View Single Post
Old Apr 11, 2012, 07:38 PM   #52
Aquinus
3500 Posts
 
Aquinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 4,277 (8.85/day)
Thanks: 1,284
Thanked 1,333 Times in 989 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by [H]@RD5TUFF View Post
And it will still be an underpowered lump of garbage.
It depends on how they implement the extra logical threads, we're not talking Bulldozer here. It's a completely different architecture running on a completely different processing paradigm.

I think everyone needs to stop comparing this to standard desktop CPUs unless you happen to be running a RISC processor on your tower, which I seriously doubt.

Basically it works like this.

Reasons for RISC:
• Small, heavily optimized instruction set executable in single short cycle
• All instructions same size
• No microcode = faster execution
• Extra speed more than offsets increased code size, reduced functionality
• Better compiler target

Reasons for CISC:
• Fewer instructions per task
• Shorter programs
• Hardware implementation of complex instructions faster than software
• Extra addressing modes help compiler

Source for lists since I'm lazy.
__________________
MyHeat
Aquinus is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote