Quote:
Originally Posted by brandonwh64
9600GT is ideal, u can use something lower that than but something with 96 shaders would preform physx top notch, 32 shaders work but i have seen some cases were it made it worse.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by [Ion]
Anything above a 9800GT or GTS250 is overkill. I have a 9600GT for PhysX and it seems to be plenty, don't notice any difference between it and a GTS250
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf
GT240 is the perfect fit IMO, a touch of overclocking on the shaders alone makes for some extra goodness too.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtekie1
GT240 is definitely ideal.
|
Seriously? So you are saying that I could pick up one of these and follow Fits' guide for hybrid installation and check this out?
As far as I'm aware, that requires me to use a leaked beta driver that has now been updated several times via official releases, have you experienced any issues running the latest games in a hybrid set up?
I'm still not convinced I want to do this, but if I did, which card would you pick up from the following list, bearing in mind that a XFX 7900 was the last Nvidia card I owned and I haven't kept up. I'm not aware of the advantages of the 2xx series over the 9xxx series, they are similarly priced in some instances, is it just a case of rebranding? Nor am I aware of the differences between the various GT / GTS / GTX models. The site's in Spanish because I want an idea of real-world price, but you can see where you need to go, and the task is to pick out the best and cheapest option to go ahead with a hybrid set up whilst ensuring that PhysX is as good as it possibly can be, thanks in advance:
http://www.alternate.es/html/categor...&l3=GeForce+9&