techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > News

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 9, 2009, 05:09 PM   #1
malware
Eligible for custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,413 (1.74/day)
Thanks: 78
Thanked 986 Times in 497 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to malware Send a message via MSN to malware Send a message via Skype™ to malware

System Specs

Seagate and AMD Unveil World's First Demonstration of Serial ATA 6 Gbps

Seagate, teaming with microprocessor manufacturing leader Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) at the Everything Channel Xchange Conference in New Orleans this week, today unveiled the world's first public demonstration of next-generation high-speed data transfer - Serial ATA 6Gigabit/second - for bandwidth-hungry desktop and laptop PC applications including gaming, streaming video and graphics multimedia.
The Serial ATA (SATA) 6Gb/second storage interface will deliver the highest performance - burst speeds of up to 6Gigabits per second - for all PC applications, maintain backward compatibility with the SATA 3Gb/second and SATA 1.5Gb/second interfaces, and use the same cables and connectors as previous SATA generations to ease integration. The third generation of the mainstream storage interface for desktop and notebook computers also enhances power efficiency and improves Native Command Queuing, a SATA feature, to increase overall system performance and data transfer speeds of mainstream PC applications but especially applications with heavily transactional workloads such as scientific modeling and forecasting, and engineering design and simulation.


"The increasing reliance of consumers and businesses worldwide on digital information is giving rise to gaming, digital video and audio, streaming video, graphics and other applications that require even more bandwidth, driving demand for PC interfaces that can carry even more digital content," said Joan Motsinger, Seagate vice president of Personal Systems Marketing and Strategy. "The SATA 6 Gb/second storage interface will meet this demand for higher-bandwidth PCs. Seagate has a long history of being first to market with new technologies such as Serial ATA, perpendicular recording and self-encrypting drives, and is pleased to be teaming with AMD to stage the world's first public demonstration of SATA 6 Gb/second storage."


"AMD strives to deliver platform technology that our technology partners can use to create high- performance desktop and laptop PCs," said Leslie Sobon, vice president of Product Marketing, AMD. "The new SATA 6 Gb/second technology not only incorporates the best features of previous SATA generations but also includes new enhancements. This innovation enables AMD to continue to evolve its technology platforms and to develop low-cost designs that our technology partners can use to improve their own PC and laptop products."


The Seagate and AMD demonstration features two Seagate SATA disk drives - one a shipping Barracuda(R) 7200.12 3 Gb/second hard drive and the other a prototype Barracuda 6 Gb/second drive - in a desktop PC to show the performance difference between the two generations. The PC is powered by an AMD prototype SATA 6 Gb/second chipset. The Seagate SATA 3 Gb/second drive runs at more than 2.5 Gigabits per second and the SATA 6 Gb/second drive at 5.5 Gigabits per second, with the performance of each storage interface displayed on the PC monitor.

Serial ATA 6 Gb/second - Blazing speed for next-generation personal computing
Serial ATA (SATA), the mainstream storage interface for desktop and notebook disk drives, is currently available in two speeds - 3 Gb/second and 1.5 Gb/second. SATA 6 Gb/second was developed by the Serial ATA International Organization (SATA-IO) under the Serial ATA Revision 3.0 specification.

In keeping with SATA-IO objectives for designing a low-cost interface for desktop and notebook PCs, SATA 6 Gb/second maintains the low cost and low-power design requirements of previous SATA generations, and is designed to be backward compatible with SATA 3 Gb/second connectors, cables and other hardware.

Source: PRNewswire
malware is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 05:24 PM   #2
shiny_red_cobra
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 74 (0.04/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

System Specs

meh... they can make the transfer speeds as fast as they want, but what's the point when the hard drive itself is by far the slowest device in the computer?
__________________
Live for Speed
shiny_red_cobra is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 05:48 PM   #3
LoneEagle70
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 29 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiny_red_cobra View Post
meh... they can make the transfer speeds as fast as they want, but what's the point when the hard drive itself is by far the slowest device in the computer?
HHD will die soon . Building a RAID-0 with many SSD was easily busting that 3Gb/s. We built a server with a couple of SSD and had to buy a better controller card to handle the flow.

Note: The use of raptor/velociraptor in RAID-0 can have the same problems here.

Here an old article:
http://www.nextlevelhardware.com/storage/battleship/
LoneEagle70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 06:24 PM   #4
BazookaJoe
500 Posts
 
BazookaJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 800 (0.46/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 207 Times in 125 Posts

I agree - I'd be surprised if the SATA bus itself even lasts much more than 2 or 3 years.

I'd expect to see drive interfaces going optic or some such sooner or later.
BazookaJoe is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 07:47 PM   #5
TreadR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 79 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs
TreadR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 07:59 PM   #6
LoneEagle70
25 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 29 (0.02/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreadR View Post
OMG!

What kind of controller card did they use to handle 2GB/sec?
LoneEagle70 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 08:03 PM   #7
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneEagle70 View Post
HHD will die soon . Building a RAID-0 with many SSD was easily busting that 3Gb/s. We built a server with a couple of SSD and had to buy a better controller card to handle the flow.

Note: The use of raptor/velociraptor in RAID-0 can have the same problems here.

Here an old article:
http://www.nextlevelhardware.com/storage/battleship/


It doesnt matter you schmuck! No single SSD in the world can transfer at SATAII 3Gb/s speeds. No does the raptor/velociraptor in RAID-0.

It doesn't matter if you have 5 SSD drives in RAID-0, each drive is still connected to its own individual 3Gb/s port.
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2009, 08:45 PM   #8
ShadowFold
Eligible for custom title
 
ShadowFold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 12,855 (6.50/day)
Thanks: 1,381
Thanked 1,681 Times in 1,498 Posts
Send a message via MSN to ShadowFold Send a message via Skype™ to ShadowFold

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreadR View Post
My head. Just exploded.
ShadowFold is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 12:37 AM   #9
PCpraiser100
1000 Posts
 
PCpraiser100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,059 (0.60/day)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 68 Times in 61 Posts

System Specs

Does this mean that we have to get another motherboard for this? Cmon.
PCpraiser100 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 01:10 AM   #10
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
It doesnt matter you schmuck! No single SSD in the world can transfer at SATAII 3Gb/s speeds. No does the raptor/velociraptor in RAID-0.

It doesn't matter if you have 5 SSD drives in RAID-0, each drive is still connected to its own individual 3Gb/s port.
Guess again. Intels latest SSDs are starting to reach that 300meg cap.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 02:00 AM   #11
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
Guess again. Intels latest SSDs are starting to reach that 300meg cap.
But they havent hit the limit yet.
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 02:55 AM   #12
PP Mguire
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Venus, Texas
Posts: 2,272 (1.30/day)
Thanks: 276
Thanked 461 Times in 394 Posts
Send a message via AIM to PP Mguire Send a message via MSN to PP Mguire Send a message via Yahoo to PP Mguire

System Specs

But SSDs havent been around to even begin reaching their full potential in speeds. This argument has been had and won before on these very forums. Why argue over why upgrade is BAD in a world of steadily inclining technology?

And, a couple in raid 0 will hit the limit very easily. A single one can reach to 250.
PP Mguire is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 03:17 AM   #13
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

No one is arguing that upgrade is bad.....

And no, a couple cant hit the limit in RAID 0. Because they are independent of each other, and are on the separate SATA cable. Its not an IDE cable, where you have two drives on the same ribbon.

Even if you had 10 drives in RAID 0+1+5, you still wont max out a SATAII.

Watch the video that was posted and then think about it as long as it takes for you to get it.
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 03:29 AM   #14
_jM
1000 Posts
 
_jM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ocala,FL
Posts: 1,076 (0.59/day)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 174 Times in 157 Posts
Send a message via AIM to _jM Send a message via MSN to _jM

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by TreadR View Post
Holy shit... umm thats all i can say after watching that video.
__________________
_jM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 03:34 AM   #15
niko084
Eligible for custom title
 
niko084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 6,387 (2.71/day)
Thanks: 190
Thanked 739 Times in 599 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to niko084 Send a message via AIM to niko084 Send a message via Skype™ to niko084

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by PP Mguire View Post
Guess again. Intels latest SSDs are starting to reach that 300meg cap.
300meg cap???

For what a burst?

6gb/s Sata3 is only going to help with newer ultra high end drives that burst those speeds, we are a long ways from having nominal 3gb/s throughput from a single drive.

3gb/s is 384MB/s...

Intels current fastest ssd is-
Sustained sequential read: up to 250 MB/s
Sustained sequential write: up to 170 MB/s

Granted that's flying, but it still needs over 50% gain in read to hit the cap...
__________________
This electronic post is encrypted in the 'English language method', any attempt to decipher meaning from these symbols is a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. This includes, but is not limited to: interpreting the symbols through use of biological, visual decryption devices, translating the symbols into another language encryption scheme, and digital processing the symbols into a form conducive to oral interpretation.
HWBOT HEATWARE
niko084 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 03:58 AM   #16
TruthTeller
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 13 (0.01/day)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

so when will they get ssd's that can acctual take advantege of this?
TruthTeller is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 06:19 AM   #17
TreadR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 79 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
It doesn't matter if you have 5 SSD drives in RAID-0, each drive is still connected to its own individual 3Gb/s port.
Not really... how about this:
http://www.techpowerup.com/index.php?80422

Consider this, right now companies follow a trend, SSD's typically are in 2.5" format, and when the market will be saturated in a few years, with the possibility that Intel won't add SATA 6 support to the new platform at first, people will be stuck to SATA 3 but given the need to bring forth new products various designs might appear. How about an SSD that will fit in a 5.25" bay and that will feature 2, 3, or 4 internal "disks" in RAID 0, all in a single device. I've seen SSD's with 2 units in RAID 0 as a single SSD 2.5" drive on TPU, so who's to say they won't push it further?... all on one SATA connector! (to counter your argument)
TreadR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 06:43 AM   #18
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

To counter your argument.

That would be plain dumb using that enclosure or something a like, unless slower drives are used so a single SATAII port is not maxed out.
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 07:00 AM   #19
hat
Maximum Overclocker
 
hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,236 (5.15/day)
Thanks: 2,054
Thanked 2,039 Times in 1,549 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowFold View Post
My head. Just exploded.
IT TAKES MORE THAN 6TB TO GET INTO MORDOR

yes, put enough things on one bus and you'll clog it eventually. our point is that one single drive will never fill 3gbps, let alone 6gbps. and nobody has 20 grand to spend of 24 ssds
__________________
My Heatware
“Inb4 smartphone LN2 overclocking.” -radrok
hat is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 07:05 AM   #20
TreadR
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 79 (0.05/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
That would be plain dumb using that enclosure or something a like
Like integrated RAID? Yeah, pretty dumb!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
unless slower drives are used so a single SATAII port is not maxed out.
Now you're contradicting yourself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOSE View Post
No single SSD in the world can transfer at SATAII 3Gb/s speeds.
TreadR is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2009, 07:16 AM   #21
BOSE
200 Posts
 
BOSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wash DC
Posts: 271 (0.10/day)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts

System Specs

How am i contradicting my self??
BOSE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD and Seagate to Demo 6 Gbps SATA Interface btarunr News 10 Mar 3, 2009 04:40 AM
System Builder's Guide 2006 djbbenn Articles 37 Aug 25, 2006 02:47 AM
having problems with cod 2 MATTB25 Games 12 Jul 19, 2006 01:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts