techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 26, 2009, 04:11 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Safari 4 Beta Tested, Gives IE7 a Sound Thrashing at JavaScript Performance

There is a valid reason behind why Safari is growing in browser market-share, apart from the fact that iPhone carries it: it is arguably the fastest browser there is. The fourth beta version that surfaced earlier this week went a few notches ahead of Firefox (Minefield) 3.2a1 and Google Chrome in a review conducted by CNet, to take the top-sport for the fastest web-browser. Internet Explorer (IE) versions 7 and 8, Opera 9.6, Firefox 3, Chrome, Firefox(Minefield) 3.1 Alpha 1 and Safari 4 were put through JavaScript tests using the SunSpider suite. The PC was equipped with a Core 2 Duo processor running at 2.10 GHz. Safari 4 beta gave IE 7 a sound thrashing at the test, emerging 42 times faster. The performance difference between the two were so vast that the reviewers had to prepare a seperate graph without IE 7 so there could be more resolution in the charts showing the differences between the rest of the contendors. Then again, one must take into account the fact that Chrome and Firefox (Minefield) 3.2 weren't all that behind Safari 4 beta, only a few notches. The scores are denoted by render time in terms of milliseconds. Lesser the better. The scores stand at:
  • Safari 4 (Total time: 910 ms)
  • Mozilla Minefield 3.2a1 (1,136 ms)
  • Google Chrome (1,177 ms)
  • Firefox 3 (3,250 ms)
  • Opera 9.6 (4,076 ms)
  • Internet Explorer 8 (5,839 ms)
  • Internet Explorer 7 (39,026 ms)



Source: CNET

Last edited by btarunr; Feb 26, 2009 at 04:19 PM.
btarunr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 04:23 PM   #2
xfire
1000 Posts
 
xfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad,India
Posts: 1,166 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 367
Thanked 197 Times in 169 Posts

System Specs

they should have tested opera 10 alpha too, but I got to agree that safari is very fast. Not there for Linux though. Opera is all I need.
__________________
Your one stop source for all thing open source
Posting pics the TPU way!
http://imkingsnake.blogspot.com/
“if anyone expects great things from the Intel IGP market I want what you smoke k?” -candle_86
xfire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 04:47 PM   #3
oli_ramsay
2000 Posts
 
oli_ramsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.29/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
Send a message via MSN to oli_ramsay

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by xfire View Post
they should have tested opera 10 alpha too, but I got to agree that safari is very fast. Not there for Linux though. Opera is all I need.
Agreed, opera 10 alpha is supposed to be 30% faster. Would be cool to see it included in the test.
oli_ramsay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 04:49 PM   #4
iStink
200 Posts
 
iStink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 49 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

As much as I hate Apple, I have to say, this browser does seem very quick, so my hats off to them.

Looking at the numbers, however, I think some of the results are close enough that people won't be looking at browsers like safari, google chrome, or minefield for their speed over one another, but for their UI. How features are laid out and the software's ease of use is what will increase users. For instance, how fast is fast enough? At what point can the human brain tell a difference in speed between one browser to the next? If minefield feels better, people will download it, but if safari has a better feel, and it's easier to use, then people will go with it. 500ms isnt enough to convince me to take safari over minefield if safari feels awkward to use...
__________________
iStink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 04:50 PM   #5
spearman914
2000 Posts
 
spearman914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
Send a message via AIM to spearman914

System Specs

I really don't care bout this. I just love firefox because of their add-ons.
__________________
.................................................. ..
“Originally Posted by mlee49 So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
spearman914 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 05:01 PM   #6
mdm-adph
2000 Posts
 
mdm-adph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts

System Specs

I like the speed, but they couldn't have taken more design cues from Google's current Chrome if they had tried.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
mdm-adph is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 05:02 PM   #7
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

ahhh. Safari doesn't support eBay, also it crashes (3.2 too). not a good browser.
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 05:13 PM   #8
farlex85
3500 Posts
 
farlex85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,114 (1.83/day)
Thanks: 369
Thanked 647 Times in 612 Posts

System Specs

Fantastic, those extra 200 ms will save oodles of time for me, a modern man with a busy lifestyle. I just don't have all second to be waiting around on java to load the page. Apple you've done it again. *stands and applauds*
farlex85 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 05:39 PM   #9
Assimilator
200 Posts
 
Assimilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 425 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts

System Specs

Pro: Internet Explorer 8 is 8x faster than IE7.
Con: Internet Explorer is still the slowest browser on test.

Microsoft needs to stop wasting their time on IE development, because it's obvious they just can't compete.
__________________
<html> <code> <style>

The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4
4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5)
Assimilator is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 05:41 PM   #10
csendesmark
200 Posts
 
csendesmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU/Hungary
Posts: 330 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Send a message via MSN to csendesmark Send a message via Skype™ to csendesmark

System Specs

There is Safari 4 beta, but where is FF 3.1 and Opera 10? ^^

.....and where can I find those webbrowser benchmarks?

This "Web browser benchmark reseult" is too lame.. ....I mean NONAME

ACID1-2-3 is a test, and it has a name

Quote:
Originally Posted by Assimilator View Post
Pro: Internet Explorer 8 is 8x faster than IE7.
Con: Internet Explorer is still the slowest browser on test.

Microsoft needs to stop wasting their time on IE development, because it's obvious they just can't compete.
They started a new project to retire IE, it's name is: Gazelle
But it is not fast as the name... it's a turtle
__________________
Core i7 950 @ 4,2GHz | Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME | 3 × 2GB DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Radeon HD 6970-2048 | Corsair TX750 | Sabayon Linux | Opera | TeamFortress 2 | Left 4 Dead 2 | StarCraft 2 | $11€
TECH-POWER-UP
csendesmark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 06:11 PM   #11
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Minefield is not the code-name of FF 64bit?
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 06:18 PM   #12
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Does anyone realise that IE8 is only 2 seconds slower than firefox. Either way even though safari is the fastest it doesn't fit in with windows and lots of webpages don't work with it etc even though I like it the most.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 06:23 PM   #13
niko084
Eligible for custom title
 
niko084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to niko084 Send a message via AIM to niko084 Send a message via Skype™ to niko084

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
ahhh. Safari doesn't support eBay, also it crashes (3.2 too). not a good browser.
Indeed, most Mac users don't even use Safari... But it's not that its not a good browser, its that web programmers don't follow "STANDARDS", if you check it Safari follows more standards than any other browser by a LONG shot.

12yr old kids need not be doing web work!
__________________
This electronic post is encrypted in the 'English language method', any attempt to decipher meaning from these symbols is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. This includes, but is not limited to: interpreting the symbols through use of biological, visual decryption devices, translating the symbols into another language encryption scheme, and digital processing the symbols into a form conducive to oral interpretation.
HWBOT HEATWARE
niko084 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 07:25 PM   #14
npp
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 36 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts

I don't care at all about the JavaScript processing speed of browsers, and I never had the feeling any of the browsers I'de used was slow. They're are close enough, that's it.

The only thing that counts for me is functionality, and Opera has by far the most functional and flexible interface I've seen. I was sceptical about that once, but now I can't even imagine switching back to Firefox, or even Safari (I used to have that for a couple of hours once, and it simply felt wrong - I'm a windows UI retard, obviously).

As for compatibility - if a web site is lame, chances are it will be rendered incorrectly in any browser, at least that's what I've seen. So Safari may be a good choice, but Apple will have to do miracles to convince Firefox/Opera users to switch to it. Any ideas what those might be?
npp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 07:41 PM   #15
Ravenas
3500 Posts
 
Ravenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,991 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 316 Times in 244 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
ahhh. Safari doesn't support eBay, also it crashes (3.2 too). not a good browser.
Lol. Really? What are you talking about man. eBay doesn't support Safari because they don't want to spend the development dollars. Not the other way around.

Why doesn't ebay support development for Safari because the market share for Safari isn't really all that high as of right now.

Additionally, you can use eBay with Safari easily if you know html. All the eBay script does is convert a word like processor to html. I use it all the time.

Love how everyone makes everything out to be Apple's fault.

Also, bta...no offense man, but didn't a I already post this?

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=86345
Ravenas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 08:01 PM   #16
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenas View Post
Lol. Really? What are you talking about man. eBay doesn't support Safari because they don't want to spend the development dollars. Not the other way around.

Why doesn't ebay support development for Safari because the market share for Safari isn't really all that high as of right now.

Additionally, you can use eBay with Safari easily if you know html. All the eBay script does is convert a word like processor to html. I use it all the time.

Love how everyone makes everything out to be Apple's fault.

Also, bta...no offense man, but didn't a I already post this?

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=86345
when i tried to pay something on ebay (paypal): safari is not supported. please use ie or firefox."
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 08:01 PM   #17
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
the reviewers had to prepare a seperate graph without IE 7 so there could be more resolution
These reviewers need to be introduced to a LOG SCALE graph. LOL

Anyway, javascript, what about HTML rendering. Isnt that what 99% of web data is?

And personally, I want my javascript as SLOW as possible. Nothing worse than extra fast malware getting hold of the PC through adverts you dont want to see.

(I turn javascript off, to avoid ADVERTISING, MALWARE, and other scripted-but-not-wanted rubbish).
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 09:37 PM   #18
Ravenas
3500 Posts
 
Ravenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,991 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 316 Times in 244 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
when i tried to pay something on ebay (paypal): safari is not supported. please use ie or firefox."
Yes, you just restated what I said, eBay doesn't support Safari. Safari supports and will work with eBay, however, eBay won't spend the development dollars for Safari support.

However, what you said is completely untrue, at least with my past 3 years experience of using Safari with eBay.

I've been using eBay with Safari for the last 3+ years. I got my Macbook when I was 18 and I've been using Safari since then. I have no other browsers on my HDD. I've never once encountered a problem with eBay on it, everything works perfect. (Except for the word processing script that converts text to html when you enter an item description.)

Here's a look at my eBay profile:

http://myworld.ebay.com/rasnyder5
Ravenas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 11:01 PM   #19
cyriene
75 Posts
 
cyriene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 172 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts

System Specs

Looks nice, but Opera suits me the best. Have it customized just the way I like it
cyriene is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 11:09 PM   #20
mtosev
1000 Posts
 
mtosev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenas View Post
Yes, you just restated what I said, eBay doesn't support Safari. Safari supports and will work with eBay, however, eBay won't spend the development dollars for Safari support.

However, what you said is completely untrue, at least with my past 3 years experience of using Safari with eBay.

I've been using eBay with Safari for the last 3+ years. I got my Macbook when I was 18 and I've been using Safari since then. I have no other browsers on my HDD. I've never once encountered a problem with eBay on it, everything works perfect. (Except for the word processing script that converts text to html when you enter an item description.)

Here's a look at my eBay profile:

http://myworld.ebay.com/rasnyder5
Safari crashes often. Like this: there is no error just all of the open safari windows close and that's that. also sometimes it wont play youtube videos. the same work on ie or ff. it helps to terminate safari then start it again then it works for sometime until it happens again.

no thank you apple.
__________________
My notebook:

Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset

[img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG]

CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News"

Last edited by mtosev; Feb 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM.
mtosev is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 26, 2009, 11:09 PM   #21
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
 
PVTCaboose1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts

System Specs

Although firefox is allegedly slower, I will still stick with it.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
PVTCaboose1337 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 12:11 AM   #22
Ravenas
3500 Posts
 
Ravenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,991 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 316 Times in 244 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtosev View Post
Safari crashes often. Like this: there is no error just all of the open safari windows close and that's that. also sometimes it wont play youtube videos. the same work on ie or ff. it helps to terminate safari then start it again then it works for sometime until it happens again.

no thank you apple.
First it was eBay, then its Safari randomly crashes. The eBay part I've never experienced the problems you are trying to explain. Safari does sometimes, although I will say its rare, crash on Windows platform. I report it to Apple every time it happens.

I will say though, you don't have to convince me of reasons why you don't want to use Safari. To each man his own, and I won't try to convince you to use it either way. The benches and tests are there, do with them what you will.

Ravenas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 12:37 AM   #23
iStink
200 Posts
 
iStink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 49 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

i finally downloaded and tried google chrome. My dear God in heaven. Apple sues any company that even remotely copies anything from the iphone, and yet they completely and utterly rip off google chrome's UI.

I hate apple and I hate anyone who likes apple.
__________________
iStink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 01:55 AM   #24
Ravenas
3500 Posts
 
Ravenas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,991 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 316 Times in 244 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by iStink View Post
i finally downloaded and tried google chrome. My dear God in heaven. Apple sues any company that even remotely copies anything from the iphone, and yet they completely and utterly rip off google chrome's UI.

I hate apple and I hate anyone who likes apple.
Apple already had their UI. Google Chrome came out and introduced tabs at the top.

I mean, FFS the old tabs were used by everyone and their mother. IE, FF, and Safari all had tabs situated right below the address bar.

Lets not get into who started what here... Bias posting at its best.
Ravenas is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:29 AM   #25
aj28
200 Posts
 
aj28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 352 (0.20/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 35 Times in 33 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdez View Post
Minefield is not the code-name of FF 64bit?
Minefield is the codename for nightly builds of Firefox.
aj28 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel QX6700 Quad Core D_o_S Reviews 14 Jan 8, 2007 06:15 AM
Does a sound card give better overall performance than onboard sound? MiST91 General Hardware 45 Dec 18, 2006 10:17 PM
Razer Barracuda HP-1 Frederik S Reviews 3 Dec 18, 2006 12:16 PM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
having problems with cod 2 MATTB25 Games 12 Jul 19, 2006 01:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts