View Single Post
Old Feb 10, 2013, 11:41 AM   #52
BarbaricSoul
3500 Posts
 
BarbaricSoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southeastern Virginia
Posts: 3,738 (1.95/day)
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,084 Times in 799 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BarbaricSoul

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcpone View Post
I am going to have to clock it some what, I will need better cooling to start with before hand though. I am wishing I never went the AMD route, but hey ho, we live and learn.
How in the hell is that six core 3.5ghz cpu not handling FSX when FSX minimum requirements are-

PHP Code:
Minimum System Requirements •Windows XP SP2 / Windows Vista / Windows 7 
•Processor: 1.0 Ghz 
•RAM: Windows XP SP2 - 256MB, Windows Vista – 512MB 
•Hard Drive: 14GB 
•Video Card: 32MB DirectX 9 compatible 
•Other: DX9 hardware compatibility and audio board with speakers and/or headphones
 
•Online/Multiplayer Requirements: 56.6 kbps or better for online play 
Min specs say a 1 ghz single core cpu is sufficent. Recommeneded is going to be well under what the FX 6300 is. That is why I recommended the FX 6300 originally. I've used a FX 6100 myself, and I didn't notice a hugh difference between it and my 2600k. But then again, I see you blew a hugh chunk of your budget on a 240 gb SSD and went with a lot lower performance video card (mistake IMHO, SSDs are nice, but not worth skimping on something like the video card for). Looking at TPU's review of the GTX650, I wouldn't even consider it a gaming card. The HD7770 by AMD, which sells for about $120 gives 20% more performance. I would look at the GTX650 before assuming the CPU is the bottleneck.

__________________
“Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.”

“Amd....definitely a blond female.....not much on the cpu side, but always strutting about showing off her gpus......wow that was bad. I apologize.” -ensabrenoir

Last edited by BarbaricSoul; Feb 10, 2013 at 11:49 AM.
BarbaricSoul is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote