View Single Post
Old Aug 27, 2012, 07:39 AM   #15
TheLostSwede
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: A little green island far far away
Posts: 843 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 152 Times in 113 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC37 View Post
PD will likely be what BD should have been, an actual upgrade over the Phenoms. But it still won't touch Intel.

Also consider that those cores will prolly be the same as BD. Not actual cores, just AMD's version of Hyper Threading.
Clearly you don't understand how it works then. Hyper Threading is virtual CPU cores, i.e. they're not physically inside the CPU, but it's rather the ability of one core to run multiple (two in Intel's case) threads.

AMD's route is very different, as their CPU's actually have the stated amount of cores. However, each core doesn't have a dedicated FPU and the cache is shared between the two integer processors.

Neither is ideal, but AMD clearly has a lack of FPU power and the shared cache caused some additional head ache, especially during bad predictions. But no, BD/PD is not AMD's version of Hyper Threading, instead it's AMD's attempt at adding more integer performance at the cost of FPU performance which doesn't really make sense... Now if they could do Hyper Threading on the FPU...
TheLostSwede is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TheLostSwede For This Useful Post: