles Grand Theft Auto much more than the original Far Cry, which was a classical 3D shooter. Ubisoft engineered a completely new 3D engine called "Dunia" which offers a large amount of popular features like DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 support, destructible environments, physics and non-scripted AI while not being as much of a resource hog as Crytek's CryEngine.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...2_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

FEAR

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/fear.jpg
The first person shooter F.E.A.R, developed by Monolith Game Studios, was released in Fall 2005 and has a great 3D engine that uses a large number of shading and shadow effects to accurately model the game world. In addition to that it features a realistic physics engine that lets you interact with many objects in the game world. The game was voted game of the year by several publications.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...r_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Left 4 Dead

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...images/l4d.jpg
Valve's Left 4 Dead is a first person shooter game that offers cooperative elements in both single and multiplayer. You and your team of three buddies end up in a nightmare full of raging zombies - hordes of them. L4D is based on the latest version of Valve's Source Engine which has been used in titles like Counter-Strike: Source and Team Fortress 2 before. There are several incremental improvements in the engine like self shadowing, better fog and lighting effects and post-effect shaders that add to the immersion effect.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...d_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Prey

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/prey.jpg
Prey is based on a highly modified 3D engine made by id Software. This first person shooter brought a completely new way of gaming to the genre. In many levels you find yourself walking upside down or on the walls. This adds a completely new aspect to the gaming experience in this genre.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...y_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Quake 4

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ges/quake4.jpg
The Quake titles are among the most successful first person games. Developed by id Software, the famous game studio that brought you DOOM, you find yourself in a sci-fi world that is full of aliens and shocking effects. The main focus of the game is the single player story line. Quake 4 puts you on the home planet of the Strogg. In a number of missions you and your fellow marines will encounter all sorts of enemies, including some really huge aliens.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...4_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Splinter Cell 3: Chaos Theory

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...intercell3.jpg
The Splinter Cell Series is endorsed by popular book author Tom Clancy. In the 2005 title Splinter Cell 3: Chaos Theory you play the NSA agent Sam Fisher who has to use stealth and finesse to make his way through a number of levels mainly set in eastern Asia. The game is based on a modified Unreal 2 engine with support for HDR, normal mapping, parallax mapping and soft shadows. A patch added Shader Model 2.0 support for ATI in addition to the Shader Model 3.0 support which was already part of the original shipping game.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...t_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/stalker.jpg
Before its release in 2007, S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl was one of the most hyped games of the last years. This RPG/FPS hybrid game is set a few years in the future, after a nuclear disaster occurs at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The release of radiation causes strange things like mutations in the nearby area. You take the role of a Stalker who seeks fame and riches in the contaminated area around Chernobyl. The game engine features all the latest buzzwords like HDR, bullet physics, skeletal animation, soft shadows and weather effects. Stalker's vast outside world is richly modeled, you can interact with a large number of objects in the game thanks to the physics engine.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...r_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. - Clear Sky

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s/clearsky.jpg
STALKER Clear Sky is GSC Gameworld's prequel to the 2007 hit "STALKER". Just like in the first part the game is set around the Russian area of Chernobyl and Pripyat, most well known for the nuclear accident that occurred there. You play the role of a mercenary who spends his days in The Zone trying to make a living. The Zone is an area which is affected by so-called anomalies which cause mutants to appear and laws of physics to change. While you investigate these anomalies the plot leads up to the events that happened right before the first game starts. A new in-game faction system encourages you to befriend various groups in The Zone in exchange for information or items. While the graphics of Clear Sky are based on the first Stalker game engine, there are numerous improvements, including support for DirectX10 and depth-of-field/volumetric effects.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...y_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Team Fortress 2

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mfortress2.jpg
Team Fortress 2 by the famous people from Valve software builds on an improved Half-Life 2 engine to deliver an action packed, team oriented, comic graphics first person shooter game. Even though the game features nice graphics, it tends to be very CPU limited, especially on lower resolutions. Players get to team up being either RED or BLU with a selection of nine classes. Each class offers a different play style, just like in the original Team Fortress games.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...2_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Unreal Tournament 3

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...images/ut3.jpg
The fourth game in Epic's highly successful Unreal Tournament Series is simply called Unreal Tournament 3. It is based on the all-new Unreal 3 engine which is a major step forward from the previous engine. The game principle is centered about an arena style gameplay where several contestants try to reach a certain kill count or capture a flag for example. As you would expect from a new 2007 title, the graphics are top notch, with large and detailed textures. One major drawback of the way the engine is designed is that there is no support for Anti-Aliasing.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...3_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

World In Conflict

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...inconflict.jpg
The realtime strategy game World In Conflict by Massive Entertainment is set in 1989 taking the player through a fictional conflict during the collapse of the Soviet Union. Unlike other RTS games, World in Conflict is not centered around building a base, you command units on the battlefield with a number of reinforcement points available to replace lost troops.
Massive's Masstech Game Engine makes heavy use of level-of-detail techniques which allow you to zoom in closely on the action displaying fights in high-fidelity with a large number of effects.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...c_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Folding@home

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/folding.jpg
GPU accelerated computing is the latest trend to speed up computationally intense applications. One of the first projects to implement such a GPGPU method is Folding@home. Participants install a small program on their computer, the "Folding Client", which downloads work units from a server to be processed on the system.
In the past folding has been performed on on the CPU. Recently new clients have been developed for Folding on PlayStation 3, ATI and NVIDIA CUDA.

We used version 6.20r1 to download a work unit and fold it using whatever GPU acceleration is available. Due to the different GPU designs, different types of work unit were used. However, for most Folding users the PPD (Points Per Day) metric is the most important because that's what determines their ranking in the system.

Please note that we will not start multiple client instances. If a manufacturer chooses to implement native support for multiple GPUs, our client will benefit from that however. For comparison: a PlayStation 3 gets about 900 PPD, a Core 2 Duo E8400 about 550 PPD per processor core.

If you want to join the good cause, use team number 50711, which is TechPowerUps own Folding Team.

I encountered major difficulties using the reviewer's driver with Folding@Home. Either the "[Folding] core encountered an internal error" or there were some DLLs missing. I am sure that AMD or Stanford will address this problem in a future version.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/folding.gif

3DMark03

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s/3dmark03.jpg
Futuremark Corporation is the number one player in the world of synthetic benchmarking. The 3DMark series is the most popular test suite for video card testing and is used by gamers, overclockers and manufacturers alike to determine how fast their hardware is. Even though it is a few years old, 3DMark03 can easily stress today's video cards.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...3_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

3DMark05

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s/3dmark05.jpg
Another benchmark from Futuremark is 3DMark05 which comes with four completely new game tests that make massive use of shaders and lighting effects. 3DMark05 is a great test for modern video card architectures - in some tests you are often close to the 30 fps mark, below which your games will feel sluggish.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...5_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

3DMark06

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s/3dmark06.jpg
Even though it's based on Futuremark's 3DMark05, the new 3DMark06 adds new tests for Shader Model 3.0 and HDR rendering. It is also the first 3DMark to incorporate a CPU score into the final 3DMark score. All tests have received an overhaul, for example in the Canyon Flight test you can now see beautiful sun glare effects with the help of High Dynamic Range rendering.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...6_1024_768.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1280_1024.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1680_1050.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I..._1920_1200.gif

Power Consumption

Cooling modern video cards is becoming more and more difficult, especially when users are asking for quiet cooling solutions. That's why the engineers are now paying much more attention to power consumption of new video card designs.

<table border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="ramtable" width="450">
<tr align="center">
<th colspan="2" scope="row" style="font-size:larger;text-align:center">Test System</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th width="150" scope="row">CPU:</th>
<td scope="row">Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.8 GHz<br />(Bloomfield, 8192 KB Cache)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Motherboard:</th>
<td scope="row">Gigabyte X58 Extreme<br />Intel X58, Kindly provided by Gigabyte</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row">Memory:</th>
<td scope="row">2x 1024MB OCZ DDR3 Platinum @ 1140 MHz 6-6-6-19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Harddisk:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">WD Raptor 740ADFD 74 GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Power Supply:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">BFG ES-800 800W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" scope="row">Software:</th>
<td valign="top" scope="row">Windows Vista SP1</td>
</tr>
</table>

In order to characterize a video card's power consumption, the whole system's mains power draw was measured. This means that these numbers include CPU, Memory, HDD, Video card and PSU inefficiency.

The three result values are as following:

Idle: Windows sitting at the desktop (1024x768 32-bit) all windows closed, drivers installed.
Average: 3DMark03 Nature at 1280x1024, 6xAA, 16xAF. This results in the highest power consumption. Average of all readings (two per second) while the test was rendering (no title screen).
Peak: 3DMark03 Nature at 1280x1024, 6xAA, 16xAF. This results in the highest power consumption. Highest single reading

The power consumption of the Inno3D GTX 275 OC is surprisingly low. Just like the actual rendering performance, power draw is very similar to that of a GTX 285. Our last GTX 275 review was a Zotac GTX 275 Amp! Edition which showed much higher power consumption, a possible explanation is that the Zotac card was running at a much higher GPU voltage than the card from Inno3D.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...power_idle.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...er_average.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...power_peak.gif

Fan Noise

In the past years users would accept everything just to get more performance. Nowadays this has changed with people being more aware of the fan noise and power consumption of their graphic cards.
In order to properly test the fan noise a card emits we are using a Bruel & Kjaer 2236 sound level meter (~$4,000) which has the measurement range and accuracy we are looking for.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...2236_small.jpg http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...jaer_setup.jpg
The tested graphics card is installed in a system that is completely passively cooled. That is passive PSU, passive CPU cooler, passive cooling on the motherboard and Solid-State HDD.
This setup allows us to eliminate secondary noise sources and test only the video card. To be more compliant with standards like DIN 45635 (we are not claiming to be fully DIN 45635 certified) the measurement is conducted at 100 cm distance and 160 cm over the floor. The ambient background noise level in the room is well below 20 dbA for all measurements. Please note that the dbA scale is not linear, it is logarithmic. 40 dbA is not twice as loud as 20 dbA. A 3 dbA increase results in double the sound pressure. The human hearing is a bit different and it is generally accepted that a 10 dbA increase doubles the perceived sound level.

In idle the fan noise is very acceptable for a card in this performance class. But under load the fan gets quite noisy. Considering that the load temperatures are in the 90°C range, I don't see a way how the card could be quieter, unless a different cooler would be used.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...noise_idle.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...noise_load.gif

Performance Summary

To create this graph we took all performance results of the four resolutions we tested, threw them together and calculated the relative performance of each card, compared to our review sample. In a fifth graph we also combined all tests in all resolutions to calculate the total relative performance of the review sample.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/perfrel.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...rfrel_1024.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...rfrel_1280.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...rfrel_1680.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...rfrel_1920.gif

Performance per Watt

This graph was created by taking the relative performance numbers and putting them in contrast to the average power consumption results. To offset power consumption of the rest of the system we subtracted 150 W from the average consumption.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...s/perfwatt.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...fwatt_1024.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...fwatt_1280.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...fwatt_1680.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...fwatt_1920.gif

Performance per Dollar

If you are looking for the best bang for the buck, then you will love this graph. We looked up the current USD price of each card on the popular online shop Newegg and used it and the relative performance numbers to calculate the Performance per Dollar Index.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...perfdollar.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ollar_1024.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ollar_1280.gif

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ollar_1680.gif http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...ollar_1920.gif

Overclocking

To find the maximum overclock of our card we used a combination of ATITool's successor and our benchmarking suite.
The overclocks listed here were achieved with the default fan and voltage settings as defined in the VGA BIOS. Please note that every single sample overclocks differently, that's why our results here can only serve as a guideline for what you can expect from your card.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/gpuz_oc.gif

The final overclocks of our card are 735 MHz core (5% overclock, 16% over reference clocks) and 1305 MHz Memory (8% overclock, 15% over reference). The overclock over the stock frequencies is nice but not that impressive. When looking at the clocks from a reference design perspective they look much better. 15% without any tweaking is really nice and will ensure another performance boost.

Overclocked Performance

Using these clock frequencies we ran a quick test of Call of Duty 4 to evaluate the gains from overclocking.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...es/perf_oc.gif
The actual 3D performance gained is 4.2%, 13% over reference.

Temperatures

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/I...mages/temp.gif
Idle temperatures of the Inno3D GTX 275 OC are comfortably low. The load temperatures are at what I would consider a safe maximum. As you saw on our noise testing page, the fan is already running really fast which means the thermal capacity of the cooler is pretty much maxxed out.

Value and Conclusion

<table width="100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" id="result">
<tr><th>http://www.techpowerup.com/images/dollar.gif</th>
<td>

According to Inno3D the GTX 275 OC will be available at "approx. $240 USD however it [pricing] might vary according to region".

</td>
</tr><tr>
<th>http://www.techpowerup.com/images/thumbup.gif</th>
<td>

Great performance - beats GTX 285!
Overclocked out of the box
Additional overclocking potential available
Relatively low power consumption
Great price (for a high-end card)
Cooler blows hot air out of the case
Two full game versions included
Support for CUDA / PhysX

</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>http://www.techpowerup.com/images/thumbdown.gif</th>
<td>

Noisy under load
No architectural improvements

</td></tr>
<tr><th>9.4</th>
<td>Even though there are no fundamental architecture improvements, the Inno3D GTX 275 OC does not disappoint. On average it outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 285. If that is still not enough performance for you, you could do some additional overclocking for even more performance. Hardcore overclockers might be a bit disappointed by the use of a non-Volterra voltage regulator which means that there is no software control for the GPU voltage.<br />
The only drawback of this card is that the fan is ramping up to be quite noisy under load. Unfortunately it seems that there is no way around this with the stock cooler since even at this high fan speed the card is running at around 90°C - no room left for optimizations here. Since Inno3D has been working with Arctic Cooling in the past (we reviewed their iChill GTX 260 here) I have high hopes that we will see an iChill GTX 275 soon.
</td></tr>
<tr><th></th><td>http://www.techpowerup.com/images/editorschoice.gif</td></tr>
</table>