![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,981 (7.31/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,896 Times in 5,648 Posts
|
USB 3.0 Specification Now Available
The USB 3.0 Promoter Group today announced the completion of the USB 3.0 specification, the technical map for device manufacturers to deliver SuperSpeed USB technology to the market.
SuperSpeed USB brings significant power and performance enhancements to the popular USB standard while offering backward compatibility with billions of USB-enabled PCs and peripheral devices currently in use by consumers. Delivering data transfer rates up to ten times faster than Hi-Speed USB (USB 2.0) with optimized power efficiency, SuperSpeed USB is the next step in the continued evolution of USB technology. “SuperSpeed USB is the next advancement in ubiquitous technology,” said Jeff Ravencraft, USB-IF president and chairman. “Today’s consumers are using rich media and large digital files that need to be easily and quickly transferred from PCs to devices and vice versa. SuperSpeed USB meets the needs of everyone from the tech-savvy executive to the average home user.” The USB 3.0 Promoter Group, comprised of Hewlett-Packard Company, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, NEC Corporation, ST-NXP Wireless and Texas Instruments, developed the USB 3.0 specification. The group now has transitioned the specification’s management to the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF), the managing body of USB specifications. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group is now accepting adopters of the USB 3.0 specification, which has been finalized at the 1.0 level. To download both the specification and adopter agreement, visit http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/. It is anticipated that initial SuperSpeed USB discrete controllers will appear in the second half of 2009 and consumer products will appear in 2010, with adoption continuing throughout 2010. The first SuperSpeed USB devices will likely include data-storage devices such as flash drives, external hard drives, digital music players and digital cameras. The USB 3.0 specification debuted today in conjunction with the first SuperSpeed USB Developers Conference in San Jose, California. The conference provides attendees the first opportunity to hear directly from the creators of the USB 3.0 specification; keynote speakers will address advancements offered by the new technology. In addition to technical sessions, an exhibit area will showcase the latest developments and early designs featuring SuperSpeed USB technology. Attendees will obtain information on the best practices for incorporating SuperSpeed USB into their product roadmaps. The USB 3.0 specification includes many advancements for both consumers and adopters, including higher speeds and enhanced power efficiency. For more information about the USB 3.0 specification, visit http://www.usb.org/developers. Source: Business Wire |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to btarunr For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU/Hungary
Posts: 330 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
|
Fine
![]() My opinion: USB is the best invention in IT ![]() and I waiting for it
__________________
Core i7 950 @ 4,2GHz | Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME | 3 × 2GB DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Radeon HD 6970-2048 | Corsair TX750 | Sabayon Linux | Opera | TeamFortress 2 | Left 4 Dead 2 | StarCraft 2 | $1 ≠ 1€
TECH-POWER-UP |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() |
So this is like how many MB's of sustained real world data transfer on 3.0 ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oakland County, MI
Posts: 1,161 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 71 Times in 65 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
60 MByte/s USB 2.0 X 10 = 600 MB/s 600 Mb/s damn Last edited by lucasweir; Nov 17, 2008 at 08:46 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Rotten Big Apple
Posts: 2,416 (1.06/day)
Thanks: 423
Thanked 291 Times in 273 Posts
|
so this USB 3 is even faster than eSATA it turns out?? I just dont know if we'll actually see 5gb/s speeds in reality.
Another question comes to mind, if Intel is one of the developers you guys think they will license USB 3 to others like AMD and Nvidia for their boards or no? if i'm not mistaken its around 600MB/s, actually 625 to be precise. 60 x 10 = 600MB/s, not sure where 1,800 came from, unless i'm missing something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: São Paulo - SP - Brasil
Posts: 591 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 65 Times in 57 Posts
|
Is there a USB 2.0 device that can do 60MByte/s sustained ? I thought fasters usb 2.0 device were around 30-40 MByte/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 470 (0.19/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: KU
Posts: 6,919 (3.51/day)
Thanks: 1,597
Thanked 2,044 Times in 1,600 Posts
|
Its about time.
We should be seeing PCI-E 3.0 in 09 as well. edit: Seeing news about pci-e in 09, seeing devices early 2010.
__________________
Last edited by mlee49; Nov 17, 2008 at 09:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,799 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 529
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts
|
Quote:
* USB 1.0: 9.3 hours * USB 2.0: 13.9 minutes * USB 3.0: 70 seconds
__________________
![]() “Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 180 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
Not to get off track here, but there is hardly a point for PCIe 2.0, as far as bandwidth usage goes. USB 3.0 is going to be the coolest thing since they invented cheese.
USB 2.0 = Hi-speed USB USB 3.0 = SS USB ????? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
i still call BS on all of the numbers by tech spec USB2.0 is faster than firewire while in the real world firewire blows it out of the water
if its still a burst protocol it can have all the bandwidth it wants but it will make no difference
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
FireWire 400 is dead.
FireWire in general is not that common, sure its faster, but I dont see any one make FireFire Thumb drives. Majority of devices use USB interface. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Oakland County, MI
Posts: 1,161 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 55
Thanked 71 Times in 65 Posts
|
yea my bad not to good at math
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
firewire does not provide power like USB does hence you will never see firewire thumb drives
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Resident Grammar Amender
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'ereyfurd, UK
Posts: 5,471 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 198
Thanked 855 Times in 667 Posts
|
Is that with or without a calculator?
__________________
Post count isn't an intelligence meter. During the rectification of the Vuldronaii the Traveler came as a large, moving Torb. Then, during the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants they chose a new form for him—that of a giant Sloar! Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.
Musek: "InnocentCriminal - a Chuck Norris of the TPU - knows what you are about to type and he WILL type it faster than you." |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() |
Sorry, but that's not correct... 500mA/5V is the maximum output for USB 2.0, while firewire can do 1.25A/12V. The big issue with firewire thumb drives as I see it is the availability of the interface and the price of controllers...
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to aj28 For This Useful Post: |
|
|
#19 |
|
Graphical Hacker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.81/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts
|
The speed sounds very good. I hope this actually goes better than my USB 1.1 to 2.0 transition (in which I fried all my 1.1 stuff)
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
where the hell are my stars
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.43/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
|
i didnt know that thanks for the info
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
Quote:
Protocol overhead makes USB fail.
__________________
“it would have been perfect....its got trains and the line"tech your kids not to do what iv done"(or similar) because i had obviously done something to warrent 2 e-thugs to come 4000miles out of their way and kill me.” -Solaris17 “yeah i failed. i noticed the "coming soon" part after i posted.” -Mussels
“people are just stupid.” -W1zzard
Yes I am evil, yes you can have some.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Linux Advocate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,218 (4.29/day)
Thanks: 1,206
Thanked 2,774 Times in 1,792 Posts
|
i hate when companies and organization start naming things like "high speed" and "super speed." what is next, "super awesome speed?" or "super duper USB scooper?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Police/Nanny State of America
Posts: 1,394 (0.67/day)
Thanks: 45
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts
|
USB 2 tops out at like 25 MB/s sustained (bursts are faster, but that's useless for HDDs). Suffice to say, USB 3 will also suffer the perf penalties of the design.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Doctor Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bendigo, Australia (NOT THE USA)
Posts: 34,548 (10.97/day)
Thanks: 3,699
Thanked 8,688 Times in 6,389 Posts
|
Theres two sized firewire plugs. the larger of which, does provide power.
While USB 2.0's theoretical speed is 60MB/s, its one of those stupid speeds where they measure both ways at once. You can only get 30MB/s maximum (give or take 2-3MB/s) in any one direction. USB 3.0 will be the same - capping out at 300MB/s maximum. Great to have some headroom, but no faster than SATA-II... so hey, it sounds great for this generation of external drives.
__________________
![]() Edumacational thread about PC Audio My external HDD's.5x samsung 1TB + 2x Seagate 1.5TB = 8 TB external storage 32 Bit OS vs 64 bit OS information How to get hardware accelerated H264 playback (DXVA) Netbook Owners United! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Unveils Extensible Host Controller Interface Draft Spec to Support USB 3.0 | alexp999 | News | 1 | Aug 14, 2008 08:27 AM |
| Intel Dispelling the USB 3.0 Myths | malware | News | 8 | Jun 13, 2008 03:10 AM |
| NVIDIA and AMD Vie with Intel Over USB 3.0 | malware | News | 43 | Jun 10, 2008 03:30 AM |
| Random Restars - > Video Card - > PSU | TrAiN^WrEcK | General Hardware | 37 | May 8, 2007 02:05 PM |
| having problems with cod 2 | MATTB25 | Games | 12 | Jul 19, 2006 01:45 PM |