Aug 17, 2011, 06:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 5,138 (1.73/day)
Thanks: 849
Thanked 601 Times in 532 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLaughingMan
Considering the GPU part of that chip is like a $65 dedicated card, that is ridiculously cheap. And I am still not sure why all the documentation says those run at 443 MHz for the GPU core when they runn at 444 MHz. I mean its only 1 MHz difference, but why has this typo not be fixed by AMD?
|
444 is an unlucky number?
__________________
2 Servers Multiple VMs including WHS on VM, capacity 3.5 TB HDD
Family Machine - W7 Ultimate 64bit, ECS 780G, Phenom II X3 720BE @ 3.1Ghz- 1.38V, 4GB DDR2 800 ram, Sapphire 4670 512MB, 600W Ultra X pro, Xigmatek HDT-S1283
"Oh please, the only thing more resilient than an Indian is a cockroach. Not even nukes can stop their immune systems" - TheMailMan78
|
|
|