techPowerUp! Forums

Go Back   techPowerUp! Forums > www.techpowerup.com > Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 1, 2009, 07:37 PM   #1
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,284 Times in 3,175 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

Zotac GeForce GTX 275 Amp! Edition

To read this review go to: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z...5_Amp_Edition/

Last edited by W1zzard; Apr 2, 2009 at 02:11 PM.
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to W1zzard For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 2, 2009, 04:41 AM   #2
erocker
Senior Moderator
 
erocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Milwaukee, WI.
Posts: 31,944 (12.77/day)
Thanks: 2,793
Thanked 12,310 Times in 7,827 Posts

System Specs

First GTX 275 review I've seen on the net!
erocker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 04:47 AM   #3
HammerON
The Watchful Moderator
 
HammerON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Cold North
Posts: 4,352 (2.82/day)
Thanks: 3,985
Thanked 2,879 Times in 1,542 Posts

System Specs

And another great review by the W1zzard!
I like the overclocking potential of this card
HammerON is offline  
Crunching for Team TPU
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 05:30 AM   #4
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Yep, great review Wizz. And amazing OC!

There's one thing though. Power consumption must be wrong on this sample card. I mean no way the GTX275 consumes much more than the GTX285, having less ROPs and running a tad slower. And even consumes more than the GTX295... NO WAY!

I guess that vanilla numbers were taken with the Zotac card too, underclocked to stock clocks right?? This (and I mean this single one sample) Zotac card must have something wrong IMHO. The high temperatures might also be related to those abnormal power consumption figures I guess? They are too high anyway.

Performance wise it seems Nvidia won this round in any case, in overclocking too (where's the easy to reach 1GHz in RV790??). I wonder how are they going to justify the GTX285 in the future though. They released this card to compete with the HD4890 and not have to lower GTX285 prices and they did won against it, but they'll have to lower the price a lot nonetheless to "compete" with their own card. Not that I didn't know it would perform almost like the GTX285. If it wasn't for the clock difference...
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 06:10 AM   #5
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 14,983 (7.29/day)
Thanks: 788
Thanked 12,911 Times in 5,655 Posts
Send a message via AIM to btarunr Send a message via MSN to btarunr

System Specs

Winnar!
__________________

Gadgets, Phones, Tablets, Cameras, TVs, HiFi...NextPowerUp
btarunr is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 09:27 AM   #6
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

I did say this would be like the 8800GT of the last series and I was right.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 09:30 AM   #7
Blacksniper87
75 Posts
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Rockhampton, Australia
Posts: 131 (0.09/day)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

System Specs

looks awesome but why does it out do the GTX 285 ?? i know its an overclock but what the hell
Blacksniper87 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 09:34 AM   #8
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blacksniper87 View Post
looks awesome but why does it out do the GTX 285 ?? i know its an overclock but what the hell
Most lower models, especially NVidia's will overclock beyond stock higher models performance, for example, the GTX260 either 192 or 216SP both overclock beyond a GTX280's performance at stock clocks.

Fantastic review, i found another for those interested in a direct comparison with the HD4890 reference and overclocked versions, not nearly as thorough as Wiz's review but thought I would throw it in.....

http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=17863&page=1
__________________
Tatty_One is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 11:30 AM   #9
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
 
WarEagleAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Gurley, AL
Posts: 9,994 (3.98/day)
Thanks: 3,810
Thanked 557 Times in 521 Posts
Send a message via AIM to WarEagleAU Send a message via Yahoo to WarEagleAU

System Specs

Still the GTX 285 ought to oc more, which would have it running higher than the 275. The fact that Nvidia has a card that outperforms its higher card is simply awesome.
__________________
=-TheEagle-=



http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=62454
“You crazy? Surfing any website without an antivirus is like freaking with a dirty woman without protection” -OzzmanFloyd120
- Edited for content and clarity
WarEagleAU is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 12:29 PM   #10
phanbuey
Eligible for custom title
 
phanbuey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 5,010 (2.48/day)
Thanks: 1,484
Thanked 959 Times in 812 Posts

System Specs

they didnt know what to expect from the 4890 so they released the fastest, cheapest card they could.
phanbuey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 01:29 PM   #11
yogurt_21
3500 Posts
 
yogurt_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,058 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 2,246
Thanked 542 Times in 443 Posts

System Specs

hey Wiz I thought the rop's were tied to memory bit on this architecture. Wouldn't that put the gtx275 at 28 rops based on the 448-bit memory? your chart has it at 32 rop's the same as the gtx285 whcih has a 512-bit mem interface.
yogurt_21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 01:40 PM   #12
Tatty_One
Senior(Citizen)Moderator
 
Tatty_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 12,748 (4.75/day)
Thanks: 1,094
Thanked 1,936 Times in 1,437 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tatty_One

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by yogurt_21 View Post
hey Wiz I thought the rop's were tied to memory bit on this architecture. Wouldn't that put the gtx275 at 28 rops based on the 448-bit memory? your chart has it at 32 rop's the same as the gtx285 whcih has a 512-bit mem interface.
Yes your correct.... they are 28 ROP's
__________________
Tatty_One is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 02:11 PM   #13
W1zzard
Benevolent Dictator
 
W1zzard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 13,792 (4.18/day)
Thanks: 184
Thanked 10,284 Times in 3,175 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to W1zzard Send a message via AIM to W1zzard Send a message via MSN to W1zzard

System Specs

thanks, fixed
W1zzard is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 03:10 PM   #14
Icewind31
200 Posts
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston Area, MA
Posts: 215 (0.08/day)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by W1zzard View Post
thanks, fixed
I believe in the table the listing for the Reference 275 has 32ROPS as well which needs correction
Icewind31 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 03:12 PM   #15
DrPepper
The Doctor is in the house
 
DrPepper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland (It rains alot)
Posts: 6,423 (3.28/day)
Thanks: 977
Thanked 828 Times in 667 Posts
Send a message via MSN to DrPepper Send a message via Skype™ to DrPepper

System Specs

If I can get a refund for my GTX260 I'm getting one of these.
DrPepper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 03:38 PM   #16
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icewind31 View Post
I believe in the table the listing for the Reference 275 has 32ROPS as well which needs correction
Yep, those are on the HD 4890 tables too.

I knew that it would beat my GTX 280, but getting so close to GTX 285 was a surprise. IMO they shot themselves in the foot, killing pretty must most of GTX 285 sales. 55nm version of GTX 280 would have been spot on with performance to HD 4890, but of course it would have had massive OC ability too, so dunno.

One notch slower shader clock to 1350 instead of 1404 would have worked too.
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 04:18 PM   #17
lemonadesoda
Eligible for custom title
 
lemonadesoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,337 (2.17/day)
Thanks: 749
Thanked 960 Times in 710 Posts

System Specs

Wow. Noisey. Like a hairdryer. Shame.

Wiz... PLEASE keep an "old skool" card in there with your review. Remember people who read reviews are often (and for advertising reasons) the ones who want to upgrade NOW and are looking at their options. So the question is... what are they upgrading FROM. So just one "3" series ATI and one "7" series nV will help ground the data for these people. (INCLUDING ME )
lemonadesoda is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 04:21 PM   #18
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemonadesoda View Post
Wow. Noisey. Like a hairdryer. Shame.

Wiz... PLEASE keep an "old skool" card in there with your review. Remember people who read reviews are often (and for advertising reasons) the ones who want to upgrade NOW and are looking at their options. So the question is... what are they upgrading FROM. So just one "3" series ATI and one "7" series nV will help ground the data for these people. (INCLUDING ME )
Yeah, I thought the same, but that's only this sample apparently. Looked at many other reviews and that's not the case with any other 275's around the net. It's a shame, but I think that Wizz got the broken card, because of the hurry.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 04:28 PM   #19
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
 
Binge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 6,065 (3.54/day)
Thanks: 948
Thanked 1,768 Times in 1,308 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Binge Send a message via MSN to Binge

System Specs

These cards are kind of cool. I'm sad that they skimped on the voltage control 295s have voltage control, come on nV!
__________________
I *UNITE* streamers and content providers on TPU!
My Heatware


Matias Quiet Pro (PC) / KBTalking Pro / Das Keyboard Professional S
Binge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 05:22 PM   #20
a_ump
2000 Posts
 
a_ump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairmont, WV
Posts: 3,081 (1.53/day)
Thanks: 450
Thanked 317 Times in 294 Posts
Send a message via AIM to a_ump

System Specs

well if they allowed voltage control the GTX 275 would probly best the GTX 285 even more easily. I agree nvidia definitely shot the GTX 285 sales with this release, were they really that unsure of what HD 4890 would bring? lol i couldn't see how
__________________
My Heatware

MRCL:What if Jesus came by and Apocalypse actually would happen? Weer:Then I'd be more afraid that other works of fiction would come true, such as Harry Potter.”
a_ump is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 05:40 PM   #21
iStink
200 Posts
 
iStink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 492 (0.29/day)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 49 Times in 47 Posts

System Specs

So I noticed on load, the fan noise is the loudest of any other card. Was this set to 100% or something? What were your impressions with the noise? I mean, is it really obnoxious?

When I got my 8800gt, the fan didn't kick in and make noise until it got to 100C or so. Is it possible they lowered the "kick in" temperature which is why load results in higher sound than the other cards?
__________________
iStink is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 06:01 PM   #22
LifeOnMars
2000 Posts
 
LifeOnMars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kettering,Northants. UK
Posts: 2,242 (1.25/day)
Thanks: 1,718
Thanked 401 Times in 337 Posts

System Specs

My next card.....just need to find one that performs as well but quieter
LifeOnMars is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 06:50 PM   #23
DarkMatter
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,694 (0.82/day)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 188 Times in 152 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by a_ump View Post
well if they allowed voltage control the GTX 275 would probly best the GTX 285 even more easily. I agree nvidia definitely shot the GTX 285 sales with this release, were they really that unsure of what HD 4890 would bring? lol i couldn't see how
The problem is that they couldn't do anything else. Nothing better at least. They knew HD4890 was going to be faster than GTX260 and slower than GTX285 and that's by itself a problem, because most people look for the second fastest thing. <- Because of how prices work.

A redesign to fit in the same performance gap is a waste of money IMO, so they just took the GTX260 240 approach. It's cheap because probably atm the yields for that chips are as high as the ones for the GTX216, that is they get as many 28ROP+240SP chips as 28+216 ones, so it makes sense. There's no point in using those chips in the lesser card GTX260 (disabling one working TPC, 24SPs) and GTX295 demand isn't all that high compared to mid-range/performance cards. For them both are almost the same thing, a GTX280/285 with some broken parts so the most units they can exploit the better.
DarkMatter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 2, 2009, 07:05 PM   #24
OnBoard
2000 Posts
 
OnBoard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,773 (1.14/day)
Thanks: 302
Thanked 382 Times in 302 Posts

System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by iStink View Post
So I noticed on load, the fan noise is the loudest of any other card. Was this set to 100% or something? What were your impressions with the noise? I mean, is it really obnoxious?

When I got my 8800gt, the fan didn't kick in and make noise until it got to 100C or so. Is it possible they lowered the "kick in" temperature which is why load results in higher sound than the other cards?
The cards try to stay in 80C, cooler is pretty much 40% (minimum) before that temperature and ramps ups as high as it goes, if the temperature doesn't go lower.

Those 55nm have a skimped out cooler, compared to 65nm GTX 260/280. Less pipes and less of the fins. 55nm GTX 260 already runs hotter than 65nm counter part and with this having more shaders (maybe more voltage) and a massive OC the cooler just can't cope with the heat in less RPM.

I'd think the fan is exact same still than in my stock cooler and with 100% it's something that you don't really want to listen. It's much lower and gentle wooosh than 9800GTX+ @ 100% how ever.

Get one of these and Accelero Xtreme and you got your self one sweet card
__________________
CPU-Z validation sig pics temporarily blocked
OnBoard is offline  
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OnBoard For This Useful Post:
Old Apr 2, 2009, 07:48 PM   #25
DanishDevil
Eligible for custom title
 
DanishDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,631 (3.10/day)
Thanks: 1,362
Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,585 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DanishDevil Send a message via MSN to DanishDevil

System Specs

Wow you were right. nVidia wanted to disrupt the 4890 launch and they absolutely did. If it weren't so loud (meaning I'd have to buy an aftermarket cooler) I would be tempted to pick one up in place of my GTX260
DanishDevil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
please spam this thread W1zzard Comments & Feedback 580 Mar 11, 2009 02:25 PM
Leadtek GeForce GTX 260 Extreme+ 216 Shaders W1zzard Reviews 15 Dec 26, 2008 12:57 PM
Zotac GeForce GTX 280 Amp! Edition W1zzard Reviews 55 Jul 8, 2008 08:37 AM
[XF] nVIDIA ForceWare 174.93 hicookie NVIDIA 33 Jun 21, 2008 01:12 AM
Nvidia 175.70 beta drivers out Solaris17 NVIDIA 1 May 14, 2008 04:36 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts