Originally Posted by HTC
Is it me or is this supposed to be Unigine Heaven extreme preset benchmark instead of 3DMark 11?
Originally Posted by kingkongtol
it is HWBOT Unigine Heaven Benchmark Application score, not 3dmark x preset.
Originally Posted by SIGSEGV
that's what i called epic failed..
maybe they didnt read or maybe even click on hwbot link, so they're misinformed
I said it in post #4 (quoted above). Apparently, some dudes skipped reading a few posts in this thread and this is what happens:
Originally Posted by pioneer
zotac GTX680 WITH AIR COOLED overclocking mode exterminate
hd7970 ON ln2 cooled overclocking mode
yeh this comparison between 1425 mhz air cooled GTX680 vs 1747 mhz ln2 cooled HD7970 (-142
ZOTACís Non-Reference GeForce GTX 680 Extreme Edition graphics card has been tested in 3DMark 11 at a core clock frequency of 1420MHz on Air Cooling
And here is score
Using the ZOTAC Firestorm utility, The user managed to overclock the GPU to 1420MHz/1650MHz while the memory ran at 6.6GHz. The GPU voltage was pumped to 1.375V to obtain the desired frequency. With this much overclock, The GPU managed to score 3974 Extreme
Marks in 3DMark 11.
x3974 equal x4000 score with a air cooling getting 6% more score than LN2 cooled HD7970 with much more frequncy also with LN2 (about 22% more clock vs zotac gtx680).
i think CEO of AMD manufacture mr Rory Read may be suicide him self for this shity Scandal
It wasn't just this dude: others "fell for it" as well.