View Single Post
Old Jun 21, 2010, 05:09 PM   #6
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 15,035 (7.22/day)
Thanks: 792
Thanked 13,033 Times in 5,720 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imsochobo View Post
Nvidia does have a slight shot with this.
Still shows, 150W its still a high number!
atleast when its about to be competing with 5770 (most likely be in between 5770 and 5830)

But its price does seem appealing, 336 cuda cores is acceptable, 192 bit ? 256 would be good on this chip if those cuda cores are as effective as GTX285's.
But those in 465 470 480 doesnt show that.

Only to wait n see, but pricepoint does look like a relif for me, push ati where it "hurts" them, ati have loads of headroom on prices.
The 192-bit interface most likely is to reduce the pin-count. At 1000 MHz, 192-bit GDDR5 still has 96 GB/s, and at 1200 MHz it's 115 GB/s. That's plenty of bandwidth compared to the 76.8 GB/s HD 5770 gets @ 1200 MHz.
__________________

Gadgets, Gaming, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote