View Single Post
Old Jan 19, 2009, 01:27 PM   #10
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

That cache is absolutely tiny, but if these are dirt cheap and overclock like crazy then why not. Multi is high (13), but having 3 megs on a dual already I don't feel like going backwards

edit: IMO they should be renamed to Q5000 (or even Q3000) series. Q6600 had 8MB cache already and something "higher" to have 4th of that is silly.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by OnBoard; Jan 19, 2009 at 01:34 PM.
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote