![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,982 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
Safari 4 Beta Tested, Gives IE7 a Sound Thrashing at JavaScript Performance
There is a valid reason behind why Safari is growing in browser market-share, apart from the fact that iPhone carries it: it is arguably the fastest browser there is. The fourth beta version that surfaced earlier this week went a few notches ahead of Firefox (Minefield) 3.2a1 and Google Chrome in a review conducted by CNet, to take the top-sport for the fastest web-browser. Internet Explorer (IE) versions 7 and 8, Opera 9.6, Firefox 3, Chrome, Firefox(Minefield) 3.1 Alpha 1 and Safari 4 were put through JavaScript tests using the SunSpider suite. The PC was equipped with a Core 2 Duo processor running at 2.10 GHz. Safari 4 beta gave IE 7 a sound thrashing at the test, emerging 42 times faster. The performance difference between the two were so vast that the reviewers had to prepare a seperate graph without IE 7 so there could be more resolution in the charts showing the differences between the rest of the contendors. Then again, one must take into account the fact that Chrome and Firefox (Minefield) 3.2 weren't all that behind Safari 4 beta, only a few notches. The scores are denoted by render time in terms of milliseconds. Lesser the better. The scores stand at:
![]() Source: CNET Last edited by btarunr; Feb 26, 2009 at 04:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hyderabad,India
Posts: 1,166 (0.58/day)
Thanks: 367
Thanked 197 Times in 169 Posts
|
they should have tested opera 10 alpha too, but I got to agree that safari is very fast. Not there for Linux though. Opera is all I need.
__________________
Your one stop source for all thing open source Posting pics the TPU way! http://imkingsnake.blogspot.com/ “if anyone expects great things from the Intel IGP market I want what you smoke k?” -candle_86
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,679 (1.29/day)
Thanks: 577
Thanked 592 Times in 450 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() |
As much as I hate Apple, I have to say, this browser does seem very quick, so my hats off to them.
Looking at the numbers, however, I think some of the results are close enough that people won't be looking at browsers like safari, google chrome, or minefield for their speed over one another, but for their UI. How features are laid out and the software's ease of use is what will increase users. For instance, how fast is fast enough? At what point can the human brain tell a difference in speed between one browser to the next? If minefield feels better, people will download it, but if safari has a better feel, and it's easier to use, then people will go with it. 500ms isnt enough to convince me to take safari over minefield if safari feels awkward to use...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brooklyn, New York 11223
Posts: 3,000 (1.61/day)
Thanks: 339
Thanked 510 Times in 482 Posts
|
I really don't care bout this. I just love firefox because of their add-ons.
__________________
.................................................. .. ![]() “Originally Posted by mlee49
So pain level on a 1 to 10 scale, 10 being having a wart removed on your butthole with pliers.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Your house.
Posts: 2,426 (1.08/day)
Thanks: 401
Thanked 344 Times in 247 Posts
|
I like the speed, but they couldn't have taken more design cues from Google's current Chrome if they had tried.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts
|
ahhh. Safari doesn't support eBay, also it crashes (3.2 too). not a good browser.
__________________
My notebook: Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset [img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG] CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
Fantastic, those extra 200 ms will save oodles of time for me, a modern man with a busy lifestyle. I just don't have all second to be waiting around on java to load the page. Apple you've done it again. *stands and applauds*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Africa
Posts: 425 (0.14/day)
Thanks: 113
Thanked 56 Times in 41 Posts
|
Pro: Internet Explorer 8 is 8x faster than IE7.
Con: Internet Explorer is still the slowest browser on test. Microsoft needs to stop wasting their time on IE development, because it's obvious they just can't compete.
__________________
<html> <code> <style> The QuadFather: 4x4x4x4 4 cores (QX9650) / 4 GPUs (2x 9800 GX2) / 4x 2GB DDR2-800 / 4 hard disks (quad 320GB Seagates, RAID-5) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: EU/Hungary
Posts: 330 (0.17/day)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
|
There is Safari 4 beta, but where is FF 3.1 and Opera 10? ^^
.....and where can I find those webbrowser benchmarks? This "Web browser benchmark reseult" is too lame.. ....I mean NONAME ![]() ACID1-2-3 is a test, and it has a name ![]() Quote:
But it is not fast as the name... it's a turtle
__________________
Core i7 950 @ 4,2GHz | Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME | 3 × 2GB DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Radeon HD 6970-2048 | Corsair TX750 | Sabayon Linux | Opera | TeamFortress 2 | Left 4 Dead 2 | StarCraft 2 | $1 ≠ 1€
TECH-POWER-UP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
|
Minefield is not the code-name of FF 64bit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Doctor is in the house
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.29/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
|
Does anyone realise that IE8 is only 2 seconds slower than firefox. Either way even though safari is the fastest it doesn't fit in with windows and lots of webpages don't work with it etc even though I like it the most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
|
Quote:
12yr old kids need not be doing web work!
__________________
This electronic post is encrypted in the 'English language method', any attempt to decipher meaning from these symbols is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. This includes, but is not limited to: interpreting the symbols through use of biological, visual decryption devices, translating the symbols into another language encryption scheme, and digital processing the symbols into a form conducive to oral interpretation. HWBOT HEATWARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 36 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
I don't care at all about the JavaScript processing speed of browsers, and I never had the feeling any of the browsers I'de used was slow. They're are close enough, that's it.
The only thing that counts for me is functionality, and Opera has by far the most functional and flexible interface I've seen. I was sceptical about that once, but now I can't even imagine switching back to Firefox, or even Safari (I used to have that for a couple of hours once, and it simply felt wrong - I'm a windows UI retard, obviously). As for compatibility - if a web site is lame, chances are it will be rendered incorrectly in any browser, at least that's what I've seen. So Safari may be a good choice, but Apple will have to do miracles to convince Firefox/Opera users to switch to it. Any ideas what those might be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,986 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 313 Times in 243 Posts
|
Quote:
Why doesn't ebay support development for Safari because the market share for Safari isn't really all that high as of right now. Additionally, you can use eBay with Safari easily if you know html. All the eBay script does is convert a word like processor to html. I use it all the time. Love how everyone makes everything out to be Apple's fault. Also, bta...no offense man, but didn't a I already post this? http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=86345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
My notebook: Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset [img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG] CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
Quote:
Anyway, javascript, what about HTML rendering. Isnt that what 99% of web data is? And personally, I want my javascript as SLOW as possible. Nothing worse than extra fast malware getting hold of the PC through adverts you dont want to see. ![]() (I turn javascript off, to avoid ADVERTISING, MALWARE, and other scripted-but-not-wanted rubbish). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,986 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 313 Times in 243 Posts
|
Quote:
However, what you said is completely untrue, at least with my past 3 years experience of using Safari with eBay. I've been using eBay with Safari for the last 3+ years. I got my Macbook when I was 18 and I've been using Safari since then. I have no other browsers on my HDD. I've never once encountered a problem with eBay on it, everything works perfect. (Except for the word processing script that converts text to html when you enter an item description.) Here's a look at my eBay profile: http://myworld.ebay.com/rasnyder5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 172 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Looks nice, but Opera suits me the best. Have it customized just the way I like it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maribor, Slovenia
Posts: 1,145 (0.38/day)
Thanks: 72
Thanked 147 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
no thank you apple.
__________________
My notebook: Dell Inspiron 1520 (6464) Intel Core 2 Duo (Merom) T7500, 2gb Hyundai 667MHz DDR2 CL5, 8600M GT 256Mb DDR2, 160Gb Seagate NCQ SATA, TSST DVD-RAM/+/-RW, PM/GM965 chipset [img disabled]http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/534/326cd7.gif[/IMG] CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News" Last edited by mtosev; Feb 26, 2009 at 11:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Graphical Hacker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 7,478 (2.80/day)
Thanks: 798
Thanked 1,174 Times in 834 Posts
|
Although firefox is allegedly slower, I will still stick with it.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,986 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 313 Times in 243 Posts
|
Quote:
I will say though, you don't have to convince me of reasons why you don't want to use Safari. To each man his own, and I won't try to convince you to use it either way. The benches and tests are there, do with them what you will.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() |
i finally downloaded and tried google chrome. My dear God in heaven. Apple sues any company that even remotely copies anything from the iphone, and yet they completely and utterly rip off google chrome's UI.
I hate apple and I hate anyone who likes apple.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,986 (1.82/day)
Thanks: 387
Thanked 313 Times in 243 Posts
|
Quote:
I mean, FFS the old tabs were used by everyone and their mother. IE, FF, and Safari all had tabs situated right below the address bar. Lets not get into who started what here... Bias posting at its best. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel QX6700 Quad Core | D_o_S | Reviews | 14 | Jan 8, 2007 06:15 AM |
| Does a sound card give better overall performance than onboard sound? | MiST91 | General Hardware | 45 | Dec 18, 2006 10:17 PM |
| Razer Barracuda HP-1 | Frederik S | Reviews | 3 | Dec 18, 2006 12:16 PM |
| System Builder's Guide 2006 | djbbenn | Articles | 37 | Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM |
| having problems with cod 2 | MATTB25 | Games | 12 | Jul 19, 2006 01:45 PM |