View Single Post
Old Jan 28, 2007, 05:41 AM   #17
ex_reven
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413 (1.39/day)
Thanks: 117
Thanked 181 Times in 166 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarEagleAU View Post
they are just out to rule the world I believe. I want great quality photos in lossless compression and small sizes
i seriously doubt you can have either two of those together
they might be able to make the compression more efficient
but as size decreases, quality will ALWAYS go down track in some way shape or form

Quote:
Originally Posted by prime95 View Post
or higher data transfer speeds, huge a$$ photo sizes, and larger data capacity!
Seems a like a much better albeit more expensive option. But if the technology was developed and advertised to the wider population, it could be cost effective. Especially since people can usually make use of these advantages (faster connections, faster file access) in other ways that just their photo quality.
ex_reven is offline  
Reply With Quote