techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 4, 2008, 11:52 PM   #26
KBD
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Rotten Big Apple
Posts: 2,416 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 423
Thanked 291 Times in 273 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to KBD Send a message via AIM to KBD

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuruStud View Post
Those aren't really at stock, just FYI. No one turned off turbo, so they're actually overclocked.
Intel did this to skew benchmarking against the C2s to make i7 look really fast.
ok, fair enough. though i7s are crappy overclockers, the EE is the only one that has good potential.
KBD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 12:53 AM   #27
Wile E
Power User
 
Wile E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Western PA (Pittsburgh suburbs)
Posts: 18,129 (7.39/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 3,826 Times in 3,124 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Wile E Send a message via Yahoo to Wile E

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuruStud View Post
Those aren't really at stock, just FYI. No one turned off turbo, so they're actually overclocked.
Intel did this to skew benchmarking against the C2s to make i7 look really fast.
Most reviews that included OCing has Turbo mode disabled during OCing.

Besides, if it offers Turbo mode by default, that is still, in fact, i7's stock results. Those are the real world results offered by plopping an i7 into an X58 board without tweaking anything. That = stock in my book.
__________________

Visit Ashentech
“What the hell did you expect? Leave Vista under the pillow and the OS fairy would make it Win7?” -El Fiendo
“And Bring Mailman back god damnit, he is the Eric Cartman of TPU” -MRCL
Wile E is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 01:27 AM   #28
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,400 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wile E View Post
Most reviews that included OCing has Turbo mode disabled during OCing.

Besides, if it offers Turbo mode by default, that is still, in fact, i7's stock results. Those are the real world results offered by plopping an i7 into an X58 board without tweaking anything. That = stock in my book.
The ones I looked at had it on. The 920 was beating (once anyway) the 965 or coming close in instances (synthetic mostly, but either way, they were all upclocking).

That or either the reviews are fud.
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 01:30 AM   #29
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KBD View Post
ok, fair enough. though i7s are crappy overclockers, the EE is the only one that has good potential.
Most results actually seem to be indicating i7 will oc quite well, even the low ones. Unless AMD has pulled some kind of black magic, they are still not gonna have a shot of competing unless the prices are super duper good. They have a few good months before ddr3 starts dropping and prices of the i7 become reasonable enough for the mainstream. Hopefully they can gain some ground in the meantime.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 01:34 AM   #30
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,400 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by farlex85 View Post
Most results actually seem to be indicating i7 will oc quite well, even the low ones. Unless AMD has pulled some kind of black magic, they are still not gonna have a shot of competing unless the prices are super duper good. They have a few good months before ddr3 starts dropping and prices of the i7 become reasonable enough for the mainstream. Hopefully they can gain some ground in the meantime.
I imagine the o/c great to a point (but that might be high enough anyway), then hit a wall like the current AMD design. The cost of the CPU plus ram and MB is what (always) makes the new(er) intel stuff so unattractive.

(I will never use an intel, personal moral) but I'd still take a 9950, purely from the price standpoint (I use nvidia chipsets and those aren't cheap on the intel side).
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 01:39 AM   #31
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGuruStud View Post
I imagine the o/c great to a point (but that might be high enough anyway), then hit a wall like the current AMD design. The cost of the CPU plus ram and MB is what (always) makes the new(er) intel stuff so unattractive.

(I will never use an intel, personal moral) but I'd still take a 9950, purely from the price standpoint.
Yeah possibly, especially if the 130watt limit is true. It still remains to be seen, but there's been several people hitting 4ghz w/ the 920, and they are of course very fast clock for clock, so well, like I said it still remains to be seen for sure, but it's lookin like they are some monster.

I personally will never understand why anyone would choose a lower product based on company, unless one company was killing children or something. They both want your money, but hey, I suppose that's how these companies survive in times of need, so more power to ya. And yeah, if the price is right these may yet get my money. It's gonna need to be sub $200 offering better than upper yorkfield performance by next spring though.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:06 AM   #32
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,400 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by farlex85 View Post
Yeah possibly, especially if the 130watt limit is true. It still remains to be seen, but there's been several people hitting 4ghz w/ the 920, and they are of course very fast clock for clock, so well, like I said it still remains to be seen for sure, but it's lookin like they are some monster.

I personally will never understand why anyone would choose a lower product based on company, unless one company was killing children or something. They both want your money, but hey, I suppose that's how these companies survive in times of need, so more power to ya. And yeah, if the price is right these may yet get my money. It's gonna need to be sub $200 offering better than upper yorkfield performance by next spring though.
Business practices (all the lying, cheating, etc), plus what they do to people (their overseas slaves, i mean workers) Stomping on defenseless ppl pisses me off.

It's one of the rare products where you can just say no completely.
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:31 AM   #33
KBD
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Rotten Big Apple
Posts: 2,416 (1.05/day)
Thanks: 423
Thanked 291 Times in 273 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to KBD Send a message via AIM to KBD

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by farlex85 View Post
Most results actually seem to be indicating i7 will oc quite well, even the low ones. Unless AMD has pulled some kind of black magic, they are still not gonna have a shot of competing unless the prices are super duper good. They have a few good months before ddr3 starts dropping and prices of the i7 become reasonable enough for the mainstream. Hopefully they can gain some ground in the meantime.
it aint gonna happen, AMD already announced their plans for the near future and no black magic is scheduled. The Deneb will be a good chip but not good enough to compete with Corei7 which dont overclock that well (except for 965 EE), BTW. Reviews i read were mixed: some people couldnt get them to overclock some had some success. Granted, this is a new, unmature platform and we may yet see better overclocks but i suspect that we will not see the overclocks C2D produced. IMC + Quad Core = not very overclockable.
KBD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:39 AM   #34
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by KBD View Post
it aint gonna happen, AMD already announced their plans for the near future and no black magic is scheduled. The Deneb will be a good chip but not good enough to compete with Corei7 which dont overclock that well (except for 965 EE), BTW. Reviews i read were mixed: some people couldnt get them to overclock some had some success. Granted, this is a new, unmature platform and we may yet see better overclocks but i suspect that we will not see the overclocks C2D produced. IMC + Quad Core = not very overclockable.
As I said, people are getting the 920 to 4ghz, and I haven't seen any official reviews oc'ing that one. Considering how much faster than C2D they are clock for clock, I'd say they oc quite well. Although, we still wont know for sure for a bit.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:47 AM   #35
OzzmanFloyd120
2000 Posts
 
OzzmanFloyd120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pontaic Michigan
Posts: 2,150 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 177
Thanked 305 Times in 270 Posts
Send a message via MSN to OzzmanFloyd120

System Specs

I know I'm just as much to blame as everyone else, but there's alot of rumor and opinion being thrown around this thread. Truth be told we won't see which is faster until both chips are released and someone credible does a clock vs clock review of the two designs.
OzzmanFloyd120 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:52 AM   #36
PCpraiser100
1000 Posts
 
PCpraiser100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,059 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 68 Times in 61 Posts

System Specs

The last rumor I saw about Deneb was a sample being OC'd to 4.3GHz with the help of a Scythe Mine cooler, and a 790GX mobo. Pretty damn impressive when AMD has very high memory bandwidth, bit of a shame that there were no benchmarks. But, now that Intel has already shown off their hand of cards, its now AMD's turn to do the same or stocks will fall.

Last edited by PCpraiser100; Nov 5, 2008 at 03:01 AM.
PCpraiser100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:53 AM   #37
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.81/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzmanFloyd120 View Post
I know I'm just as much to blame as everyone else, but there's alot of rumor and opinion being thrown around this thread. Truth be told we won't see which is faster until both chips are released and someone credible does a clock vs clock review of the two designs.
Well of course, that doesn't mean we can't speculate though. That's half the fun.
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 02:56 AM   #38
OzzmanFloyd120
2000 Posts
 
OzzmanFloyd120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pontaic Michigan
Posts: 2,150 (1.13/day)
Thanks: 177
Thanked 305 Times in 270 Posts
Send a message via MSN to OzzmanFloyd120

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by farlex85 View Post
Well of course, that doesn't mean we can't speculate though. That's half the fun.
Touche good sir!
But I was just thinking about it at work today and we're arguing over performance of parts that we can't even buy yet. I just hope that I can get a Deneb in my machine and OC it to 3.5GHZ+ 100% stable. I would love to be able to render in real time when I'm working in Vegas instead of having to render to my ram all of the damn time.
OzzmanFloyd120 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2008, 05:35 PM   #39
Fragman
25 Posts
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denmark EU
Posts: 57 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts

Me want the 3GHz Phenom X4 20550 now i say

Hope AMD dosent go under enytime soon...
__________________
Fragman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official M3A32-MVP Deluxe and Phenom Overclocking Guide Psychlone Overclocking & Cooling 93 Oct 16, 2010 12:31 AM
Phenom 9850BE low voltage overclocking results! Kei Overclocking & Cooling 5508 Apr 21, 2009 10:40 PM
Overclocking- The basics Dippyskoodlez Articles 31 Jan 15, 2009 01:32 AM
Need Help Overclocking Ram And Cpu berwick53 Overclocking & Cooling 3 Apr 19, 2008 04:48 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts