MM take a better think about what you're saying... you're actually saying that people that go against a notion of law is a criminal.... this is similar to the argument many countries are using to kill their population, the part that wants something to be changed...
This stuff is kind of: "Oh, you're against law, you're a criminal and we can make whatever law we want, whatever way we want, backed up by wealthy companies that makes political lobby to defend their interests"
If downloading digital content (protected or not), is done by most of the population all over the world, and I'm quite sure it is, well.... the industry needs to find a new way to get their money or close the doors... people will pay for whatever artist they want to support, I'm quite sure about it too, just don't think all this s***t that is created daily is worth a crap and that people should be pressed to pay for it....
Digital content distribution over the net already forced some changes in the business.... or do you really think being able to buy a single track to play over your iphone instead of a full album full of shit is not a clearly consequence of that ?
Don't worry about these companies, they'll adapt, they just don't want because it's getting harder to profit with the easy old ways.... They just want to force a bigger market to accept a higher profit margins they want to make...
And all laws should protect the less economic fortunate people against greedy wealthy companies...
Think outside the box, take a different perspective, defend your rights.
Some (I mean, most), people just don't have luck to be able to buy whatever content they want for whatever price it's charged... while there are others that well... paying is not a problem for their deep pockets...
