Originally Posted by rickss69
Let me state this as simple as I can then...There is no way to police what is under discussion. Unless someone comes up with a way to do so it will remain as it always has.
And let me reply as simple and short as possible because you are obviously not getting it. That's not my concern. How about you think of something different other then policing others? Like change the scoreboard
Originally Posted by cadaveca
If you would come into the teamspeak, maybe you'd get to know me a bit better, and you'd know far better. I tihnk it's YOU that;s getting a bit worked up, and I think it's becuase noone has commented on your posting about the Catalyst profile, so now you are here getting the attention you tried to get earlier.
And I'm not calling any names, I'm just poniting out what to me, is obvious. My opinion might have no reference to fact, but that doesn't change the fact that i have only stated my opinion on how things should be handled, not called any names.
No need really. I think the drama you've added along with the name calling is more than enough for me. But if you think I'm upset let me put to you like this:
If someone provides information suggesting that decreasing the IQ increases performance (shocker, I know). Then why is it so hard for the scoreboard to change to reflect this? I don't find it necessary or relevant to call others names, etc to reflect what has been assumed to be "common knowledge".