View Single Post
Old May 14, 2012, 05:41 PM   #11
RigRebel
75 Posts
 
RigRebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: In the Ether...probably eating cheetos atm.
Posts: 156 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 109
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts

System Specs

w
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkOCean View Post
Their are designed to be very profitable for them not for the consumers i doubt a corporation care about us mere mortals.
Exactly, that's what i said... they want to capture more of the market.. = mo $$$ for them and decreasing power but still at a good margin and decreasing price over AMD = Increase in sales and profits. If they can produce a cheaper product, better and at a cheaper market price than the 7800s then common economic principles apply and they should sell more.

PS this quote comes from the latest GTX 670 review from Anandtech: "Like its predecessors, GTX 670 will fill in the obligatory role as a cheaper, slower, and less power-hungry version of NVIDIA’s leading video card."
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5818/n...ew-feat-evga/1

And the GTX 660 will be even further in the less is more direction.
PSS... i was planing on $300 for a 448 core classified ultra anyways so $300 for the 660 TI will not be a boo whoo moment for me I'm sure.

PSss... May 10th has come and went so jokes on me guess OCUK was correct. bummer

Last edited by RigRebel; May 14, 2012 at 07:08 PM. Reason: Grammar and spelling checks crits 6k
RigRebel is offline  
Reply With Quote