View Single Post
Old Jun 14, 2009, 07:32 PM   #23
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
 
newtekie1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 17,904 (6.47/day)
Thanks: 785
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,754 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
At lower resolutions which basically negates the argument. Why buy either card for lower resolutions? What does it matter anyway as both cards will run everything at any settings. I think people get caught up too much in a few FPS.
Look at the graphs broken down by resolution, the top two resolutions tested: 1680x1050 and 1920x1200

The two cards are virtually even. No point in paying a dime more for either card. Right now, even if I assume you can get the Toxic for $230 like you say, the GTX275 for $10 cheaper is a better buy. $10 is $10, if you can get the same performance and save $10 I say do it. I'm not caught up in a few FPS, to me the cards are equal, I'm caught up on the $$$.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintface View Post
he has to justify his purchase, dont mind him
You mean I have to justify my purchase of the HD4890? I don't really get how that makes sense in the context.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAlex View Post
OK...the graphs show that the Toxic beats the GTX 275 3 times out of 5.
Anything else no point in buying the cards then.
The two cards are equal in my eyes, and I'll quote myself:

Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1 View Post
...I'll just say the two are equal...
Quote:
Originally Posted by erocker View Post
Lol, so do I, I guess! Really though, you can't go wrong with either card as by the amount one beats out the other is miniscule.
That is my point here, it isn't about which performs better, as they are both so close it won't matter, but the Toxic being more expensive and having no overclocking head room makes the GTX275 a better option.

Quote:
Originally Posted by intel igent View Post
i still think ATi has better quality GFX than Nvidia

i will trade a few FPS for better quality anyday

can we really tell the difference between 35FPS and 37FPS?
I use both, I certainly can't tell the difference in IQ between the two. I've read articles where they freeze frame the game and zoom in so far both images look completely pixelated, and you can't even tell what you are looking at, and some say ATi is better and others say nVidia is better. Personally, I don't freeze frame in the middle of my games and press my face against the monitor...
__________________

Rig1: System Specs.
Rig2: A8-5600K@4.4GHz / AsRock FM2A75 Pro4 / 8GB Corsair DDR3-1600 9-9-9-24 / HD7560D / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB WD Green + 3x3TB WD RED in RAID5
Rig3: Athlon X2 4200+ / M4A79 Deluxe / 4GB G.Skill Pi DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 / GT430 / Sony DVD-Burner / 500GB WD
Rig4: Phenom II x6 1605T @ 3.6GHz / Asus M5A99X Evo / 8GB PNY DDR3-1600 9-9-9 / GTX470 & GTX470 / Samsung DVD-Burner / 1.5TB Seagate
newtekie1 is offline  
25 Million points folded for TPU
Reply With Quote