View Single Post
Old Sep 16, 2008, 03:24 PM   #23
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
He has a 30" monitor. Every fps counts.
@2560x1600 i bet 3fps makes a difference when you only get 20fps to begin with hehe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgoth View Post
would be a waste of money to use tri sli since your cpu wil be the buttleneck
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgoth View Post
a quadcpu at 4ghz with out dated architecture
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morgoth View Post
to me its outdated since nehalem is taking its place
i'm going to answer all of yours at once

first off SHUT UP

secondly your opinions on whats a bottleneck what works and whats good are just flat out stupid @2560x1600 his cpu WONT bottleneck if you have any idea about computers you would know that the only place that a 4ghz quad is going to bottleneck is @640x480 which happens to bottleneck EVERY cpu in existence.

if you want to keep posting crap be my guest but do it on another forum cause everyone here is tired of this i love nahalem everything else is crap BS so just STFU go hide in a cave and wait for it to release and when its no were near as powerful as you expect and conroe beats it in tests i for one am going to laugh at you.

oh and to finish this off your starting to sound like some of the "smart" people in geek squad hehe

Quote:
Originally Posted by CDdude55 View Post
A QX6850 wont bottleneck(definitly not at 4Ghz). I wish i had a QX6850.
hehe me to
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cdawall For This Useful Post: