View Single Post
Old Apr 29, 2011, 12:51 PM   #16
digibucc
3500 Posts
 
digibucc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: In the mountains :) Adirondacks in NY (US)
Posts: 3,705 (2.54/day)
Thanks: 4,533
Thanked 1,441 Times in 1,038 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
USB 2.0 is insufficient speed for 99.99% of users who are using it for any form of data transfer. It has sufficient bandwidth for most other applications (such as driving printers/scanners/input devices).
agreed there personally - not for the percentage.

if it were measured by what is possible, yes it's inordinately slow. but i highly doubt 99% of
users/consumers are using their usb 2.0 hard drives, and being put off by the speed. i'm sure
they'd be happy with faster, but insufficient to me means being to poor for use, which i don't
agree that it is for most users.

i don't think they think much about it, it just is.
__________________

Donate to TPU TeamSpeak Server

TPU TS: ts21.gameservers.com:9207

PSN / XBL / Steam = digibucc | Origin / BF3 = digibuc
digibucc is offline  
Reply With Quote