techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > Hardware > General Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 20, 2009, 11:08 PM   #26
Pete1burn
500 Posts
 
Pete1burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 715 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Pete1burn

System Specs

Pete1burn | 2xFX-70 | 2.6GHz | 4gb DDR2 800 | 4247 | 4648 | 5993| 1733 | 1765 | 1633

Pete1burn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2009, 11:27 PM   #27
groothof22
75 Posts
 
groothof22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Leeuwarden,The Netherlands
Posts: 190 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 17 Times in 17 Posts

System Specs


Thats it
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Geekbench 4746.jpg
Views:	383
Size:	82.8 KB
ID:	23980  
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked

Last edited by groothof22; Mar 22, 2009 at 12:05 AM.
groothof22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2009, 11:46 PM   #28
Pete1burn
500 Posts
 
Pete1burn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 715 (0.45/day)
Thanks: 123
Thanked 67 Times in 60 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Pete1burn

System Specs

Did you post an image? There's nothing there for you.
Pete1burn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2009, 01:10 AM   #29
{JNT}Raptor
500 Posts
 
{JNT}Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 724 (0.25/day)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 88 Times in 84 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete1burn View Post
Did you post an image? There's nothing there for you.

No....I think he was actually talking smack to you......go get him.

On topic....I'll pick this up and give it a few runs.
__________________
<----- Specs
{JNT}Raptor is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2009, 02:09 AM   #30
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
 
HammerON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,463 (2.84/day)
Thanks: 4,055
Thanked 2,995 Times in 1,576 Posts

System Specs

Here is my lame score
Very upset with such a low score~~~~



HammerON | E8500 | 3.16 GHz | DDR2 1066 | 4607 | 5882 | 4905 | 2916 | 2489 | 1458 | Vista 32bit

Last edited by HammerON; Mar 21, 2009 at 09:17 PM.
HammerON is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2009, 11:04 PM   #31
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Bah! I can't get my Xeon system to do this benchmrk without BSOD. Still hunting down the problem!


*EDIT*

FAULTY L5420 it seems

Last edited by lemonadesoda; Mar 25, 2009 at 07:02 PM.
lemonadesoda is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 05:48 AM   #32
sweeper
500 Posts
 
sweeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW, Ohio
Posts: 753 (0.24/day)
Thanks: 146
Thanked 36 Times in 36 Posts

System Specs



full specs in sig.... <-------
__________________
sweeper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 09:05 AM   #33
Hayder_Master
3500 Posts
 
Hayder_Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: IRAQ-Baghdad
Posts: 4,871 (2.58/day)
Thanks: 389
Thanked 641 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Hayder_Master Send a message via Yahoo to Hayder_Master

System Specs

im go try it
Hayder_Master is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 09:22 AM   #34
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs



DanTheBanjoman | 2x L5310 | 2400MHz | FB-DIMM 667 MHz | 7039 | 9902 | 8509 | 1890 | 2173 | Can't find? | Should fix my memory
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 09:29 AM   #35
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

I took out the 667Mhz memory so it runs at dual channel 800, increases my score to 7081, quite pointless.
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 09:40 AM   #36
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
I took out the 667Mhz memory so it runs at dual channel 800, increases my score to 7081, quite pointless.
heh I was obsessing about 66mhz on my ram seems like it wouldn't make a difference anyway.

DrPepper | Q6600 | 3843MHZ | DDR2-1138 | 6767 | 8985 | 7549 | 3126 | 3557 | 1760 | Cake


Last edited by DrPepper; Mar 22, 2009 at 10:13 AM.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 10:36 AM   #37
DanTheBanjoman
Señor Moderator
 
DanTheBanjoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Utrecht, Utrecht, The kingdom of the Netherlands
Posts: 8,498 (2.56/day)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,077 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to DanTheBanjoman Send a message via MSN to DanTheBanjoman

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPepper View Post
heh I was obsessing about 66mhz on my ram seems like it wouldn't make a difference anyway.
When your system is severely bottlenecked by memory it does make a difference. Just need two 2GB 800MHz modules to replace the 667's, don't feel like wasting cash on them though
DanTheBanjoman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 10:39 AM   #38
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheBanjoman View Post
When your system is severely bottlenecked by memory it does make a difference. Just need two 2GB 800MHz modules to replace the 667's, don't feel like wasting cash on them though
I was referring to myself though I still can't beat your bloody score I've managed to get it at 4ghz and still 21 points behind.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 11:11 AM   #39
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

========== WANTED ================================================== ===========

Would someone kindly run the following:


Q6600 at 2.4 or 2.7Ghz on a PCI-e/DDR2 system. I would like to compare performance vs. my AGP Q6600. Thanks Dr Pepper!

Nehalem-EP! (hehe)

A ultra cheapo Core2 celeron or mobile Core2.

Atom 270. Thanks A Cheese Danish!

Atom 230/Z5xx esp. a netbook like Samsung NC10 or Asus/Acer

Via Nano or C7[/COLOR]


Last edited by lemonadesoda; Mar 25, 2009 at 01:15 AM.
lemonadesoda is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2009, 11:32 AM   #40
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.24/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

I'l give it a go mr soda I was about to compare 2.4 to 4ghz so I've already got the results for 2.4




Last edited by DrPepper; Mar 22, 2009 at 11:50 AM.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DrPepper For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 22, 2009, 11:46 AM   #41
Melvis
2000 Posts
 
Melvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,984 (1.56/day)
Thanks: 618
Thanked 470 Times in 391 Posts

System Specs

Melvis | FX-57 | 2.8 GHz | DDR 500 | 2144 | 2103 | 2657 | 1627 | 1529 | 763 | Windows XP 32
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	geekbenchmark.JPG
Views:	82
Size:	101.8 KB
ID:	23986  

Last edited by Melvis; Mar 22, 2009 at 12:02 PM.
Melvis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 04:27 PM   #42
A Cheese Danish
1000 Posts
 
A Cheese Danish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: At your local vending machine
Posts: 1,914 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 419 Times in 368 Posts
Send a message via AIM to A Cheese Danish

System Specs

My Laptop:


A Cheese Danish | T9300 | 2.5 GHz | DDR2 667 | 2767 | 3572 | 2949 | 1644 | 1564 | 1107 | Windows 7 Ultimate
Atom 270 posted.
And will have Ubuntu and Fedora up for my lappy by tonight as well.

Last edited by A Cheese Danish; Mar 24, 2009 at 09:07 PM.
A Cheese Danish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 04:39 PM   #43
3870x2
3500 Posts
 
3870x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, Mo
Posts: 4,549 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 692 Times in 558 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to 3870x2

System Specs

Heres my work laptop:


3870x2 | T2600 | 2.16GHZ | DDR 667 | 2259 | 2700 | 2522 | 1375| 1572 | 1045.83333333333333333333333 | My Work Laptop



when I get home ill test my home machine.
__________________
A+, N+, S+, MCSE.
Heatware
STEAM ID Name: furi0nst0rmrage (0s are zeros)
M O D E R N||W A R F A R E || 2 || CLUBHOUSE // TEAM
The amount exaltation of the processor cores can brings amazing floating” -sparkle

Last edited by 3870x2; Mar 24, 2009 at 04:48 PM.
3870x2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 04:41 PM   #44
3870x2
3500 Posts
 
3870x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, Mo
Posts: 4,549 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 692 Times in 558 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to 3870x2

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by A Cheese Danish View Post
My Laptop:
http://img.techpowerup.org/090324/geekbench.png

A Cheese Danish | T9300 | 2.5 GHz | DDR2 667 | 2116 | 2545 | 2130 | 1621 | 1559 | 846 | Windows 7 Ultimate

Will have an Atom 160 up later today.
That is very low for a T9300, my T2600 gets better than that. Might want to find the cause?

@ Melvis:
That score is pretty good for 0 MHZ ram!
__________________
A+, N+, S+, MCSE.
Heatware
STEAM ID Name: furi0nst0rmrage (0s are zeros)
M O D E R N||W A R F A R E || 2 || CLUBHOUSE // TEAM
The amount exaltation of the processor cores can brings amazing floating” -sparkle
3870x2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 04:53 PM   #45
A Cheese Danish
1000 Posts
 
A Cheese Danish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: At your local vending machine
Posts: 1,914 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 419 Times in 368 Posts
Send a message via AIM to A Cheese Danish

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3870x2 View Post
That is very low for a T9300, my T2600 gets better than that. Might want to find the cause?
Yeah, i just got up to 2164...i may do a clean install of 7 and see whats up. Then I'll probably run XP as well
A Cheese Danish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 05:45 PM   #46
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs


Problem right there. Check CPU-Z and BIOS.
lemonadesoda is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lemonadesoda For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 24, 2009, 06:36 PM   #47
A Cheese Danish
1000 Posts
 
A Cheese Danish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: At your local vending machine
Posts: 1,914 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 419 Times in 368 Posts
Send a message via AIM to A Cheese Danish

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
http://img.techpowerup.org/090324/Capture025534.jpg
Problem right there. Check CPU-Z and BIOS.
Ima edit it now. The multicore setting was disabled for some reason...
A Cheese Danish is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 06:41 PM   #48
3870x2
3500 Posts
 
3870x2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, Mo
Posts: 4,549 (2.35/day)
Thanks: 176
Thanked 692 Times in 558 Posts
Send a message via Skype™ to 3870x2

System Specs

thats pretty good for 1 core, says alot for the T9300.
__________________
A+, N+, S+, MCSE.
Heatware
STEAM ID Name: furi0nst0rmrage (0s are zeros)
M O D E R N||W A R F A R E || 2 || CLUBHOUSE // TEAM
The amount exaltation of the processor cores can brings amazing floating” -sparkle
3870x2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2009, 09:05 PM   #49
A Cheese Danish
1000 Posts
 
A Cheese Danish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: At your local vending machine
Posts: 1,914 (0.80/day)
Thanks: 121
Thanked 419 Times in 368 Posts
Send a message via AIM to A Cheese Danish

System Specs

Lenovo IdeaPad S10


A Cheese Danish | Atom 270 | 1.6GHz | DDR2 533 | 873 | 894 | 736 | 986 | 1063 | 546 | Windows XP x86 SP3
A Cheese Danish is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to A Cheese Danish For This Useful Post:
Old Mar 24, 2009, 10:53 PM   #50
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,347 (2.15/day)
Thanks: 750
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

^^nice. Dual channel DDR running on that Atom 270, right?! (Compare to my Atom 330 in the OP, which is single channel DDR2 667).

Notice that clock-for-clock the Atom 270/330 is pwning a P4 EE edition. That means that if/when they create an "Extreme" Atom 330 with just 10W, it will do very nicely. Larrabee is going to be ace. Even as a "server" processor:

e.g. Atom 330 "extreme" at 3Ghz and 10W = 2500 geekscore

"8" of these on one chip = 80W = 20000 geekscore

Compared with dual Xeons = 150W = 12500 geekscore

Twice the performance, half the power.

Last edited by lemonadesoda; Mar 25, 2009 at 01:16 AM.
lemonadesoda is online now  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts