techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 17, 2008, 06:11 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,896 Times in 5,648 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

USB 3.0 Specification Now Available

The USB 3.0 Promoter Group today announced the completion of the USB 3.0 specification, the technical map for device manufacturers to deliver SuperSpeed USB technology to the market.

SuperSpeed USB brings significant power and performance enhancements to the popular USB standard while offering backward compatibility with billions of USB-enabled PCs and peripheral devices currently in use by consumers. Delivering data transfer rates up to ten times faster than Hi-Speed USB (USB 2.0) with optimized power efficiency, SuperSpeed USB is the next step in the continued evolution of USB technology.

“SuperSpeed USB is the next advancement in ubiquitous technology,” said Jeff Ravencraft, USB-IF president and chairman. “Today’s consumers are using rich media and large digital files that need to be easily and quickly transferred from PCs to devices and vice versa. SuperSpeed USB meets the needs of everyone from the tech-savvy executive to the average home user.”

The USB 3.0 Promoter Group, comprised of Hewlett-Packard Company, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NEC Corporation, ST-NXP Wireless and Texas Instruments, developed the USB 3.0 specification. The group now has transitioned the specification’s management to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), the managing body of USB specifications. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group is now accepting adopters of the USB 3.0 specification, which has been finalized at the 1.0 level. To download both the specification and adopter agreement, visit http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/.

It is anticipated that initial SuperSpeed USB discrete controllers will appear in the second half of 2009 and consumer products will appear in 2010, with adoption continuing throughout 2010. The first SuperSpeed USB devices will likely include data-storage devices such as flash drives, external hard drives, digital music players and digital cameras.

The USB 3.0 specification debuted today in conjunction with the first SuperSpeed USB Developers Conference in San Jose, California. The conference provides attendees the first opportunity to hear directly from the creators of the USB 3.0 specification; keynote speakers will address advancements offered by the new technology. In addition to technical sessions, an exhibit area will showcase the latest developments and early designs featuring SuperSpeed USB technology. Attendees will obtain information on the best practices for incorporating SuperSpeed USB into their product roadmaps.

The USB 3.0 specification includes many advancements for both consumers and adopters, including higher speeds and enhanced power efficiency. For more information about the USB 3.0 specification, visit http://www.usb.org/developers.

Source: Business Wire
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 17, 2008, 06:52 PM   #2
csendesmark
200 Posts
 
csendesmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU/Hungary
Posts: 330 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Send a message via MSN to csendesmark Send a message via Skype™ to csendesmark

System Specs

Fine

My opinion: USB is the best invention in IT
and I waiting for it
__________________
Core i7 950 @ 4,2GHz | Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME | 3 × 2GB DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Radeon HD 6970-2048 | Corsair TX750 | Sabayon Linux | Opera | TeamFortress 2 | Left 4 Dead 2 | StarCraft 2 | $11€
TECH-POWER-UP
csendesmark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 06:56 PM   #3
EarlZ
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 228 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts

System Specs

So this is like how many MB's of sustained real world data transfer on 3.0 ?
EarlZ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:15 PM   #4
DaC
500 Posts
 
DaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DaC Send a message via MSN to DaC Send a message via Yahoo to DaC Send a message via Skype™ to DaC

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlZ View Post
So this is like how many MB's of sustained real world data transfer on 3.0 ?
good question...... usb 2.0 bus is 480mbps..... usb 3.0 is 5gbps.....
I really don't think it will change much from what we have now.....
DaC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:16 PM   #5
lucasweir
1000 Posts
 
lucasweir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oakland County, MI
Posts: 1,161 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 71 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by btarunr View Post
Delivering data transfer rates up to ten times faster than Hi-Speed USB (USB 2.0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlZ View Post
So this is like how many MB's of sustained real world data transfer on 3.0 ?
yea thats what i was wondering?

60 MByte/s USB 2.0 X 10 = 600 MB/s

600 Mb/s damn
__________________
Old CASE mOD HEATWARE

Last edited by lucasweir; Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46 PM.
lucasweir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:24 PM   #6
KBD
2000 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Rotten Big Apple
Posts: 2,416 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 423
Thanked 291 Times in 273 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to KBD Send a message via AIM to KBD

System Specs

so this USB 3 is even faster than eSATA it turns out?? I just dont know if we'll actually see 5gb/s speeds in reality.

Another question comes to mind, if Intel is one of the developers you guys think they will license USB 3 to others like AMD and Nvidia for their boards or no?

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucasweir View Post
yea thats what i was wondering?

60 MByte/s USB 2.0 X 10 = 1800 MB/s

1.8 GB/s damn
if i'm not mistaken its around 600MB/s, actually 625 to be precise. 60 x 10 = 600MB/s, not sure where 1,800 came from, unless i'm missing something.
KBD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:33 PM   #7
DaC
500 Posts
 
DaC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DaC Send a message via MSN to DaC Send a message via Yahoo to DaC Send a message via Skype™ to DaC

System Specs

Is there a USB 2.0 device that can do 60MByte/s sustained ? I thought fasters usb 2.0 device were around 30-40 MByte/s
DaC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:37 PM   #8
kakazza
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 470 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucasweir View Post
60 MByte/s USB 2.0 X 10 = 1800 MB/s
1.8 GB/s damn
lol
kakazza is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:48 PM   #9
mlee49
Eligible for custom title
 
mlee49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,919 (3.51/day)
Thanks: 1,597
Thanked 2,044 Times in 1,600 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to mlee49

System Specs

Its about time.

We should be seeing PCI-E 3.0 in 09 as well.

edit: Seeing news about pci-e in 09, seeing devices early 2010.
__________________

Last edited by mlee49; Nov 17, 2008 at 09:21 PM.
mlee49 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:55 PM   #10
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,799 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 529
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlZ View Post
So this is like how many MB's of sustained real world data transfer on 3.0 ?
Transfer of a 25GB HD movie:

* USB 1.0: 9.3 hours
* USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes
* USB 3.0: 70 seconds
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 07:59 PM   #11
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaC View Post
Is there a USB 2.0 device that can do 60MByte/s sustained ? I thought fasters usb 2.0 device were around 30-40 MByte/s
It is around 35 on average. USB2.0 is 480mb, not 600mb

60 x10 = 600, not 60 x10 x usb2.0
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 08:25 PM   #12
Swansen
75 Posts
 
Swansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 180 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlee49 View Post
Its about time.

We should be seeing PCI-E 3.0 in 09 as well.
Not to get off track here, but there is hardly a point for PCIe 2.0, as far as bandwidth usage goes. USB 3.0 is going to be the coolest thing since they invented cheese.
USB 2.0 = Hi-speed USB
USB 3.0 = SS USB ?????
Swansen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 08:32 PM   #13
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

i still call BS on all of the numbers by tech spec USB2.0 is faster than firewire while in the real world firewire blows it out of the water

if its still a burst protocol it can have all the bandwidth it wants but it will make no difference
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 08:40 PM   #14
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

FireWire 400 is dead.

FireWire in general is not that common, sure its faster, but I dont see any one make FireFire Thumb drives. Majority of devices use USB interface.
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 08:46 PM   #15
lucasweir
1000 Posts
 
lucasweir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oakland County, MI
Posts: 1,161 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 71 Times in 65 Posts

System Specs

yea my bad not to good at math
__________________
Old CASE mOD HEATWARE
lucasweir is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 09:03 PM   #16
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
FireWire 400 is dead.

FireWire in general is not that common, sure its faster, but I dont see any one make FireFire Thumb drives. Majority of devices use USB interface.
firewire does not provide power like USB does hence you will never see firewire thumb drives
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 09:05 PM   #17
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
 
InnocentCriminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucasweir View Post
yea my bad not to good at math
Is that with or without a calculator?
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter.
During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you."
InnocentCriminal is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 09:54 PM   #18
aj28
200 Posts
 
aj28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 352 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
firewire does not provide power like USB does hence you will never see firewire thumb drives
Sorry, but that's not correct... 500mA/5V is the maximum output for USB 2.0, while firewire can do 1.25A/12V. The big issue with firewire thumb drives as I see it is the availability of the interface and the price of controllers...
aj28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aj28 For This Useful Post:
Old Nov 17, 2008, 10:05 PM   #19
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.81/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

The speed sounds very good. I hope this actually goes better than my USB 1.1 to 2.0 transition (in which I fried all my 1.1 stuff)
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 10:20 PM   #20
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVTCaboose1337 View Post
The speed sounds very good. I hope this actually goes better than my USB 1.1 to 2.0 transition (in which I fried all my 1.1 stuff)

so you gona try all your 1.1 stuff with 3.0? ...hehe
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 10:49 PM   #21
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by aj28 View Post
Sorry, but that's not correct... 500mA/5V is the maximum output for USB 2.0, while firewire can do 1.25A/12V. The big issue with firewire thumb drives as I see it is the availability of the interface and the price of controllers...
i didnt know that thanks for the info
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 17, 2008, 11:06 PM   #22
Steevo
Eligible for custom title
 
Steevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,567 (2.02/day)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 979 Times in 729 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
i still call BS on all of the numbers by tech spec USB2.0 is faster than firewire while in the real world firewire blows it out of the water

if its still a burst protocol it can have all the bandwidth it wants but it will make no difference
Holla.



Protocol overhead makes USB fail.
__________________

“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17
“yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
Steevo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2008, 12:01 AM   #23
Easy Rhino
Linux Advocate
 
Easy Rhino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts

System Specs

i hate when companies and organization start naming things like "high speed" and "super speed." what is next, "super awesome speed?" or "super duper USB scooper?"
Easy Rhino is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2008, 12:12 AM   #24
TheGuruStud
1000 Posts
 
TheGuruStud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,394 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts

System Specs

USB 2 tops out at like 25 MB/s sustained (bursts are faster, but that's useless for HDDs). Suffice to say, USB 3 will also suffer the perf penalties of the design.
__________________
TheGuruStud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2008, 12:26 AM   #25
Mussels
Doctor Moderator
 
Mussels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,548 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,688 Times in 6,389 Posts

System Specs

Theres two sized firewire plugs. the larger of which, does provide power.

While USB 2.0's theoretical speed is 60MB/s, its one of those stupid speeds where they measure both ways at once. You can only get 30MB/s maximum (give or take 2-3MB/s) in any one direction.

USB 3.0 will be the same - capping out at 300MB/s maximum. Great to have some headroom, but no faster than SATA-II... so hey, it sounds great for this generation of external drives.
Mussels is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Unveils Extensible Host Controller Interface Draft Spec to Support USB 3.0 alexp999 News 1 Aug 14, 2008 08:27 AM
Intel Dispelling the USB 3.0 Myths malware News 8 Jun 13, 2008 03:10 AM
NVIDIA and AMD Vie with Intel Over USB 3.0 malware News 43 Jun 10, 2008 03:30 AM
Random Restars - > Video Card - > PSU TrAiN^WrEcK General Hardware 37 May 8, 2007 02:05 PM
having problems with cod 2 MATTB25 Games 12 Jul 19, 2006 01:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts