View Single Post
Old Jan 28, 2008, 04:50 PM   #74
rampage
500 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Port Fairy, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 801 (0.37/day)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 72 Times in 67 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BullGod View Post
Well imo this card is a total disappointment. That's why it got an 8. Are you people blind? The performance is crap. It was faster than the other cards only in old games that run at 100 fps plus. Where is the gain in that? You don't need more than 100 fps. You do need more than 30 tho. In most games that go under 100fps it was not the fastest card. So what are you really getting here?
i think this more to the point, we all know we cant expect a 100% performance increase or even a 50% increase but what we recieved was a 5% in "relative Performance", with a 19>36% performance hit in the "perfromance per watt" comparision and with prices simlar or slightly more expecive to is compition (prices taken from Australian market)

(these results are taken from W1zzards from resualts as you may have gathered)

p.s. come to think of it i dont think we will see w1zzard comming out saying well here you go, but btw its crap...... (if this is what he thinks, its only me guessing here)....
__________________
Torrent - Zotac Nano 320gb Hdd, 4 Gb, 42' plasma"
rampage is offline  
Reply With Quote