techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Feb 27, 2009, 02:38 PM   #1
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.30/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,899 Times in 5,650 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Samsung Adopts VIA Nano Processor for the Samsung NC20 12.1'' Mini-Notebook

VIA Technologies, Inc, a leading innovator of power efficient x86 processor platforms, today announced that Samsung has adopted the VIA Nano processor in the new Samsung NC20 mini-notebook.

Mobility is enhanced by 802.11b/g and Bluetooth wireless connectivity, and a six-cell battery that provides up to 6.5 hours of use independent of any power supply, while storage options include either a solid state disk or a SATA hard disk drive. Other features include an integrated 1.3 mega pixel digital motion camera, 3-in-1 memory card reader and three built-in USB ports.



"We are delighted that Samsung has adopted the VIA Nano processor for the Samsung NC20," said Richard Brown, Vice President of Marketing, VIA Technologies, Inc. "This is a truly ground-breaking product that sets the new industry standard for consumer mini-notes and clearly demonstrates the advanced performance of our VIA Nano processor platform."

Samsung NC20 Mini-Notebook Specifications

Screen: 12.1" LED WXGA (1280 x 800)
CPU: VIA Nano ULV Processor U2250 (1.3+GHz, 800MHz)
Chipset: VIA VX800 Unified Digital Media IGP Chipset
Graphics: Integrated VIA Chrome9 with DirectX 9.0 3D graphics support and hardware video acceleration
OS: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Memory: 1GB DDR2 (1*SODMM)
Storage: 160GB HDD (9.5mmH 2.5''HDD, SATA)
Webcam: 1.3 Mega pixels web camera
LAN: 10/100Mbps LAN
Wireless: Atheros 802.11 b/g
Bluetooth: 2.0+EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
I/O Ports: USB 2.0 x 3, Ethernet LAN, 3-in-1 card reader
Battery: 6 cells Li-ion Battery Standard
Dimensions: 292.4 mm x 217 mm x 30.7 mm
Weight: 1.52 kg
Special Feature: 6.5 hours battery life
Colour: White

Last edited by malware; Feb 27, 2009 at 07:31 PM.
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 02:43 PM   #2
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

I've been wanting a netbook! I will probably grab a VIA CPU one and install win7 on it.
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:06 PM   #3
to6ko91
75 Posts
 
to6ko91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to to6ko91

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFold View Post
I've been wanting a netbook! I will probably grab a VIA CPU one and install win7 on it.
its mini-notebook not a netbook

P.S. VIAs cpus are slower that Intels
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz
Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16
[img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
to6ko91 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:11 PM   #4
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

w00t! First REAL product with the VIA Nano. Can't wait for the head to head shootout on performance NC10 (Atom) vs. NC20 (Nano).
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:24 PM   #5
WhiteLotus
3500 Posts
 
WhiteLotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 4,808 (2.26/day)
Thanks: 530
Thanked 856 Times in 682 Posts

System Specs

6.5hours of battery?


sweet!
__________________
http://tpucdn.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic41435_1.gif

“Sorry but I cannot respond now, I am running a full virus scan on the internet.” -brandonwh64
WhiteLotus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:37 PM   #6
IcrushitI
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 106 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Interested, tired of Intel, wheres the beef, head to head comparison.
IcrushitI is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 04:50 PM   #7
Lazzer408
2000 Posts
 
Lazzer408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,394 (1.03/day)
Thanks: 80
Thanked 320 Times in 242 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
w00t! First REAL product with the VIA Nano. Can't wait for the head to head shootout on performance NC10 (Atom) vs. NC20 (Nano).
Intel will hand Via it's ass with a side of potatoes.
Lazzer408 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 05:11 PM   #8
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,361
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Finally some better screen resolution as well.

I'm so used to 1920x1200 and 1920x1080, I wouldn't mind a 12" 1200P netbook

It will be interesting to see how the public received this not being an Atom processor.
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 05:15 PM   #9
Hitman.1stGame
25 Posts
 
Hitman.1stGame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tripoli/Libya
Posts: 47 (0.03/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts

System Specs

6.5 hours great tha's what i looking for ..
Hitman.1stGame is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 06:34 PM   #10
devguy
1000 Posts
 
devguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,198 (0.52/day)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 171 Times in 133 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by to6ko91 View Post
P.S. VIAs cpus are slower that Intels
The CPU used in this netbook (or whatever you want to call it) is the Nano CPU, not the old crappy C7s. The nano can hold its own against the Atom from what I've seen.

My only beef is that the via used in the HP netbook runs really hot, and from what I understand, the HP (mini-note, I believe?) is the noisiest of the netbooks. Whereas the Dell mini 9 is the quietest (my reason for buying it) because there is not one fan- the keyboard is actually used as one big heatspreader!
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
devguy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 07:17 PM   #11
crazy pyro
1000 Posts
 
crazy pyro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 1,304 (0.73/day)
Thanks: 290
Thanked 137 Times in 121 Posts
Send a message via MSN to crazy pyro

System Specs

I don't get why people are saying the battery's good on this one, the NC10 can easily breach 10 hours just by turning the wireless off and turn the volume down.
__________________
Lappy: AMD athlon/ turion TK-53
2GB Crucial RAM@667 512MB Generic@667
Acer travelmate motherboard, unsure, Liteon laptop Power supply,ATI mobility Radeon, x1250,120GB HD
“Testicles and birthday presents yum!” -joinmeindeath417
crazy pyro is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 08:27 PM   #12
to6ko91
75 Posts
 
to6ko91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to to6ko91

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by devguy View Post
The CPU used in this netbook (or whatever you want to call it) is the Nano CPU, not the old crappy C7s. The nano can hold its own against the Atom from what I've seen.

My only beef is that the via used in the HP netbook runs really hot, and from what I understand, the HP (mini-note, I believe?) is the noisiest of the netbooks. Whereas the Dell mini 9 is the quietest (my reason for buying it) because there is not one fan- the keyboard is actually used as one big heatspreader!
I have an HP mini-note 2133 with via (c7) and it is quiet but the cpu is crappy @ 1.2GHz the other hp models (2133) has via c7 1.6GHz and the 10 inch has an atom cpu @ 1.6GHz
Any way I will see what are the specks of the nano

P.S. Via C7 1.2 GHz has a TDP of 5W !!!
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz
Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16
[img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
to6ko91 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 08:54 PM   #13
Valdez
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Szekszárd, Hungary
Posts: 292 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by to6ko91 View Post
I have an HP mini-note 2133 with via (c7) and it is quiet but the cpu is crappy @ 1.2GHz the other hp models (2133) has via c7 1.6GHz and the 10 inch has an atom cpu @ 1.6GHz
Any way I will see what are the specks of the nano

P.S. Via C7 1.2 GHz has a TDP of 5W !!!
c7 is crap, but nano is a very good processor (compared to its competition).
Valdez is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2009, 10:33 PM   #14
to6ko91
75 Posts
 
to6ko91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 190 (0.11/day)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to to6ko91

System Specs

the nano is still 65nm same as c7 atom is 45nm
is the 1.6 supposed to be faster then atom or the 1.8
__________________
CPU : Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 @ 3 GHz
Ram: 4GB @ 820MHz | 2x2GB 5-4-4-16
[img...]www.danasoft.com/sig/BorisX.jpg[/img]
to6ko91 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Feb 28, 2009, 06:14 AM   #15
Error 404
1000 Posts
 
Error 404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Australia
Posts: 1,330 (0.71/day)
Thanks: 166
Thanked 178 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Error 404

System Specs

The Nano is far ahead of the Atom in terms of architecture; it has 1 MB of L2 cache, compared to the Atom's 512 kb. It has Out-of-order execution, which allows it to run multiple instructions at once. The Atom uses Pentium P5 arch, which is much slower than the Pentium Pro (which uses OOO Execution).
Also, the VIA chipsets are head and shoulders above Intel's GSE945, which somewhat ballences out the power usage.
__________________
Third rig: PC Express Invader. C2D E6400 2.13GHz, 4GB DDR2-800, 320GB HDD, Intel 945, Asus 9600GT 512MB, 550W PSU, W7 HP 64-bit.
Fourth Rig: Dell Optiplex 170L, P4 Prescott 2.8GHz, 512MB DDR266RAM, 80GB HDD, FX5200PCI 128MB, 250W PSU,XP Pro
Fifth rig (Laptop): Dell Inspiron 4000, 14.1", PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 9.3GB, XP Pro. Now with passive cooling!

“I could make a better looking computer case with a bucket of Lincoln Logs.” -lemode
Error 404 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What make and speed is my video card memory? W1zzard Articles 4 Mar 25, 2005 06:12 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts