View Single Post
Old Aug 22, 2012, 12:26 AM   #38
HumanSmoke
500 Posts
 
HumanSmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 569 (0.92/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 134 Times in 102 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
I think your overlooking the fact that AMD priced there product to performance of Nvidias GeForce 500 series
Nope. AMD priced according to competition. If buying public BELIEVED AMD offered the better choice at a respective price/performance point then AMD wouldn't need to lower prices- the FACT that AMD are lowering prices indicates that all is not well in the sales figures AMD are receiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
They have lots of room to manuever price wise and compete when Nvidia GeForce 600 series finally hits the market
Nvidia likewise have have maneuvering room. A smaller die and cheaper components at the top end, and salvage/throwaway parts in the mainstream segment. The difference is one company shaves their prices down and one stays relatively firm on pricing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
Plus didnt AMD gain 2.5% in discrete desktop segement in Q2 ?.. That would mean it did okay for going up against Nvidia Geforce GTX 690, 680 & 670.
2 + 2 = 3.1415 ?
If Nvidia only offered GTX 690/680/670 then your statement is true. The fact that they still offer Fermi and earlier based SKU's means that you can infer nothing from those individual models. If AMD gained ~2.5% against Kepler, it means that they gained ~ nothing against Fermi derivatives...kind of makes the HD 7750/7770/7850/7870 a massive flop, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
Nvidia is sitting on 40million of excess inventory with no buyers. Times are tough for both i guess.
$40m is easier to liquidate than $833m...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xzibit View Post
To put into perspective. Nvidia made a profit of 60million in Q1
Not bad for a company supposedly getting hammered by AMD in price, price/performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by N3M3515 View Post
Honestly i don't give a rats ass if amd or nvidia are premiere brands or not (there are only 2 brands ffs...) ..........whichever gives me the best perf/price is the one i pick.
I do. Premiere brand = higher average selling price = higher profit line = more $$$$ going into R&D, software support, gaming SDK's.
I don't think there is anything inferior with the hardware- I do however, feel there is something fundamentally wrong with AMD's marketing, their internal perception, and how that correlates into consumer brand awareness.

Last edited by HumanSmoke; Aug 22, 2012 at 04:58 AM. Reason: grammmar
HumanSmoke is offline  
Reply With Quote