Thread: Bigger fail?
View Single Post
Old Sep 16, 2011, 07:45 PM   #60
cadaveca
My name is Dave
 
cadaveca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 10,766 (4.15/day)
Thanks: 4,472
Thanked 5,185 Times in 3,196 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by n-ster View Post
I really don't see how SB-E can be a bigger fail then BD as far as we know atm?
There was a news item recently, that's why:

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/core-i...iew-32272.html

Quote:
Though Sandy Bridge-E promises notable gains in the server world, it’s destined to be less influential on the desktop, if only because the number of folks willing to pay a steep premium for two additional cores and an otherwise-similar platform is small. Sandy Bridge spoiled us, so a high-end part just doesn't have the impact on enthusiasts that Bloomfield had back in 2008.
cadaveca is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to cadaveca For This Useful Post: