techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Dec 10, 2008, 07:08 AM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Spotted

VR-Zone scored the first photo of the upcoming GeForce GTX 295 card that's reported to make first appearance at next year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES). Unlike previous reports, the card will feature a sandwich design, like most dual GPU cards released by NVIDIA. Two 55nm GT200 CPUs will be incorporated in this card. From the picture we also see two DVI and one Display ports. The source also reports the card is using 8+6 pin connector combo to deliver external power. The pricing is yet to be disclosed, but card makers are speculating that NVIDIA will price it competitively against AMD 4870X2.



Source: VR-Zone
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 07:12 AM   #2
Fitseries3
Eleet Hardware Junkie
 
Fitseries3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 14,993 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 3,285 Times in 2,186 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to Fitseries3

System Specs

no word on SLI support?
Fitseries3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 07:16 AM   #3
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.55/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

That just makes my day worse... That card looks like poo. I hope they iron out the aesthetics before release.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 07:20 AM   #4
Error 404
1000 Posts
 
Error 404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Australia
Posts: 1,330 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 178 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Error 404

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
That just makes my day worse... That card looks like poo. I hope they iron out the aesthetics before release.
Of course it looks awful, its a pre-release work-in-progress. I think. (I hope)
Its basically like the 9800 GX2 but without the metal cover, and much more power!
__________________
Third rig: PC Express Invader. C2D E6400 2.13GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, 320GB HDD, Intel 945, Asus 9600GT 512MB, 550W PSU, W7 HP 64-bit.
Fourth Rig: Dell Optiplex 170L, P4 Prescott 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR266RAM, 80GB HDD, FX5200PCI 128MB, 250W PSU,XP Pro
Fifth rig (Laptop): Dell Inspiron 4000, 14.1", PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 9.3GB, XP Pro. Now with passive cooling!

“I could make a better looking computer case with a bucket of Lincoln Logs.” -lemode
Error 404 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 07:35 AM   #5
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.55/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

But it looks like it will have less power than 2xGTX 260
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 08:32 AM   #6
GFC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a (0/day)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
But it looks like it will have less power than 2xGTX 260
How can it have less power ? It's built on 55nm process, unless they down-clock it because of the heat - it's going to be faster.
The main concern for me is, why the hell did they use dual-PCB setup like last time? Because of that, there's barely any place for the fan, which means it's going to be a really hot card.
 
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:00 AM   #7
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

I don't know what makes you think it will draw more power than the 9800 GX2, they have both the same 6-pin + 8-pin conectors.

I don't know why it would be really hot neither. The single PCB design of the HD3870 X2 didn't help out too much, the GX2 was cooler and quieter and indeed the temps were about the same as in single 9800s. Everything else were memes created long before the card even launched that continued existing thanks to the internets pop culture.

Rememer it's 55nm GT200 being used, we don't know anything about it yet. I say it's going to draw less power than the HD4870 X2 and have lower temps. Specilating like anyone else of course.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:07 AM   #8
Error 404
1000 Posts
 
Error 404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Australia
Posts: 1,330 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 178 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Error 404

System Specs

Yeah, the GX2 uses exactly the same setup as this dual-PCB card, and considering how powerful the GX2 is it should be interesting to see how well this performs.
The real question will be whether this supports Tri-SLI: 6 cores of POWAH!
__________________
Third rig: PC Express Invader. C2D E6400 2.13GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, 320GB HDD, Intel 945, Asus 9600GT 512MB, 550W PSU, W7 HP 64-bit.
Fourth Rig: Dell Optiplex 170L, P4 Prescott 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR266RAM, 80GB HDD, FX5200PCI 128MB, 250W PSU,XP Pro
Fifth rig (Laptop): Dell Inspiron 4000, 14.1", PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 9.3GB, XP Pro. Now with passive cooling!

“I could make a better looking computer case with a bucket of Lincoln Logs.” -lemode
Error 404 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:09 AM   #9
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Error 404 View Post
Yeah, the GX2 uses exactly the same setup as this dual-PCB card, and considering how powerful the GX2 is it should be interesting to see how well this performs.
The real question will be whether this supports Tri-SLI: 6 cores of POWAH!
I can almost answr that for you already. NO.

Just a speculation based on past communicates, but according to what I said IIRC, nothing more than Quad SLI will be ever supported. Never say never, but...
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:09 AM   #10
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.55/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by GFC View Post
How can it have less power ? It's built on 55nm process, unless they down-clock it because of the heat - it's going to be faster.
The main concern for me is, why the hell did they use dual-PCB setup like last time? Because of that, there's barely any place for the fan, which means it's going to be a really hot card.
You forget that they are selling the GTX260 as 55nm as well, so 2x GTX260 will be faster than this dual card solution. Just look at 2x4870 vs 4870x2.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:13 AM   #11
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
Just look at 2x4870 vs 4870x2.
I wouldn't draw up any conclusions based on that. Different architectures and last I checked GTX260 SLI is slightly faster than 2xHD4870, while at the same time a GTX260 is slower when alone. It's too soon to conclude anything IMO.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkMatter For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:25 AM   #12
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsið mitt
Posts: 2,606 (1.33/day)
Thanks: 479
Thanked 356 Times in 265 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
But it looks like it will have less power than 2xGTX 260
Doubt it. Its a 55nm 260 with 448bit memory bandwidth on each, and a full 240 shader units on each core. Kinda like 2 beefed up 260.

Source:
http://en.expreview.com/2008/12/09/g...in-ces-09.html

Reason for it was obvious.. they wanted to outperform 4870x2 for a competitive price point. No sense in releasing a card that has the same performance as 2x GTX260 216s since 2x GTX 260 216s is more or less equivalent (averaging) vs a 4870x2.
__________________

SIEG HEIL!!

Last edited by Bjorn_Of_Iceland; Dec 10, 2008 at 09:33 AM.
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:33 AM   #13
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Of_Iceland View Post
Doubt it. Its a 55nm 260 with 448bit memory bandwidth on each, and a full 240 shader units on each core. Kinda like 2 beefed up 260.

Source:
http://www.firingsquad.com/news/news...searchid=21080
Interesting! Yeah, definately interesting. It makes me happy when companies decide to make the things I think are the best option, and it's common sense TBH, is not that I have bright ideas. You definately don't need 1024 bits interface, even in 2x512 bits config, neither you need 64 ROPs churning out pixels like mad and this way you have much less routing on the PCBs. In my view the cards should have 2x384 bits and 1.5 GB of memory, enough IMO to have stellar performance on a cheaper config.

Quote:
Reason for it was obvious.. they wanted to outperform 4870x2 for a competitive price point. No sense in releasing a card that has the same performance as 2x GTX260 216s since 2x GTX 260 216s is more or less equivalent (averaging) vs a 4870x2.
EH? Last time I saw a comparison 2x260 were significanty faster than an X2, by a fair ammount, in fact, prior to 180.xx drivers that improved SLI a lot. 240 shaders can only improve upon that, IF the hypothetical 216SP 295 was to perform like 2x260, of course.

IMO if that ends up being true, they did it just because they have learnt half the way that they simply can. Maybe they had many chips with faulty ROPs, but intact SP cores (considering that they moved to GTX260 216 it makes sense*), that had to go to GTX260 cards, but now they decided this. They will never try to slightly win over Ati cards anymore. IMO They learnt the lesson and won't commit the same errors at least in a while...

* Explanation to profanes: GT200 has 8 raster processors with 4 "ROPs" and 64 bit memory controler each, for a total 32 ROPS and 512bit, it also has 10 SP/TMU clusters with 24 SP each for a total of 240. In order to improve yields, if one of the clusters fails they use that chip for the lesser card, the GTX260. Right now Nvidia has to sell as GTX260 216 ANY card that has either a defective ROP cluster or a SP cluster, but not necessarily both at the same time. With this move they can use those with only 1 faulty raster processor, which by pure statistics can be more than the ones with 1 SP cluster disabled. WIN WIN.

Last edited by DarkMatter; Dec 10, 2008 at 09:54 AM.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:48 AM   #14
Bjorn_Of_Iceland
2000 Posts
 
Bjorn_Of_Iceland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Húsið mitt
Posts: 2,606 (1.33/day)
Thanks: 479
Thanked 356 Times in 265 Posts

System Specs

kinda like that hare and turtle race eh hehe.

Quote:
EH? Last time I saw a comparison 2x260 were significanty faster than an X2, by a fair ammount, in fact, prior to 180.xx drivers that improved SLI a lot. 240 shaders can only improve upon that, IF the hypothetical 216SP 295 was to perform like 2x260, of course.
plus minus actually.. some games lean more on the 4870x2 and some on the GTX260 SLI.
__________________

SIEG HEIL!!
Bjorn_Of_Iceland is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:56 AM   #15
human_error
1000 Posts
 
human_error's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 1,443 (0.87/day)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 421 Times in 322 Posts

System Specs

is it me or does the picture look like it's 3 slots wide?
(there is enough space between the displayport and the dual dvi ports for a single slot sized grill for heat output).

If so we'll be needing new BFG ultra full towers FTW for the new GTXATX motherboard size spec to be able to run SLI
__________________
Steam id: human_error/XBOX Live: human error/PS3 id: tom_will
Human_error's guide to USB IR receivers and media center remotes
My BF3 stats | BF3 name: "human_error" - add me!
human_error is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 09:59 AM   #16
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.55/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkMatter View Post
I wouldn't draw up any conclusions based on that. Different architectures and last I checked GTX260 SLI is slightly faster than 2xHD4870, while at the same time a GTX260 is slower when alone. It's too soon to conclude anything IMO.
Tell that to dark2099

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn_Of_Iceland View Post
Doubt it. Its a 55nm 260 with 448bit memory bandwidth on each, and a full 240 shader units on each core. Kinda like 2 beefed up 260.

Source:
http://en.expreview.com/2008/12/09/g...in-ces-09.html

Reason for it was obvious.. they wanted to outperform 4870x2 for a competitive price point. No sense in releasing a card that has the same performance as 2x GTX260 216s since 2x GTX 260 216s is more or less equivalent (averaging) vs a 4870x2.
And then why is it that Tatty's 260 that had a soft-volt mod owns any GTX280 under the sun? The GTX200 series is more or less bogged down by shader cores... it never needed more than say 192 or 216.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 10:10 AM   #17
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
Tell that to dark2099
WoOt? I don't get it.

Quote:
And then why is it that Tatty's 260 that had a soft-volt mod owns any GTX280 under the sun? The GTX200 series is more or less bogged down by shader cores... it never needed more than say 192 or 216.
You can't dismiss the fact that GTX260 216 is faster than GTX260 192...

And almost by the same percentage as SP increase for more signs.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 10:47 AM   #18
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

SHOCK HORROR

This is a twin PCB GPU on one slot. It's practically an SLI pre-prepared for one socket.

They DIDNT MANAGE to get two 206b GPU's onto one PCB. Shame.
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 10:51 AM   #19
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
SHOCK HORROR

This is a twin PCB GPU on one slot. It's practically an SLI pre-prepared for one socket.

They DIDNT MANAGE to get two 206b GPU's onto one PCB. Shame.
O my god. Are we going to return to the same debate once again??
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DarkMatter For This Useful Post:
Old Dec 10, 2008, 10:56 AM   #20
HossHuge
1000 Posts
 
HossHuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 1,809 (1.01/day)
Thanks: 513
Thanked 448 Times in 301 Posts

System Specs

I hope it does beat a 4870x2 so maybe they will drop the price!!
HossHuge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 11:11 AM   #21
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

look at his picture is that a 3rd PCB? and i found the quad SLi connector they just dont have it as a plug on the PCB yet

__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 11:16 AM   #22
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall View Post
look at his picture is that a 3rd PCB? and i found the quad SLi connector they just dont have it as a plug on the PCB yet
Good call. Although I think it's just a little piece, not an entire PCB. IMO it's a dual slot card, it might be the perspective but I don't see enough space between the PCBs for it being 3-slot and I certainly don't see anything between them.

And don't get offense, but I'd think everybody had seen the connector already.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 11:18 AM   #23
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
 
cdawall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: some AF base
Posts: 16,021 (6.42/day)
Thanks: 457
Thanked 2,753 Times in 2,222 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cdawall Send a message via Yahoo to cdawall Send a message via Skype™ to cdawall

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkMatter View Post
Good call. Although I think it's just a little piece, not an entire PCB. IMO it's a dual slot card, it might be the perspective but I don't see enough space between the PCBs for it being 3-slot and I certainly don't see anything between them.

And don't get offense, but I'd think everybody had seen the connector already.
i would think so to but check towards the top someone asks about sli
__________________
cdawall is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 11:24 AM   #24
zOaib
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 949 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 136
Thanked 35 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

more sandwich , wooot ..... jesus christ !!!!!
__________________
ATi Crossfire: Multiply and Conquer nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer” -DanishDevil
“go watch some porn and come back in one hour” -W1zzard
“nvidia goes for the crown, ati goes for the crowd!” -Imsochobo
zOaib is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 10, 2008, 11:24 AM   #25
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,010 (2.49/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts

System Specs

this card will rock... the 4870X2 will get beat, its just a question of by how much... and that depends on clockspeed. Don't get ur panties in a wad thats just my speculation hopefully someone in far east leaks a review soon.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NVIDIA Brings GeForce 9800M and 9700M GPUs to Notebook PCs malware News 2 Jul 29, 2008 06:57 PM
Nvidia is scared of ATI’s success AphexDreamer Graphics Cards 191 Feb 8, 2008 11:18 AM
NVIDIA GPU Roadmap Outline for 1H08 Live OR Die Graphics Cards 0 Jan 8, 2008 05:41 AM
Why the FX line sucks/sucked so bad. AshenSugar Graphics Cards 36 Feb 14, 2007 12:23 AM
GeForce 7900 GTX vs. 7950 GX2 Performance Darksaber Reviews 38 Sep 15, 2006 11:45 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts