Oct 24, 2010, 02:04 PM
|
#25
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Britland
Posts: 1,531 (1.50/day)
Thanks: 322
Thanked 201 Times in 163 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wing_Zero
Just for example, in the gtx 460 SLI review, the scaling summary says that for the 1920x1200 resolution, it was 72%, vs the 59% of the 6850 crossfire.
But if you made the math yourself, (of if you just see the game performance), you see that the increase of performance with the 6850 CF @ 1920x1200 is about 90% every game.
The correct value is the one i've posted before (around 80%) and NOT 59%.
So, the scaling performance summary for the 6850 crossfire, is wrong. I've not done the math, as i've done for the 6850, for the 460 SLI. I may assume that it is right for the 460 SLI. But for the 6850 CF it is definitely wrong.
|
When i was reading through the review and looking at the frame rate increases from one to two cards i was expecting the kind of numbers that are shown on the 460 chart you just linked to.
__________________
The pastafarian jesus
|
|
|