![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Editor & Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
|
Samsung Adopts VIA Nano Processor for the Samsung NC20 12.1'' Mini-Notebook
VIA Technologies, Inc, a leading innovator of power efficient x86 processor platforms, today announced that Samsung has adopted the VIA Nano processor in the new Samsung NC20 mini-notebook.
Mobility is enhanced by 802.11b/g and Bluetooth wireless connectivity, and a six-cell battery that provides up to 6.5 hours of use independent of any power supply, while storage options include either a solid state disk or a SATA hard disk drive. Other features include an integrated 1.3 mega pixel digital motion camera, 3-in-1 memory card reader and three built-in USB ports. ![]() "We are delighted that Samsung has adopted the VIA Nano processor for the Samsung NC20," said Richard Brown, Vice President of Marketing, VIA Technologies, Inc. "This is a truly ground-breaking product that sets the new industry standard for consumer mini-notes and clearly demonstrates the advanced performance of our VIA Nano processor platform." Samsung NC20 Mini-Notebook Specifications Screen: 12.1" LED WXGA (1280 x 800) CPU: VIA Nano ULV Processor U2250 (1.3+GHz, 800MHz) Chipset: VIA VX800 Unified Digital Media IGP Chipset Graphics: Integrated VIA Chrome9 with DirectX 9.0 3D graphics support and hardware video acceleration OS: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Memory: 1GB DDR2 (1*SODMM) Storage: 160GB HDD (9.5mmH 2.5''HDD, SATA) Webcam: 1.3 Mega pixels web camera LAN: 10/100Mbps LAN Wireless: Atheros 802.11 b/g Bluetooth: 2.0+EDR (Enhanced Data Rate) I/O Ports: USB 2.0 x 3, Ethernet LAN, 3-in-1 card reader Battery: 6 cells Li-ion Battery Standard Dimensions: 292.4 mm x 217 mm x 30.7 mm Weight: 1.52 kg Special Feature: 6.5 hours battery life Colour: White Last edited by malware; Feb 27, 2009 at 07:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
|
I've been wanting a netbook! I will probably grab a VIA CPU one and install win7 on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() P.S. VIAs cpus are slower that Intels
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16 [img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Eligible for custom title
|
w00t! First REAL product with the VIA Nano. Can't wait for the head to head shootout on performance NC10 (Atom) vs. NC20 (Nano).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts
|
6.5hours of battery?
sweet!
__________________
![]() “Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 106 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
|
Interested, tired of Intel, wheres the beef, head to head comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,394 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 320 Times in 242 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Eligible for custom title
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
|
Finally some better screen resolution as well.
I'm so used to 1920x1200 and 1920x1080, I wouldn't mind a 12" 1200P netbook ![]() It will be interesting to see how the public received this not being an Atom processor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tripoli/Libya
Posts: 47 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
6.5 hours great tha's what i looking for ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts
|
The CPU used in this netbook (or whatever you want to call it) is the Nano CPU, not the old crappy C7s. The nano can hold its own against the Atom from what I've seen.
My only beef is that the via used in the HP netbook runs really hot, and from what I understand, the HP (mini-note, I believe?) is the noisiest of the netbooks. Whereas the Dell mini 9 is the quietest (my reason for buying it) because there is not one fan- the keyboard is actually used as one big heatspreader!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,304 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 137 Times in 121 Posts
|
I don't get why people are saying the battery's good on this one, the NC10 can easily breach 10 hours just by turning the wireless off and turn the volume down.
__________________
Lappy: AMD athlon/ turion TK-53 2GB Crucial RAM@667 512MB Generic@667 Acer travelmate motherboard, unsure, Liteon laptop Power supply,ATI mobility Radeon, x1250,120GB HD “Testicles and birthday presents yum!” -joinmeindeath417
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Quote:
Any way I will see what are the specks of the nano ![]() P.S. Via C7 1.2 GHz has a TDP of 5W !!!
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16 [img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
the nano is still 65nm same as c7 atom is 45nm
is the 1.6 supposed to be faster then atom or the 1.8
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16 [img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Australia
Posts: 1,330 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 178 Times in 157 Posts
|
The Nano is far ahead of the Atom in terms of architecture; it has 1 MB of L2 cache, compared to the Atom's 512 kb. It has Out-of-order execution, which allows it to run multiple instructions at once. The Atom uses Pentium P5 arch, which is much slower than the Pentium Pro (which uses OOO Execution).
Also, the VIA chipsets are head and shoulders above Intel's GSE945, which somewhat ballences out the power usage.
__________________
Third rig: PC Express Invader. C2D E6400 2.13GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, 320GB HDD, Intel 945, Asus 9600GT 512MB, 550W PSU, W7 HP 64-bit. Fourth Rig: Dell Optiplex 170L, P4 Prescott 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR266RAM, 80GB HDD, FX5200PCI 128MB, 250W PSU,XP Pro Fifth rig (Laptop): Dell Inspiron 4000, 14.1", PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 9.3GB, XP Pro. Now with passive cooling! “I could make a better looking computer case with a bucket of Lincoln Logs.” -lemode
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What make and speed is my video card memory? | W1zzard | Articles | 4 | Mar 25, 2005 06:12 AM |