View Single Post
Old Aug 11, 2008, 04:21 AM   #20
GPUCafe
GPU Cafe Representative
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 50 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
I took the nVidia card being underclocked into account. The fact remains that we can't make a comparison based on the desktop cards, until we know more about this mGPU. There just isn't enough info.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
And the lead in that chart at 16x12 8xAA cannot be right. The 4850 gets more frames at 16x12 8xAA than it does at 16x12 4xAA. That's a bugged score if I ever saw one..\
Thats not a bugged score, you are reading it wrong. Those arent frame-rates but percentages.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
On average, the 4850 is around 20-25% faster. It's up to 50% faster at some resolutions. Unfortunately, those are at resolutions not commonly found in notebooks, so it's kind of a moot point.
1920x1200 is available in 15.4", 17" notebooks where this GPU will most likely offered. Hardly a moot point.
GPUCafe is offline  
Reply With Quote