techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Other > General Nonsense

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 9, 2009, 08:28 PM   #26
ZenZimZaliben
2000 Posts
 
ZenZimZaliben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,104 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 518 Times in 384 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ZenZimZaliben

System Specs

Read anadatechs review, or Hard OCP on the 45nm Phenom. IF you were upgrading a AM2+ board the P II makes sense...but for a new build, and at that expense, the clear winner is Intel. Im not a fan boy, I prefer the faster product. For that amount of cash I would completely overlook AMD and go straight for the Q9xxx or the i7.

Also from the reviews I have seen..SLI GTX280 are faster then 1 GTX295. You are able to feed 2 PCIe slots at once vs trying to do everything over one slot...

Also why is this in General Nonsense...seems like a valid thread for General Hardware or something.
__________________
i7 930 @ 4.2Ghz
GIGABYTE x58 UD7
Kingston HyperX T1 Series 12GB
GIGABYTE 7970 (1280/1800)
OCZ Vertex 2 100GB SSD & VelociRaptor 300GB

HEATWARE
ZenZimZaliben is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZenZimZaliben For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 9, 2009, 08:45 PM   #27
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

How am I acting like a victim? lol. yes Intel is a faster product, but at some expense. I honestly thought of the 9550, and turned my head away a few times because of the prices on Intel boards, and DDR3. Again, this is back down to preference as well.. I'm looking to build something within the next month or two. I have a case, psu, and cooler all ready to go. SLI GTX280's would be my primary choice of graphics. I prefer Asus and DFI boards. I orgininally thought this would be a discussion on thoughts of the new PII.

Last edited by Bluefox1115; Jan 9, 2009 at 08:53 PM.
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 9, 2009, 09:32 PM   #28
ZenZimZaliben
2000 Posts
 
ZenZimZaliben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,104 (0.69/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 518 Times in 384 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ZenZimZaliben

System Specs

2 GTX280s is the better choice for performance. GTX280s are clocked higher and each have their own PCIe...so I agree with that 100% for a pure performance purchase...What I dont understand is if you are looking for a pure performance rig...why go AMD when as you agreed the intel cpu is clearly the better performer? Even if you went with a Q9xxx and DDR2 its still the faster solution, and not a lot more money. If you wait 3 months like you said I would imagine intel will have dropped prices a lot on the Q9xx chips. IF that happens thent here should be no question which path to take.

DFI is awesome. I highly recommend them.
__________________
i7 930 @ 4.2Ghz
GIGABYTE x58 UD7
Kingston HyperX T1 Series 12GB
GIGABYTE 7970 (1280/1800)
OCZ Vertex 2 100GB SSD & VelociRaptor 300GB

HEATWARE
ZenZimZaliben is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ZenZimZaliben For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 9, 2009, 10:31 PM   #29
B1gg3stN00b
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 672 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 111 Times in 102 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by kid41212003 View Post
Errrr, calling GIGABYTES junk hurt my feeling... LMFAO.

Anyway, If you're not going to buy an 30"LCD, than the GTX295 will fill all your needs right now.

You don't need 1GB of memory card with an 22" or 24" LCD.

You might want to read some reviews?

Your build is really incomplete, and unbalanced.
I'm running 1920x1080 and I can't run Fallout 3 or similar spec'd games comfortably on any more than 4x AA.

I have 640MB memory on my card.

I'd recommend a bigger card.

Also I recommend AMD, stable, great customer support, great, efficient chips. For my next build I'm going back to them, and I'm NEVER using Nvidia again after the garbage drivers and all the general issues with my card.

The more people who buy AMD, the cheaper Intel prices will go to compete. Recommend AMD if you like Intel!
B1gg3stN00b is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to B1gg3stN00b For This Useful Post:
Old Jan 10, 2009, 12:39 AM   #30
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefox1115 View Post
How am I acting like a victim? lol.
I'll with you

As for the funny notion that the old style GTX280 SLI > GTX295... sure look at the reviews, or you could just look at the success the guys on our forums are having with overclocked 295s @ 680 core clocks and higher. Hmmm funny thing is... There's a guy with a 295 who matched all of my graphics test scores from when I had SLI 280.

So why did SLI 280 do better than the 295 in reviews? Simple! The 280s start 51MHz faster on the core. This fact explains the higher results. I want you guys to tell more people who've owned the tech that they have no idea what they're talking about.

The worst part about 280 SLI is LIMITED gaming. You can only play so long before the card on the bottom overheats. Enjoy your P II and 280 SLI
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 01:47 AM   #31
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
I'll with you

As for the funny notion that the old style GTX280 SLI > GTX295... sure look at the reviews, or you could just look at the success the guys on our forums are having with overclocked 295s @ 680 core clocks and higher. Hmmm funny thing is... There's a guy with a 295 who matched all of my graphics test scores from when I had SLI 280.

So why did SLI 280 do better than the 295 in reviews? Simple! The 280s start 51MHz faster on the core. This fact explains the higher results. I want you guys to tell more people who've owned the tech that they have no idea what they're talking about.

The worst part about 280 SLI is LIMITED gaming. You can only play so long before the card on the bottom overheats. Enjoy your P II and 280 SLI
That's quite the attempt at bashing, but you're just coming across as an ass to me. The GTX280's also OC, they are not just bricks that you can stack in. I never said I was interested in benchmark scores, merely FPS and the ability to do F@H on 2 cards at once in one system. I don't know which GTX280 cards you "had", but I've never heard of the bottom card overheating while gaming? I've never had a problem with SLI'ed cards overheating, I guess that's what the fan controls are for? Unless you failed to set the SLI "profile type"? AFR1/2,etc., and just left it to render on 1 card. And I never said I was purchasing all this stuff tonight, I was merely asking opinions of the setup, and you turn around with insults, gestures, and bashing of PII's for no reason?
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 01:49 AM   #32
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by B1gg3stN00b View Post
I'm running 1920x1080 and I can't run Fallout 3 or similar spec'd games comfortably on any more than 4x AA.

I have 640MB memory on my card.

I'd recommend a bigger card.

Also I recommend AMD, stable, great customer support, great, efficient chips. For my next build I'm going back to them, and I'm NEVER using Nvidia again after the garbage drivers and all the general issues with my card.

The more people who buy AMD, the cheaper Intel prices will go to compete. Recommend AMD if you like Intel!
You have the old 8800GTS G90 640MB? I had a 320MB, and upgrading to an 8800GTX was like night and day.
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 02:31 AM   #33
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefox1115 View Post
That's quite the attempt at bashing, but you're just coming across as an ass to me. The GTX280's also OC, they are not just bricks that you can stack in. I never said I was interested in benchmark scores, merely FPS and the ability to do F@H on 2 cards at once in one system. I don't know which GTX280 cards you "had", but I've never heard of the bottom card overheating while gaming? I've never had a problem with SLI'ed cards overheating, I guess that's what the fan controls are for? Unless you failed to set the SLI "profile type"? AFR1/2,etc., and just left it to render on 1 card. And I never said I was purchasing all this stuff tonight, I was merely asking opinions of the setup, and you turn around with insults, gestures, and bashing of PII's for no reason?
What makes you think I'm not talking about gaming benchmarks? I owned 2x EVGA GTX280 SC. I have screens of it all over these forums. My fans were at 100% and at the overclock card one would be sitting pretty at 55C while card 2 could get as high as 77C which causes problems and crashes with the 280s. There is no breathing room between the cards. I did not insult you. Stop trying to be a victim.
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 07:52 AM   #34
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
What makes you think I'm not talking about gaming benchmarks? I owned 2x EVGA GTX280 SC. I have screens of it all over these forums. My fans were at 100% and at the overclock card one would be sitting pretty at 55C while card 2 could get as high as 77C which causes problems and crashes with the 280s. There is no breathing room between the cards. I did not insult you. Stop trying to be a victim.
When have I tried to be a victim? a victim of what? your insanity? From where I'm sitting, theres plenty of room for 2 dual slot cards to breathe nicely, maybe you have poor airflow in your case? and yes, 77celcius would make any system lock up and crash. and stop trying to be a smartass, it's not really working for you tonight.
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 08:38 AM   #35
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.49/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefox1115 View Post
When have I tried to be a victim? a victim of what? your insanity? From where I'm sitting, theres plenty of room for 2 dual slot cards to breathe nicely, maybe you have poor airflow in your case? and yes, 77celcius would make any system lock up and crash. and stop trying to be a smartass, it's not really working for you tonight.
What are you going to put it in slot 1 and slot 3? That will cause problems :-/

Anyway I have GREAT airflow thanks for wondering. Why do you still think I'm
being a smartass? I also never said my system would entirely lock up and crash.
Applications would crash & benchmarks would not finish. Crysis would lag.

You're a nice man
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 02:54 PM   #36
B1gg3stN00b
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 672 (0.32/day)
Thanks: 87
Thanked 111 Times in 102 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefox1115 View Post
You have the old 8800GTS G90 640MB? I had a 320MB, and upgrading to an 8800GTX was like night and day.
I'm going to wait until the next series of ATI cards comes out before I even remotely think of upgrading again.
B1gg3stN00b is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 10, 2009, 04:25 PM   #37
Damian^
200 Posts
 
Damian^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 486 (0.27/day)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Damian^ Send a message via Skype™ to Damian^

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenZimZaliben View Post
I prefer the faster product. For that amount of cash I would completely overlook AMD and go straight for the Q9xxx or the i7.

Also from the reviews I have seen..SLI GTX280 are faster then 1 GTX295. You are able to feed 2 PCIe slots at once vs trying to do everything over one slot...
The Phenom II is generally on par with most Q9*** series of processors.
SLI GTX 280 is not "always" better:
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...295_full/5.htm

As you can see from the graphs, a GTX 280 SI set up usually gets away with 1-3FPS differnce or goes under 1-3 FPS. GTX 280 SLI can range from 700-800 while the gTX 295 is $480-500
__________________
"Cold silence has a tendency to atrophy any sense of compassion, between supposed lovers, between supposed brothers. And I know the pieces fit."
-Maynard James Keenan
Damian^ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 13, 2009, 07:15 PM   #38
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by B1gg3stN00b View Post
I'm going to wait until the next series of ATI cards comes out before I even remotely think of upgrading again.
Honestly, nvidia has some good drivers now, not like before when the high end 8 series first came out. I would say grab a 9800GTX+ and call it a day. they can be had for about $170 now, plus a $20 or $30MIR.. The physics drivers and display drivers work great for me on my 8800GTX..
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 13, 2009, 07:17 PM   #39
Bluefox1115
500 Posts
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RI, USA
Posts: 688 (0.34/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 46 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Bluefox1115

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Binge View Post
What are you going to put it in slot 1 and slot 3? That will cause problems :-/

Anyway I have GREAT airflow thanks for wondering. Why do you still think I'm
being a smartass? I also never said my system would entirely lock up and crash.
Applications would crash & benchmarks would not finish. Crysis would lag.

You're a nice man
Look I can't stand fudeing and arguing. Peace, or no peace? P.S. This is not Independance Day. lol
Bluefox1115 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your CPU Timeline xubidoo General Hardware 273 Jan 7, 2011 03:56 AM
The ScienceMark thread (Score list inside) pt Overclocking & Cooling 417 Aug 22, 2010 06:26 PM
ScienceMark thread (with score list) _33 Overclocking & Cooling 2736 Aug 25, 2007 09:19 PM
I've moved to the Darkside does anyone have this motherboard trt740 Overclocking & Cooling 27 May 23, 2007 05:10 PM
AMD Announces Next Generation Native Quad-Core Opterons malware News 8 Aug 16, 2006 06:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts