View Single Post
Old Apr 2, 2012, 01:58 AM   #6
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
 
FordGT90Concept's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: IA, USA
Posts: 10,583 (6.28/day)
Thanks: 1,755
Thanked 2,601 Times in 1,963 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendor View Post
I just played this game in hd even with frap at 1280x720 res. i was getting about 21-25 fps and no real lag but when i compared this to LA Noire with average graphics. It just make the developers look unprofessional, isn't it?
I played it for 3 hrs, the gameplay is very nice, although i had this game since the release but didn't played as i was busy in other things.
But i would like to know how come Rockstar and most of the brands make such poorly coded games whereas a few are well optimized?
It's designed for slow-ass consoles. It is not optimized at all--it's hardware requirements are simply low:
http://www.pcgamer.com/2012/01/19/ma...on-on-2gb-ram/

Unlike EA, Rockstar likes to upgrade the game to make use of the hardware resources in computers. For example, Rockstar consistently makes high resolution textures available for graphics cards with a lot of VRAM.
__________________
Golden Rule of Programming: Never assume.

try { SteamDownload(); }
catch (Steamception ex) { RageQuit(); }
FordGT90Concept is online now  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote