View Single Post
Old Oct 8, 2012, 03:30 PM   #32
repman244
500 Posts
 
repman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 970 (1.21/day)
Thanks: 227
Thanked 413 Times in 238 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
You do understand the entire reasoning behind moving away from a monolithic core right?
Yes, and I even understand that there was nothing to improve about Phenom II (which is basically an improved K8). That is evident from Llano's CPU (32nm) side which gained almost nothing compared to Phenom II (45nm). A new design offers room for improvements.
It doesn't take away the fact that something went horribly wrong, and only time will tell if they are able to improve it (Steamroller/Excavator). Don't expect much from Piledriver since it doesn't include drastic changes in the design itself (like it's planned for Steamroller).
__________________
Storage server:
HP Proliant ML350 G4|2 x Xeon "Nocona" 3GHz|4GB DDR1 ECC|Storage (SCSI): 3x10k 72GB + 10k 300GB + 15k 300GB + Ultrium460 tape drive|Storage (SATA): Adaptec 2810SA + WD Caviar 250GB + Seagate 250GB|
Other:
HP Proliant DL380 G5|Xeon 5150|4GB FB DDR2 ECC|HP Smart Array P400-256MB cache|3x10k 146GB SAS in RAID 0 + 10k 146GB SAS|2x800W|ATi FireGL V7700|
HP Proliant DL320 G5|Xeon 3150|1GB FB DDR2 ECC|2x80GB RAID 0
repman244 is offline  
Reply With Quote