View Single Post
Old Jan 7, 2012, 10:12 PM   #46
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega-Japan View Post
I think a couple of years back or so Wile E and I had the same discussion of 16:9 vs 16:10. You won't be changing his mind, and mine hasn't either as I still prefer 16:9.

Heck where is the 21:9 TV Vizio promised?
I can respect it just being a preference. It's just when people make blanket statement like it's universally better is when I step in. It being better or worse is mostly determined by resolution.

2560x1440 is obviously better than 1920x1200. But then, 2560x1600 would be better still, strictly in terms of abilities.

And Phillips has 21:9 TVs if you are interested. And they are 2560x1080, so much better than the current crop of 1080p tvs. I wouldn't mind having one. http://www.philips.co.uk/c/cinema-21...ONSUMER%3Dtrue
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote