Thread: Process Monitor
View Single Post
Old Feb 14, 2010, 04:33 AM   #24
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,563 (6.29/day)
Thanks: 1,751
Thanked 2,594 Times in 1,959 Posts

System Specs

Wait...let me clear something up: There is Process CPU time which tells you how much time a processor spent on a given process. This only tells you overall CPU use, not by core (an average of all cores).

There is also load percentages per core. It tells you how burdened each core is but it doesn't tell you what process is burdening that given core.

Which is more valuable to you? Both?


I guess the point I am trying to make is that the most accurate way to tell how many cores a given process is using is to take total process time and compare it to the number of cores. I could graph that...
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote